Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Bushfires.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Jan 2020, 10:35
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 305
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by currawong
Yes, read it a while back.

Your rhetorical question was addressed with a Royal Commission after Black Saturday.

Here is a warning on the subject from a year ago.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-02-...ZCRGnYvcbGEJ24
So we are it's not "the Greenies" then?

How do they do the burns when climate change means the available window for doing burns is shrinking? The droughts are getting worse and the temperature extremes are worse. They weren't far of 50C at Penrith on Saturday. The Black Saturday fires saw people who had done all the possible clearing done burnt alive in their homes because the grass fires were enough to kill.

The scientists were telling us this would be an extreme summer for fires, the emergency services were telling us the same message and Scotty just sat there with his fingers in his ears saying "La, la, la, I can't hear you".

RickNRoll is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2020, 11:09
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 305
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
It's not the greens.

https://www.smh.com.au/national/this...10-p5395e.html
RickNRoll is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2020, 12:21
  #43 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by Compass Call
Sunfish
Surely a 'state of emergency' could ban recreational use of waterways to allow firefighters to do their job?
Or are the Aussies so stupid they would put recreation before their country??
recreational boaters are the least of the problems. I don’t have time to explain. the daily ops orders are many pages long and joblow has sfa of understanding. i f
dont have time to explain.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2020, 12:55
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Most locked down city in the world
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh so it's not the Greens. Where have Adam Bandt, Richard Di Natale been for the last 2 months.
Not one little snippet on tv, radio, newspapers yet Scomo gets a flogging. Of course, they are
in hibernation. They will come out of their rabbit holes when parliament sits next.
When the Democrats dismantled that was the day politics died in this country.
May god save the queen but nothing will save Greens in the next election.
Turnleft080 is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2020, 14:47
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 305
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Turnleft080
Oh so it's not the Greens. Where have Adam Bandt, Richard Di Natale been for the last 2 months.
Not one little snippet on tv, radio, newspapers yet Scomo gets a flogging. Of course, they are
in hibernation. They will come out of their rabbit holes when parliament sits next.
When the Democrats dismantled that was the day politics died in this country.
May god save the queen but nothing will save Greens in the next election.
The greens are being routinely blamed for all this on social media and in the Murdoch press. Where have they been? They have not had any political power and,i you read the links, they can't stop burns.
RickNRoll is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2020, 14:51
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 305
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
It's not the greens.

Factcheck: Is there really a green conspiracy to stop bushfire hazard reduction?

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/nov/12/is-there-really-a-green-conspiracy-to-stop-bushfire-hazard-reduction?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Copy_to_clipboard
RickNRoll is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2020, 15:25
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 305
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
[/In November 2019, she said: “The increasing intensity and frequency of fire is one of the greatest threats to biodiversity and natural landscapes. It may be politically expedient to pretend that conservationists exercise some mythical power over fire legislation and bushfire management committees, but it is not so.

“Such wild and simplistic claims avoid the very real and complex challenges of protecting our communities and the healthy environments that support our quality of life.”

Bowman said that separate to the “lazy political rhetoric” of blaming environmentalists, there should be an examination of the benefits and limitations of hazard reduction.
So there you have it, again. Simplistic claims that give people comfort.
RickNRoll is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2020, 16:36
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Currently: A landlocked country with high terrain, otherwise Melbourne, Australia + Washington D.C.
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Squawk7700
The last thing they need right now, is a bunch of low time PPL’s with a recently acquired AG rating, trying to drop retardant on bushfires!
You're right, albeit for the wrong reasons.

Low time PPLs are anyway not going to get an AG rating.

Why not? Because of CASR 61.1115 (1) (b) which requires candidates to hold a CPL or higher for the AG rating. Note that the rating itself is not enough, there's a requirement to hold the firebombing endorsement too.

Now that this has been clarified, I reiterate my suggestion that many who would otherwise be instructing or performing all sorts of less urgent flying activities when bushfires ravage Australia could get an AG rating with firebombing endorsement and act as reserve pilots.

Originally Posted by Sunfish
Squawk 7700 is absolutely correct. All it would do is cause confusion, inefficiency or casualties. There is a great deal of training needed just in operational procedures to start with.
Well, Squawk 7700 clearly wasn't. I'm not sure about the confusion, inefficiency and casualties part to be honest. Yes, there's a great deal of training involved but wouldn't that money be better invested so than spent in damage reparations? It'll take political impetus to implement. I'd rather read in the newspapers that a pilot died doing the right thing fighting fires than people who perished in the inferno trying to flee.

Originally Posted by Jerry Springer
An Ag Rating on it’s own is currently useless for getting a job fighting fires if you’re an Aussie on fixed-wing. 1,000 hours of Ag flying is the requirement, which will take a good number or years to log. There isn’t so much Ag work around these days
I suspect in years to come most of the fire-fighting pilots in Australia will be from overseas, as the 1,000 hours of Ag isn’t required of them - or maybe CASA will make a Fire-Fighting Rating that bypasses Ag ?
Many instructors have logged close to 1000 hours. As you say CASA would have the final say but I expect that things will change politically after this season's bushfires.
Okihara is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2020, 18:41
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: .
Age: 25
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Okihara


Many instructors have logged close to 1000 hours. As you say CASA would have the final say but I expect that things will change politically after this season's bushfires.
But what has being an Instructor got to do with Ag flying? 1000 Hours Ag time is totally different to 1000 hours instructing.
The Aussie requirement is for 1000 hours of Ag flying. You could have 20,000 hours of instructing and it would still be meaningless in terms of preparing you for firefighting.

I do think the 1000 hours Ag could be modified to include some other ‘relevant experience’ - military operations, mustering, aerobatics, mountain flying (not that Australia has any mountains of note) basically stuff involving stick-and-rudder skills low to the ground - but Instructing certainly isn’t relevant to firebombing. At the risk of offending anyone, I’d say most Instructors have very basic stick-and-rudder skills to start. They’re generally low-time pilots who don’t fly on the stick much themselves, they are in-fact mostly hands-off as they direct someone else flying.

In the USA, Canada and Europe, Firebombing pilots don’t have the 1000 hour Ag restriction, although in practice many have considerable Ag time. But then in the USA and Canada, there are more multi-crew firebombing aircraft where pilots can work as an FO on operations with a more experienced Captain, and hence build up relevant experience without doing Ag.

Last edited by Jerry Springer; 5th Jan 2020 at 19:38.
Jerry Springer is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2020, 18:54
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: .
Age: 25
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Okihara

Now that this has been clarified, I reiterate my suggestion that many who would otherwise be instructing or performing all sorts of less urgent flying activities when bushfires ravage Australia could get an AG rating with firebombing endorsement and act as reserve pilots.
Totally unrealistic. Sitting in the Right seat while a student does circuits is absolutely no preparation at all for flying near max weight, Low Level in hilly terrain, with strong winds and gusts and poor visibility while trying to accuracy dump tons of water out of an aeroplane. Every year experienced Ag pilots are killed doing low level work - a ‘reserve’ pilot would be dead before noon. Most instructors don’t even have tailwheel time, let alone turbine time, or float time for the Fireboss, or even low-level experience - what aircraft do you think a C-172 instructor is going to fly on firebombing? And which operator do you think will hand over a multi-million dollar machine to such a pilot, even if it were possible (and thankfully it’s not, and never will be).

Your suggestion is like saying, why doesn’t Qantas slot-in some reserve pilots with 1000 hours of Instructing into their 747s when the schedule gets a bit busy.

Last edited by Jerry Springer; 5th Jan 2020 at 19:28.
Jerry Springer is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2020, 21:02
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,870
Received 191 Likes on 98 Posts
Originally Posted by Okihara
You're right, albeit for the wrong reasons.

Low time PPLs are anyway not going to get an AG rating.

Why not? Because of CASR 61.1115 (1) (b) which requires candidates to hold a CPL or higher for the AG rating. Note that the rating itself is not enough, there's a requirement to hold the firebombing endorsement too.

Now that this has been clarified, I reiterate my suggestion that many who would otherwise be instructing or performing all sorts of less urgent flying activities when bushfires ravage Australia could get an AG rating with firebombing endorsement and act as reserve pilots.



Well, Squawk 7700 clearly wasn't. I'm not sure about the confusion, inefficiency and casualties part to be honest. Yes, there's a great deal of training involved but wouldn't that money be better invested so than spent in damage reparations? It'll take political impetus to implement. I'd rather read in the newspapers that a pilot died doing the right thing fighting fires than people who perished in the inferno trying to flee.



Many instructors have logged close to 1000 hours. As you say CASA would have the final say but I expect that things will change politically after this season's bushfires.
Please don’t keep telling me I’m wrong when I know what I’m talking about. A PPL (such as yourself) can get an AG rating, which comes after a CPL, but neither is a quick process which makes the suggestion rather laughable. As for reservists, forget it. Most instructors I know are lusting to fly a turbine more than ever and many will never get near one in the next 10 years.



Squawk7700 is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2020, 21:16
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: bkk
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are there any simple but effective set ups that can mitigate the risk of bush fires. I'm thinking of say a couple of 30,000 litre water tanks just dedicated to a sprinkler system around the perimeter of a property. Release the whole lot in a matter of minutes in front of advancing flames.
kangaroota is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2020, 21:36
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,870
Received 191 Likes on 98 Posts
Originally Posted by kangaroota
Are there any simple but effective set ups that can mitigate the risk of bush fires. I'm thinking of say a couple of 30,000 litre water tanks just dedicated to a sprinkler system around the perimeter of a property. Release the whole lot in a matter of minutes in front of advancing flames.
There has been a lot of talk about this, however in the case of many of these fires, the fire front exceeds 800 degrees and literally obliterates any water used long before the most intense of the flames even are close to the asset. You’d have to think that a retardant being used all over could help, but it comes down to cost of fitting such equipment to enable you to deploy it before the fire approaches.

The couple and the 13 animals that we’re in a 20 ft shipping container with fireproof cladding fitted were on the money. They said the roaring was akin to a nuclear explosion (in their opinion) that lasted for 30 minutes. In that case their house was still standing afterwards. Makes you think that they didn’t get hit by one of these 800+ degree fronts.

The traditional approach of blocking gutter downpipes and filling gutters with water and overflowing appears to work well as long as water pressure is still available last minute, however it doesn’t appear to be successful for these extremely hot fronts. Many home owners aren’t even prepared to the extent that they are able to fill their gutters which is alarming.
Squawk7700 is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2020, 21:46
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,870
Received 191 Likes on 98 Posts



This image was over 300kms from the nearest fire yesterday. Makes you realise how little use aircraft would be.
Squawk7700 is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2020, 22:34
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rick, "The Greens" have a clear stated policy regarding hazard reduction, as you have pointed out.

Greenies on the other hand, as already shown in the report in post # 20, are problematic.

As you point out, it is hard enough already to get hazard reduction done.

No doubt, when this is all over, you and I will have to spring for another very expensive Royal Commission that, after extensive investigation will tell us what we already knew.
currawong is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2020, 22:35
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Currently: A landlocked country with high terrain, otherwise Melbourne, Australia + Washington D.C.
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bla bla bla, regulations, superhero flying skills. The ship is sinking and you're asking me if the water is too cold to swim
Okihara is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2020, 22:52
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are two observations to make:

1. Australia is a back water of self-interest. Everything is hollowed out. Infrastructure, water and power all gone.
The system so devoid of capacity that a first world country has no capacity to deliver assets (fuel, food and water) down a highway to support a volunteer force fighting something they have de-funded from tackling.
Listening to that idiot Morrison keep digging a hole, Gladys hoping that no one mentions the cuts to the RFS and the " Commish" all resplendent in his medals on $370K a year defending the non-payment to those volunteers is pathetic.
Watching Smoko forcefully try to shake hands has gone global for a reason, he is not fit to lead a choir.

2. Australian strategic policy used to suggest that at best, the ADF could defend the Bass Strait oil fields..
That policy needs a re-think.From connections on the ground with two agencies, their message is overwhelming: a Fustercluk. ZERO communication, zero plan.
Local police and RFS and aid units, together, have been doing their own thing, the best they can.
Rated De is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2020, 00:19
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Currently: A landlocked country with high terrain, otherwise Melbourne, Australia + Washington D.C.
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's a good read on the topic: https://www.ffm.vic.gov.au/__data/as...ine-Tanker.pdf
Okihara is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2020, 00:47
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: .
Age: 25
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Okihara
Bla bla bla, regulations, superhero flying skills. The ship is sinking and you're asking me if the water is too cold to swim
No, it’s nothing to do with having superhero flying skills - its about having the necessary and relevant skills.
A 747 Captain isn’t a superhero and a firefighting pilot isn’t any more of a superhero - each simply has the skills necessary and relevant to their job.
A chap who has 1000 hours of sitting in the right seat while a student does circuits isn’t qualified for either a 747 job or a firebombing job - that’s obvious reality - I really don’t know how anyone would think otherwise.


And that’s not saying the others pilots have superhero skills - it’s just pointing out who is, and who isn’t qualified for a particular job.

Last edited by Jerry Springer; 6th Jan 2020 at 03:12.
Jerry Springer is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2020, 02:04
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Australian bushfires – recommended phone app – helps when lost

Emergency+ app

Several days ago, a spokesperson from the New South Wales RFS headquarters said their 000-emergency phone service normally handles 50 emergencies per day; now the number is more than 5,000.

Although they have increased their capacity to handle this number; they have noted a large number of people are calling in for help when they do not know where they are, which is understandable, if they been driving in heavy smoke conditions or maybe elsewhere when they suddenly need help.

The operators are spending an enormous amount of time trying to work out where the caller is located; which is especially hard for those who are tourists in unfamiliar territory.

The RFS strongly recommends the Emergency+ app, a free app developed by Australia's emergency services and their Government and industry partners which can be installed on your phone. The app uses GPS functionality built into smart phones to help a Triple Zero (000) caller to provide critical location details required to mobilise emergency services.

The moment you turn ‘tap on the app’; your latitude and longitudinal is shown so you and the operator can see where you are.

Those of you who have an aeromedical or SAR background will appreciate the advantage you are given when you can get specific geographical coordinates for your GPS systems.

And the price is right!
Rob
robsrich is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.