Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Civil Aviation Act change – good or bad?

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Civil Aviation Act change – good or bad?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Jul 2019, 06:15
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
McGrath50, proper, well known, settled, risk management analysis can answer your questions about safety and risk both together. They are not mutually exclusive as you might think and CASA knows this but chooses to ignore it.

In the case of the GA airvan, I would suggest that unless the aircraft was fleet leader in terms of hours or cycles, grounding might not be appropriate. The aircraft type has been around for quite a while.

‘’However from CASAs position, ANY risk to itself is intolerable.

Last edited by Sunfish; 28th Jul 2019 at 07:43.
Sunfish is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.