Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Bell ditching off Newcastle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Oct 2019, 10:48
  #181 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Australia/India
Posts: 5,287
Received 419 Likes on 209 Posts
And what of all the comms with other aircraft, Mick, which would help to justify the activation of the Romeos at the time?
Lead Balloon is online now  
Old 16th Oct 2019, 10:52
  #182 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 1,171
Received 196 Likes on 97 Posts
Originally Posted by Cloudee

The recording is only of the initial contact and the controller then asks him to contact delivery for onwards clearance. That exchange is not given.
Yes, that's correct. It was just a newspaper article after all. There's a summary (not transcript) of the exchange with Willy Delivery in the timeline graphic in the article.

As an aside, it's interesting that UVC reports being at 1,500 feet on contact with Willy Approach. According to the ADS-B data he was between 2,000 ft and 4,000 ft around that time.
MickG0105 is online now  
Old 16th Oct 2019, 11:00
  #183 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 1,171
Received 196 Likes on 97 Posts
Originally Posted by Lead Balloon
And what of all the comms with other aircraft, Mick, which would help to justify the activation of the Romeos at the time?
I don't have a dog in the restricted airspace race. There was a bunch of you doing just fine arguing that one to death the other day. Not my table, sorry.
MickG0105 is online now  
Old 16th Oct 2019, 11:09
  #184 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Australia/India
Posts: 5,287
Received 419 Likes on 209 Posts
Not to worry. Maggie Island will front up shortly to justify the activation of the Romeos.
Lead Balloon is online now  
Old 16th Oct 2019, 22:13
  #185 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Gafa
Posts: 196
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Don’t you worry, the Romeo’s are activated with or without justification! (Mine or otherwise)
Maggie Island is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2019, 12:42
  #186 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: perth australia
Age: 52
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lead Balloon
No. And, as with the ‘investigation’ into the ditching of NGA, it is unlikely the recordings will be made publicly available. There may be a selective (and probably error-ridden) transcript of comms, but I wouldn’t expect more.

National security is at stake in this case. Imagine if all the Willy Tower and Willy Approach comms on a late Friday afternoon were revealed: All the comms from those F35s and FA18/A/F/Gs and Wedgetails and the dozens of other ADF assets exercising in the active Romeos would reveal important tactical information to the bad guys. And on top of that there’d be all the civvy traffic comms. Too confusing for laypeople to understand.
I can assure you that any of these transmissions would definitely not be, in any form, a risk to national security.

PS I can sell you a really cool tin foil hat

Last edited by jumby164; 17th Oct 2019 at 12:44. Reason: typo
jumby164 is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2019, 00:16
  #187 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jumby164
I can assure you that any of these transmissions would definitely not be, in any form, a risk to national security.

PS I can sell you a really cool tin foil hat
your irony meter broken Jumbo?
Super Cecil is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2019, 04:37
  #188 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 4,380
Received 207 Likes on 95 Posts
I'll help you out here Jumbo - Willy after lunch on Fridays is a little quiet, with the only aircraft flying being the SAR chopper doing the rounds of the crab pots on the Saltash Range, in preparation for the 3pm stand-down and crab cook-up.
Ascend Charlie is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2019, 07:11
  #189 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,602
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes on 28 Posts
The ATSB Interim report is now out.

Very strange. ATC cleared the pilot coastal southbound at night!

Also the pilot requested to remain on the eastern side of R578A. That would put the aircraft way out over the ocean!

Looks as if he was terrified of military restricted airspace and that the military don’t have a ADSB Receiver at Willy.
Dick Smith is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2019, 08:01
  #190 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Report debunks the abuse levelled at RAAF controllers. Absence or otherwise of ADS-B receiver at Willy is irrelevant
Vag277 is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2019, 10:36
  #191 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
https://www.atsb.gov.au/publications...r/ao-2019-050/
currawong is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2019, 10:41
  #192 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dick Smith
The ATSB Interim report is now out.

Very strange. ATC cleared the pilot coastal southbound at night!

Also the pilot requested to remain on the eastern side of R578A. That would put the aircraft way out over the ocean!

Looks as if he was terrified of military restricted airspace and that the military don’t have a ADSB Receiver at Willy.
Strange? Why?

Given the call made re turbulence it would seem logical to want to avoid terrain.
currawong is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2019, 10:41
  #193 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 1,171
Received 196 Likes on 97 Posts
Originally Posted by Dick Smith
The ATSB Interim report is now out.

Very strange. ATC cleared the pilot coastal southbound at night!

Also the pilot requested to remain on the eastern side of R578A. That would put the aircraft way out over the ocean!

Looks as if he was terrified of military restricted airspace and that the military don’t have a ADSB Receiver at Willy.
Funny how different people focus on different things. The part of the preliminary that caught my eye was,

Pilot details
The pilot held Private and Commercial Pilot (Helicopter) Licences and was qualified to fly by day under the Visual Flight Rules.
MickG0105 is online now  
Old 7th Nov 2019, 10:59
  #194 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,876
Received 193 Likes on 100 Posts
Originally Posted by MickG0105
Funny how different people focus on different things. The part of the preliminary that caught my eye was,
The issue with reading this is that are we've read this, we immediately believe that the pilot has zero NVFR or IFR experience. That may or may not be the case...

Plenty of pilots with current NVFR ratings have met similar fates.
Squawk7700 is online now  
Old 7th Nov 2019, 15:30
  #195 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: QLD - where drivers are yet to realise that the left lane goes to their destination too.
Posts: 3,337
Received 182 Likes on 75 Posts
But more likely more without them have.
Traffic_Is_Er_Was is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2019, 19:49
  #196 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 4,380
Received 207 Likes on 95 Posts
It wouldn't matter whether he had past experience or not, the aircraft wasn't equipped for NVFR and the instruments that were fitted (refer the cockpit photo some pages back) were telling lies. A look at the AI on LHS would make him go into a descending left turn. Which is what happened.
Ascend Charlie is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2019, 21:13
  #197 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,602
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes on 28 Posts
Currawong.

Your comment doesn’t meet the commonsense test.

Why would he make a request to keep out of the RAAF restricted airspace ?

And why was it active when it looks as if there was no military traffic. Why not just Class C
Dick Smith is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2019, 21:29
  #198 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Aus
Posts: 568
Received 71 Likes on 25 Posts
Originally Posted by Dick Smith
Currawong.

Your comment doesn’t meet the commonsense test.

Why would he make a request to keep out of the RAAF restricted airspace ?

And why was it active when it looks as if there was no military traffic. Why not just Class C
In the transcript he got “cleared to track AS REQUIRED to Bankstown.”

Just stop it.
junior.VH-LFA is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2019, 21:48
  #199 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dick Smith
Currawong.

Your comment doesn’t meet the commonsense test.

Why would he make a request to keep out of the RAAF restricted airspace ?

And why was it active when it looks as if there was no military traffic. Why not just Class C
Because, the best route, given the conditions, was the route the crew requested and received.

You still have not answered my question. Why was it strange for ATC to issue a clearance coastal southbound at night?
currawong is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2019, 22:08
  #200 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,876
Received 193 Likes on 100 Posts
Originally Posted by Ascend Charlie
It wouldn't matter whether he had past experience or not, the aircraft wasn't equipped for NVFR and the instruments that were fitted (refer the cockpit photo some pages back) were telling lies. A look at the AI on LHS would make him go into a descending left turn. Which is what happened.
I really don’t think a photo from some time ago taken of a panel of an unpowered electric or vacuum artificial horizon is evidence enough to say that it wasn’t working ! Let alone even hint that it was the cause!

It might shock some out there to know that some aircraft in this country that are rated for NVFR don’t even have an AH fitted !!!
Squawk7700 is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.