Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Who made the decision on the ASIC?

The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Who made the decision on the ASIC?

Old 18th Oct 2019, 10:32
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Santa Barbara
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh I don't know, I would have thought that if any country would require such a security measure introduced as a result of 9/11 it would be the US?

But no! Whenever I've had cause to enter an airport either airside or as a passenger in the US, or it be an airport that handles 'jet transport pilots' or GA or some of the bigger airports that handle substantial jet traffic, I haven't had a nazi approach me once. I've had fellas come up and say hello, checking in a friendly way why I'm there or if they could help me. Hell, I even know a bloke that has a hangar for his RV at an International Airport. He swipes a card to get into his hangar from a gate on the opposite side of the terminal.

I get over there pretty regularly, I've not had one poor experience with the TSA, not one. And they haven't 'randomly' checked me for explosives once with some drumstick with a chux on the end of it. But I reckon they'd know tout de suite if I was packing one.

The ASIC, I faithfully take it every where with me, wishing upon wish that someone will ask me for it at Warnambool. Just one day, it would make it all worthwhile.
The name is Porter is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2019, 11:07
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1998
Location: Mesopotamos
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Your alternate?
I'm very good looking, suave and intelligent, and don't know how they made such a mistake.
cattletruck is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2019, 11:20
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Santa Barbara
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was the Etihad incident out of Sydney not enough to make you aware there may be the odd threat out there? The knife attack on a kiwi aircraft a few years back? Threats to the MCG? ANZAC day? just to name a few.
Genuine question, how has the ASIC prevented any of these threats?

I reckon the Australian agencies have done a pretty good job picking up the vast majority of terrorist plots that have gotten to advanced planning stages. Do you reckon any of these plots have been picked up by any of these agencies checking whether any of the numpties held an ASIC or had applied for one and failed the application?
The name is Porter is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2019, 14:36
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: WA
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Whilst it doesn't answer Dick's specific question as to who in particular suggested or signed off on the introduction of ASICs, this Parliamentary Report provides some info on the various discussions that took place soon thereafter.

By implication, an AVID should be good intermittent access to a security controlled airport
I would not agree with that interpretation as the legislation dealing with access to a security controlled airport refers to ASICs only. CASA have been bum drumming pilots on Aviation Security since day dot. A visiting pilot from overseas once turned up in a rented 210 with family on board, was asked whether he had a current ASIC. He replied he did not but had and AVID and CASA said that was all he needed to fly a VH registered aircraft in Oz. Technically that was correct but they failed to say that - "if you intend to land at a security controlled airport, you will need an ASIC". Airport staff did the right thing, looked after him and his aircraft and saw him on his merry way. Not sure how he subsequently got on at other airports.
FWIW, I once forgot my ASIC and hired an aircraft that was on the GA side of a major international security controlled airport. No one batted and eyelid.

I know of another instance though where an airport was undergoing a security audit at the time and a small regional airline had one of their pilots land..... without his ASIC. The airport got the NCN from the regulator - go figure.

Last edited by YPJT; 18th Oct 2019 at 14:48.
YPJT is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2019, 17:08
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: ._..._...
Posts: 312
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by On Track
Not that there had ever been a terrorist attack...

Howard has a lot to answer for.
So do we wait for one, and a potential mass loss of life before we implement something, or......?
vee1-rotate is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2019, 01:09
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Vic
Posts: 124
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by vee1-rotate
So do we wait for one, and a potential mass loss of life before we implement something, or......?
And implementing an ASIC and 100 metres of fencing at every regional terminal stopped a terrorist attack?
Cedrik is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2019, 01:11
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,870
Received 191 Likes on 98 Posts
Originally Posted by Cedrik
And implementing an ASIC and 100 metres of fencing at every regional terminal stopped a terrorist attack?
How do you know it didn’t ?
Squawk7700 is online now  
Old 19th Oct 2019, 01:25
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Vic
Posts: 124
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Any person with a pilot licence in Australia has an ASIO file, any person with a legal firearm or explosives licence in Australia has an ASIO file. How does making pilots apply for another plastic card through a non government private entity make the world a safer place?
If Australia had a decent card licence with photo ID that could be used for security. Ask any pilot what they think of the current licence format.
Cedrik is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2019, 01:26
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Vic
Posts: 124
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Squawk7700


How do you know it didn’t ?
Because the Guvmint didn't make a big splash on the media telling us, they would do that.
Cedrik is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2019, 01:45
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 941
Received 26 Likes on 10 Posts
In answer to the question of what an ASIC does for security.
it acts as a deterrent. The person behind it has been a through a painful process to prove they are who they say they are and have a reason to be where they are and if someone doesn’t have one it acts as a red flag if they are somewhere they shouldn’t be.
Again I ask the question what do people complaining about it say should be done instead? Or do we just trust everyone in a pilots uniform wearing gold (or pink) bars?
ozbiggles is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2019, 01:54
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Vic
Posts: 124
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
As I said Biggles, pilots could use their licence..............................if it was a useful photo card licence instead of the idiotic paper sheet.
Cedrik is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2019, 02:00
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: sierra village
Posts: 667
Received 110 Likes on 57 Posts
People with malignant intentions will happily go through the painful process of obtaining an ASIC if it allows them unfettered access to carry out whatever it is they intend doing.

Forging an ASIC well enough to get past some guy with a big belt and trousers tucked into his boots at a gate surely can’t be all that difficult.

Please don’t make the mistake of believing that an ASIC is a silver bullet to save us from terrorists. At best, it’s an easily overcome inconvenience to them.



lucille is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2019, 02:07
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
I don’t think people quite understand what “security” means. To achieve true security you require defenses in depth - multiple checks with multi factor (ie different) forms of checks.

An ASIC on its own is useless. It needs to be checked EVERY TIME by someone with armed immediate backup to provide just one level of defense. The second level is to require a valid reason to be in the security zone at all. The third level is physical security of the zone itself - fences, razor wire, alarms.

The ASIC on its own is useless, any idiot with a laser printer and a laminating machine (or better still, screen printing capability) and the imagination to dress the part is in.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2019, 02:24
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,870
Received 191 Likes on 98 Posts
Originally Posted by Sunfish
I don’t think people quite understand what “security” means. To achieve true security you require defenses in depth - multiple checks with multi factor (ie different) forms of checks.

An ASIC on its own is useless. It needs to be checked EVERY TIME by someone with armed immediate backup to provide just one level of defense. The second level is to require a valid reason to be in the security zone at all. The third level is physical security of the zone itself - fences, razor wire, alarms.

The ASIC on its own is useless, any idiot with a laser printer and a laminating machine (or better still, screen printing capability) and the imagination to dress the part is in.
What is your background in Police, law enforcement, counterfeiting and or security Sunfish? You seem to have convinced yourself that you know a lot about it.

So you’re proposing someone checks the ASIC at the airport and behind that person checking is some kind of armed security officer? Which department will provide such a service and under what regulation or crimes act would that be implemented? Oh and what would their powers of arrest be and what National IT system would they use to check said ASIC holder’s personal records? (The same check that takes a week or two in order to obtain an ASIC)

All this talk of arming, fences, razor wire, alarms and other security scary stuff is putting me off wanting to visit the airport for the purposes of work or leisure travel.
Squawk7700 is online now  
Old 19th Oct 2019, 02:34
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,244
Received 189 Likes on 85 Posts
The ASIC on its own is useless, any idiot with a laser printer and a laminating machine (or better still, screen printing capability) and the imagination to dress the part is in.
Have to agree with you on that point Sunfish. A lot of what passes for airport security is window dressing. The fact that airports can issue ASICs is just one hole in the system. The other big hole in the system is the access that tarmac staff have to aircraft. They are not required to go through anything but the most rudimentary screening by a bored security person (another glaring hole in the system). What Sunfish is saying is that if the S in ASIC was to mean anything then his scenario would be what it looks like. He is not advocating for that to be introduced, if I have read his post correctly.

Lookleft is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2019, 08:16
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Abeam Alice Springs
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Where does it say that a PPL must hold an ASIC?

I understand that the old plastic licence will not return. CASA now looking at a phone app that will include your licence details....!

Where is the standardisation that gives guidance to rurual airfield operators as how they facilitate GA ops by pilots that do not hold an ASIC?
triadic is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2019, 09:20
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: WA
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Where is the standardisation that gives guidance to rurual airfield operators as how they facilitate GA ops by pilots that do not hold an ASIC?
Pretty simple really, if you want to have access at a security controlled airport that has screened services - ASIC 24/7. Airports without screened services you can apply Regulation 3.03. The sticking point there though is that many airports specify ASICs at all times regardless. Would be a very interesting test case.


So after reading the comments here I am wondering what was the purpose of Dick's question? I suppose he could point the finger at the GG of the time who signed off on the Aviation Transport Security Act 2004. What does it matter who played what part?
YPJT is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2019, 09:50
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: europe
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cedrik
As I said Biggles, pilots could use their licence..............................if it was a useful photo card licence instead of the idiotic paper sheet.
Which country have that?

USA? No, plastic but no picture
Europe? No, no picture and paper sheet.
Canada? No, picture but 24 pages booklet

Others?
arketip is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2019, 12:14
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Pretty simple really, if you want to have access at a security controlled airport that has screened services - ASIC 24/7. Airports without screened services you can apply Regulation 3.03. The sticking point there though is that many airports specify ASICs at all times regardless. Would be a very interesting test case.
I think the real issue that Dick has raised in part is that there is/was NO allowance made for GA ops, specifically at rural ‘security’ airports in the Regs. You don’t require an ASIC unless operating in a security marked area of such an airport. What is the procedure if you have to divert to Dubbo or Roma? Those procedures seem to be at the discretion of the airport operator, where the Regs should specify the procedures. Result is that no airports treat it the same. All rural airports should have an area that does not require ASICS. I call it discrimination!
cogwheel is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2019, 13:09
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: WA
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Cogwheel, has anyone yet been thrown in handcuffs for diverting to an airport when they don't have an ASIC. I think you are looking for an answer to a problem that doesn't exist.
YPJT is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.