The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Bell ditching off Newcastle

Old 7th Sep 2019, 20:26
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Age: 53
Posts: 70
Originally Posted by Horatio Leafblower View Post
Hi Duck
It's a Huey (UH-1H) not a Jetranger...

...and god only knows what it was doing but as a single engine experimental ex-mil helo, it's not on a charter.
Pretty sure Duck was across it mentioning the Bell 205, the civil ver of the UH1
markis10 is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2019, 23:33
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 2,778
It's not a 205, but a UH-1H, as said by Horatio. (Just to be pedantic )

UH-1H TCDS http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Gu...%20Rev%202.pdf

205 TCDS https://web.archive.org/web/20110608...4FILE/H1SW.pdf
megan is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2019, 23:59
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wanaka, NZ
Posts: 2,032
Compliance with Note 17 of the UH-1H TCDS might be difficult to explain in this instance.
gulliBell is online now  
Old 8th Sep 2019, 00:42
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 2,354
And while we are hanging off the edge of our chairs, waiting for Gullibell to tell us what Note 17 says, here is a short commercial break....
Ascend Charlie is online now  
Old 8th Sep 2019, 00:44
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Darwin and PNG
Posts: 868
Sadly the person who can probably explain why pax were on board was the pilot, if any of what has been mentioned above is true.

Wonder how the insurance company will react once the dust settles and the final report has been published?

Duck Pilot is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2019, 01:18
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wanaka, NZ
Posts: 2,032
Originally Posted by Ascend Charlie View Post
..waiting for Gullibell to tell us what Note 17 says....
It says:
"No person may be carried in this helicopter during fight unless that person is essential to the purpose of the flight".

gulliBell is online now  
Old 8th Sep 2019, 02:38
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 2,778
CASR Part 132
4.3 Carrying passengers

4.3.1 Limited category aircraft may carry passengers in a private flight, a cost-sharing flight or an adventure flight. Adventure flights are a popular tourist attraction and can offset the, sometimes considerable, costs of operating and maintaining a warbird or historic aircraft.

4.3.2 No more than six persons (including crew) may be carried on a WHR aircraft, regardless of the seating capacity of the aircraft.

4.3.3 If a WHR aircraft has a seating capacity in excess of six, an application may be made in writing, or as otherwise directed, to an administering authority for approval to carry a greater number than six. The outcome will depend on the type of aircraft involved and a comprehensive risk assessment that would be required as part of the consideration of such an application. Any approval granted will not exceed the aircraft’s designed seating capacity.
All legal on the face of it.
megan is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2019, 02:52
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 131
Going by the avionics fit out as posted on the rotorheads thread, it doesn’t look like this Aircraft was appropriately equipped for NVFR let alone two pilot IFR. Which ponders the question what was the aircraft doing out in the dark over water?
havick is online now  
Old 8th Sep 2019, 05:12
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 2,778
Certainly not the standard UH-1H instrument panel, missing the nice big attitude indicator and HSI, replaced by an iPad, wonder what that displayed? Centre console is missing all the lovely radio gear as well.

Photo courtesy of zhishengji751 and John Eacott on Rotorheads.




The original

Last edited by megan; 8th Sep 2019 at 05:32.
megan is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2019, 07:50
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,179

There are devices such as the iLevil and Aeolus Talos, but it would be be highly not recommend to rely on them. I’d hate to think the that they did or for anyone to consider fitting one as a primary instrument, despite an aircraft being experimental, limited or otherwise.

I also note that in the pic that their iPad is not plugged in. The better attitude products with external sensors used a wired USB data cable connection.



This is the Talos device that I use. It does NOT use the gyros in the iPad.
Squawk7700 is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2019, 09:01
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sydney
Age: 38
Posts: 108
There is likely an AI under the Ipad. A photo from however many week or months ago of the panel isnt really proof let alone indicative of what they had when flying.

.....they may have been on goggles and therefore legal vfr with differing weather and alt restrictions.
Professional Amateur is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2019, 09:44
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,179
Originally Posted by Professional Amateur View Post
There is likely an AI under the Ipad. A photo from however many week or months ago of the panel isnt really proof let alone indicative of what they had when flying.

.....they may have been on goggles and therefore legal vfr with differing weather and alt restrictions.
Look closely at the picture. The previously fitted instruments have been blanked out behind the iPad.
Squawk7700 is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2019, 10:29
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Above the 23.5 parallel Australia
Posts: 56
.....they may have been on goggles and therefore legal vfr with differing weather and alt restrictions.
Aircraft fit doesn't meet the requirements for "goggles".
Nipper is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2019, 11:26
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1
Originally Posted by megan View Post
It's not a 205, but a UH-1H, as said by Horatio. (Just to be pedantic )
Just to muddy the waters, the pilot almost always referred to it as a "Bell 205".
BahDumbTish is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2019, 22:55
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 2,354
If you are putting in a flight plan, the Huey acft type goes in as a B05 or BH05 - can't remember which.
Ascend Charlie is online now  
Old 9th Sep 2019, 00:10
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 1,248
The manufacturer regards the UH-1D & UH-1H as the Bell Model 205. The data plate would probably say:
Manufacturer's Model 205
Customer's Model UH-1H
Fris B. Fairing is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2019, 00:46
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 2,778
AC, the flight plan designator for all Iroquois models is UH1, thats 204/205/210/all UH-1 variants, etc

212 - B212
412 - B412
206 - B06 (probably the one you're thinking of)

You're correct Fris.
megan is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2019, 03:20
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sydney
Age: 38
Posts: 108
Squak7700...I see what you mean. Yeah thats a bit nasty if flown at night without an AI.

Nipper...ok. Not sure what civ gog requirements are regarding instruments. Nvfr instrument requirements I guess....which it doesn't meet then.
Professional Amateur is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2019, 03:51
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,179
Originally Posted by Professional Amateur View Post
Nipper...ok. Not sure what civ gog requirements are regarding instruments. Nvfr instrument requirements I guess....which it doesn't meet then.
There’s an AH over on the left. Massive parralax error though, assuming it was working. Not much else needed for NVFR it there’s a VOR or proper GPS fitted.

Squawk7700 is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2019, 04:11
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,150
What was the ATC clearance the pilot was following?

Interesting that the aircraft started to turn left at the same place pilots are often asked to hold.

Why the silence about the clearance details?
Dick Smith is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.