Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

ATSB Prelim Report Cessna Titan accident Lockhart River March 2020

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

ATSB Prelim Report Cessna Titan accident Lockhart River March 2020

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Jun 2020, 02:35
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 494
Received 17 Likes on 7 Posts
Because without the coded final approach fix, the navigation box won't transition into approach mode. This reduces scaling, and alarm limits that allows you to use the navigation system in the final segment. This is also why you require RAIM.

ICAO standard final segment length is 5nm.
alphacentauri is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2020, 03:29
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: earth
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Because without the coded final approach fix, the navigation box won't transition into approach mode. This reduces scaling, and alarm limits that allows you to use the navigation system in the final segment. This is also why you require RAIM.
yes I’m aware of that but there is no reason that the FMS can’t do that without having to have the extra waypoint there, it should just happen at 5NM
mr flappy is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2020, 04:12
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 494
Received 17 Likes on 7 Posts
There's plenty of reasons why the FMS/Nav can't function as you described.
alphacentauri is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2020, 06:21
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Brisbane, Qld
Posts: 1,370
Received 29 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by alphacentauri
There's plenty of reasons why the FMS/Nav can't function as you described.
Wouldn't that just be a software thing? Recognising you're 5nm to the point and start to transition?
Ixixly is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2020, 07:34
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Which 30 + year old GA aircraft have an FMS?
Vag277 is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2020, 08:18
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,556
Received 74 Likes on 43 Posts
Wouldn't that just be a software thing? Recognising you're 5nm to the point and start to transition?
We had this discussion some years ago and Ozexpat (I think it was) made the same statement as Alpha above.

At the time, I pointed out that the GNS-XLS box (not really an FMS) we had in the 146 scaled in to +/-0.3nm at 2nm before Foxtrot, so it seemed to me that the box could scale without having to cross a waypoint. Certainly, the fact that Foxtrot exists is most unfortunate and really cruels what would have been a terrific safety "upgrade" compared to NDB and VOR approaches. I am sure that if they were designed today, they would not be done that way.
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2020, 12:28
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Way north
Age: 47
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Vag277
Which 30 + year old GA aircraft have an FMS?
It's called a "pilot"
jmmoric is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.