Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Large aircraft to private strips

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Jun 2020, 11:02
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,290
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
So if you can see the ‘dirt strip’ you can land on it. Sounds reasonable!

Why do we make such a fuss in Australia?
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2020, 11:43
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Equatorial
Age: 51
Posts: 1,068
Received 125 Likes on 62 Posts
Here’s a bit of dirt...


A bit of fun!
Global Aviator is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2020, 13:15
  #23 (permalink)  
601
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Brisbane, Qld, Australia
Age: 78
Posts: 1,477
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts
At any number of mine strips back on the 80s in Qld and NT you would see Lears, Westwinds and Citations.
These strips did not have nav aids. GPS was not even heard off. Omega was in its infancy.
Visual at LSAT and a WAC on the lap.
Only daylight operations.
However we did have our moments with ATC and the dreaded "Operational Approval"

Statements like"but you cannot go there" when submitting a plan for a landing point that was a gravel strip.
"Why"
"Your a jet"
"Yes and a jet that has a gravel kit and a AFM supplement for operations on sod and gravel"

One classic reply from the ATC bloke behind the desk that was worried about putting his signature in the box at the bottom of the flight plan when told that we had an AFM Supplement for sod and gravel ops was "But you blokes from Qld will put anything in your AFM"


601 is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2020, 14:42
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Aus
Posts: 192
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nothing new here, Cobham have been operating the 146 & RJ aircraft into Gravel strips without approaches or slope guidance since 2012
https://australianaviation.com.au/20...ravel-runways/
Agent86 is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2020, 15:04
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: 500 miles from Chaikhosi, Yogistan
Posts: 4,294
Received 139 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by machtuk
Did it for 10 years, all us pilots must have broken the rules (yr rules) thousands of times!
So did you change category from IFR or did you proceed in VMC under the IFR?
compressor stall is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2020, 22:35
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by compressor stall
So did you change category from IFR or did you proceed in VMC under the IFR?
Flights where filed under the IFR, we landed at said unimproved dromes anyway we could within the scope of the rules. Rarely even the rule book could be thrown out the window but only under certain conditions.
machtuk is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2020, 23:27
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: 500 miles from Chaikhosi, Yogistan
Posts: 4,294
Received 139 Likes on 63 Posts
I think you’ve missed the point of my question,, but I infer from that answer that you went below the LSALT in VMC under the IFR. That’s the normal way. You didn’t advise ATC to change category of flight to VFR (although you could).

Unimproved strips or mercy flights are obfuscation.
compressor stall is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2020, 12:11
  #28 (permalink)  
601
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Brisbane, Qld, Australia
Age: 78
Posts: 1,477
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts
I think you’ve missed the point of my question,, but I infer from that answer that you went below the LSALT in VMC under the IFR.
LSALT was your minima.
Not visual at LSALT go to alternate.
But we generally had a good idea what the weather was like.
601 is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2020, 08:54
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Melbourne
Age: 68
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lead Balloon
OK. Forget “dirt strips”.

Walk me through how a 5,700kg + aircraft engaged in ‘commercial’ operations - e.g. aerial work - is legally able to land somewhere that does not have an instrument approach.
I landed a jet at Ginbata when it was first built. No nav. aids. No forecast. Descend to LSALT ( or grid MORA)plus 500. If not visual divert to Newman. Simples. Check the synoptic chart for wind direction and use area QNH . Easy.
George Glass is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2020, 09:37
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Australia/India
Posts: 5,286
Received 419 Likes on 209 Posts
Thanks GG. I think we’ve established that it happens/ed frequently. The OP was asking about how it happens/ed legally. I think we’ve now sorted that out.

Cheers
Lead Balloon is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2020, 10:23
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Melbourne
Age: 68
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lead Balloon
Thanks GG. I think we’ve established that it happens/ed frequently. The OP was asking about how it happens/ed legally. I think we’ve now sorted that out.

Cheers
Not sure what your point is. It was perfectly legal. Mind you my F/O who had just come from LongHaul nearly had a fit .
Two different worlds........
George Glass is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2020, 10:50
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't get the confusion here? You can file an IFR Flt Plan in an A/C over 12500 lbs in AWK/Pvt Cat and land at a suitable unimproved strip legally! GG explains how!
machtuk is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2020, 11:32
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,290
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
Originally Posted by George Glass
Mind you my F/O who had just come from LongHaul nearly had a fit
Of course he did! He’d never been in a light aircraft before!
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2022, 08:29
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: SS Enterprise
Posts: 74
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reviving an old thread.

After a few years away from Aus, I am trying to find this AIP reference to restrictions on night operations in aircraft above 5700kg to aerodromes without instrument approachs. Has this reference been removed recently? ( due to the introduction of Part 91 )?

Originally Posted by brokenagain
No problems, as long as it’s daytime.

ENR 1.4


ENR 1.5
Qwark is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2022, 09:56
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: 500 miles from Chaikhosi, Yogistan
Posts: 4,294
Received 139 Likes on 63 Posts
After a few years away from Aus, I am trying to find this AIP reference to restrictions on night operations in aircraft above 5700kg to aerodromes without instrument approachs. Has this reference been removed recently? ( due to the introduction of Part 91 )?
Yes it was deleted. There is a small D on the RHS of page ENR 1.10-3. 1.4 and 1.5 were before 2 - Flight Notification.

Now Part 91 MOS 8.05(1) refers.

And I can't see anything in Part 121 that overrides that for >5,700 Air Transport ops.... yet.

Last edited by compressor stall; 13th Mar 2022 at 10:23.
compressor stall is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.