CASA CEO - Carmody - request your support via this survey
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Malua Bay
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I’ll bet RAAus one of CASA’s main simpering syncophants who rely on CASA for a significant portion of their funding would have had enough invitations to include the office staff who answer the phones.
Ng25
Regardless of the views of the survey, you are writing rubbish regarding RAAus CASA funding. It is less than 1% of RAAus revenue. You are obviously not a member and don't like them for some obscure, uninformed reason!
Regardless of the views of the survey, you are writing rubbish regarding RAAus CASA funding. It is less than 1% of RAAus revenue. You are obviously not a member and don't like them for some obscure, uninformed reason!
It's not just about money paid by CASA. It's also about the effective monopoly gifted by CASA to RAAus (nee AUF).
I'm guessing the RAAA would have received an invite.
Carmody... "only investigates allegations that contain facts"
3 AWis all swear the same testimony for something that did not and could not occur. Definitely not factual so is Perjury and conspiracy. FACT
Carmody changes wording of "allegations of criminality" to 'code of conduct' only. Then signs off on an 'investgation' into 'code breaches' only. thus avoiding the criminal aspect FACT. Costing the taxpayer 1/4 mil$+ for the perversion. FACT
AFP suggest the Criminal Code sections as breached , but decide its a low priority #, in their big drug busting scheme of things, not worth the mustard. FACT.
Sigh of relief from Aleck, promoting that it would be better dealt with by the QPS.anyway..but never went there. FACT.
ergo Carmody is untruthful. FACT.
3 AWis all swear the same testimony for something that did not and could not occur. Definitely not factual so is Perjury and conspiracy. FACT
Carmody changes wording of "allegations of criminality" to 'code of conduct' only. Then signs off on an 'investgation' into 'code breaches' only. thus avoiding the criminal aspect FACT. Costing the taxpayer 1/4 mil$+ for the perversion. FACT
AFP suggest the Criminal Code sections as breached , but decide its a low priority #, in their big drug busting scheme of things, not worth the mustard. FACT.
Sigh of relief from Aleck, promoting that it would be better dealt with by the QPS.anyway..but never went there. FACT.
ergo Carmody is untruthful. FACT.
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Malua Bay
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vag227 are you seriously saying that Raaus do a good job in advocating for their members? Just for the record I am a financial member but you are correct in that Im not very happy with them.
Because you haven't been around that long, Vag, you don't know or understand the long history, only the most recent chapter of which provides that theoretical option. Give us an estimate of the upfront fee payment CASA would charge to consider a Part 149 authorisation. In round 10s of thousands.
You didn't answer the question, Vag. Give us an estimate of the upfront fee payment CASA would charge to consider a Part 149 authorisation. In round 10s of thousands.
And since you've been around so long, tell us how much the AUF paid for the exemption it enjoyed (and continues to enjoy as RAAus).
And since you've been around so long, tell us how much the AUF paid for the exemption it enjoyed (and continues to enjoy as RAAus).
I think it is more than a little embarrassing for CASA that the existence of this survey has been discovered and that it is obvious that it has not been disseminated to their client base - perhaps only select receivers.
How is that a "survey"?
How is that a "survey"?
CASA has 'form' in that regard. The invitation to respond to the survey previous to this one went to a limited range of respondents, because the previous survey to the previous survey was open and the results rather unflattering for CASA.
Moderator
Is that "survey" genuine? "Fasterhorses"??
It appears very amateurish and devoid of any CASA authority or confirmation of being genuine?
It appears very amateurish and devoid of any CASA authority or confirmation of being genuine?
I continue to have my doubts, too, Tail-ey.
The questions are so weighted towards the negative, I can't see how they've come from CASA...
I don't believe they share the same dim view of themselves!
It's possible to re-do the survey over and over again - no way this came from CASA.
The questions are so weighted towards the negative, I can't see how they've come from CASA...
I don't believe they share the same dim view of themselves!
It appears very amateurish
https://fasterhorses.consulting
‘’This is a marketing consulting organisation. I fail to understand why CASA has to market itself to anyone. They don’t have to be “customer oriented” at all because they have the right to virtually kick down your front door metaphorically speaking.
Perhaps this is the harbinger of a new caring and sharing new age approach from our beloved regulator?
‘’This is a marketing consulting organisation. I fail to understand why CASA has to market itself to anyone. They don’t have to be “customer oriented” at all because they have the right to virtually kick down your front door metaphorically speaking.
Perhaps this is the harbinger of a new caring and sharing new age approach from our beloved regulator?
Its Carmody's last hurrah...or up-chuck. Thankfully)
Knowing the type of people in the Iron Ring I doubt any new approach for the GA Industry
They have that already.. snaring our wealth and caring for themselves.!!
Knowing the type of people in the Iron Ring I doubt any new approach for the GA Industry
They have that already.. snaring our wealth and caring for themselves.!!
If you are using a VPN server complete the survey say 20 times selecting a different IP address each time from the list available.
Don't mind admitting, I've completed the survey in Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne, Hong Kong, New Delhi, Bombay, England, and USA.
fasterhorses? just crap fast sh@t..
Don't mind admitting, I've completed the survey in Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne, Hong Kong, New Delhi, Bombay, England, and USA.
fasterhorses? just crap fast sh@t..