Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Qantas Group Training Academy at Wellcamp

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Qantas Group Training Academy at Wellcamp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Mar 2022, 10:35
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 16
Received 6 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Dreamboy97
Why aren't they picking these students who are supposedly trained to their standards and who have made a $130,000 commitment to the company?
These students made a $130,000 commitment to the Australian government. It’s not a cadetship in the traditional sense
BEVLY9 is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2022, 10:43
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 796
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
Because JQ run their own program.
Going Nowhere is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2023, 05:43
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The refueller tells me there's a handful of QFPP graduates about to start at Jetstar as F/Os on the A320, with whatever handful of hours they have at the end of the program.
tictac123 is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2023, 22:08
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 1,433
Received 207 Likes on 69 Posts
Originally Posted by tictac123
The refueller tells me there's a handful of QFPP graduates about to start at Jetstar as F/Os on the A320, with whatever handful of hours they have at the end of the program.
why hate on the cadets, the rest of the world has used low hour cadets for decades. Welcome to the modern world Australia!
Ollie Onion is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 16th Feb 2023, 23:42
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,934
Received 393 Likes on 208 Posts
why hate on the cadets, the rest of the world has used low hour cadets for decades
Lufthansa and British Airways being notable practitioners with their respective schools in the USA (50 years) and Hamble (1960 - 1982), nothing new as Ollie says..
megan is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 17th Feb 2023, 04:06
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Lalaland
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Ollie Onion
why hate on the cadets, the rest of the world has used low hour cadets for decades. Welcome to the modern world Australia!

I dunno Ollie, maybe compare the conditions between the US and Europe? One has an inexhaustible supply of cadets, the other does not.
dctPub is online now  
Old 2nd Apr 2024, 23:18
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2024
Location: Aus
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Take CAUTION when thinking of getting trained here. I have many colleagues who are on the active hold who haven't gone anywhere in over a year. They graduate a new course every 5 weeks and overall hundreds get added to this "active hold file" many not going anywhere. It is just a marketing tool (over promising, knowing they'll never hire) for FTA to pump sausages out. The theme is that ex students who only graduated within months before, teach the next wave of students. It is hard for FTA students to get jobs within the GA industry as operators know they are on the active hold and unlikely to hire them due to experience in a diamond. You end up with a $135,000ish HECS with terrible prospects. Son or daughters of qantas pilots get unfavoured treatment during hiring process, with their parents sneaking them in for simulator sessions on the exact simulator they do the actual recruitment process in. So its an unfair assessment. If you are a child of a qantas group pilot though not that bad of an option as they get pulled off the active hold by internal politics and phone calls between staff and recruitment even if they have lower assessment criteria than others. 2 of my friends made the active hold one a qantas child with lower assessment results and flight training/exam results than the non qantas child, and the qantas child got pulled in immediately.

I tried building hours with a GA operator but couldn't hack the disrespect and lack of appreciation for hard work in the industry. Went back to IT earning as much as a mainline FO with a much better lifestyle, less stress and flying as a hobby instead. If you really want to pursue it, I'd recommend going to a smaller flight school, who take the time with you, you are able to network with GA operators at the same time. Possibly flight schools that are combined with a charter company. Get an older instructor who has spent years in a GA and actually teaches you the commercial side of things.
jackyboi is offline  
The following 4 users liked this post by jackyboi:
Old 3rd Apr 2024, 10:26
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Here and there
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 14 Posts
Loan from the government! Wrong. It is the government giving out a load using Taxpayer money. MY money!
Flight schools are money hungry and that spin about get a flying job straight after getting the CPL and then pay back the loan is absolute BS!
Try and get a car loan or a house loan and see what happens.

'So son you have a loan of $150K hanging over your head?' 'Next please and close the door on your way out'.

I am of the view that we have too many CPLs being trained each year compared to the number of flying jobs available. But those who do not get a job and or took up a VET FEE loan still have to repay my taxpayer money. Those that get a job will typically will not be pulling $150K in the first or second oi third year of being a paid CPL. And they still have to get that payback mill stone from around their neck as their years slip by.

R
runway16 is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 3rd Apr 2024, 23:57
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 2,298
Received 356 Likes on 195 Posts
Originally Posted by jackyboi
Take CAUTION when thinking of getting trained here.They graduate a new course every 5 weeks and overall hundreds get added to this "active hold file" many not going anywhere.
Most of the latest grads are either headed to Qlink or JQ. The rest are being employed either as instructors or GA placements. It was a bit hit and miss at the start, but it has gotten better.


It is just a marketing tool (over promising, knowing they'll never hire) for FTA to pump sausages out.
I never understand the hate against ‘sausage factories’. Airlines don’t want 101 non-standardised trainees each doing things their own way, they want people all raised with the same skills and mindset and adherence to SOPs, at an institution where they have access to your training records and can monitor your progress on both technical and non technical skills.

2 of my friends made the active hold one a qantas child with lower assessment results and flight training/exam results than the non qantas child, and the qantas child got pulled in immediately.
How did you gain access to recruiter’s assessment scoring for multiple candidates which is always kept strictly confidential?

Originally Posted by jackyboi
l

I tried building hours with a GA operator but couldn't hack the disrespect and lack of appreciation for hard work in the industry.
So why not aim for a course where you have a much higher chance of getting straight into an airline in the first place?


Last edited by dr dre; 4th Apr 2024 at 00:08.
dr dre is online now  
The following users liked this post:
Old 4th Apr 2024, 04:38
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Posts: 2,469
Received 310 Likes on 116 Posts
I don’t hold much hope for Jacky Boi’s career in this industry if that’s his/her/them/its attitude at the very beginning.

Disrespect in GA? Hahahaha, welcome mate.

What about the disrespect you’ve shown to the candidates who were fortunate enough to get into QLink or similar that you’re now hanging **** on because of your perceptions about their recruitment?
morno is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2024, 11:22
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2024
Location: Aus
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
For the opinions above. I agree with RWY16's comments, I have already paid off 2/3 off my debt I paid in lump sum payments to quickly reduce debt to enable greater borrowing power for business and personal loans for opportunities im currently pursuing.

To answer Dr Dre that's good to hear that it has gotten better. I was only of the earlier groups. I have heard a lot of personal stories from others there who struggled to get jobs that wasn't the case for me very fortunately in GA, so I am grateful for that. Caused a bit of stress for fellows friends who were in the same course. You make a good point about sausage factories I agree airlines would like that. But I mean in terms of going to GA after graduating from a factory, I'd rather be taught from someone older with a lot more experience having thousands of hours in GA (I do understand that its hard to find these people and they aren't as readily available obviously), just if I were to choose a different option that's what I'd look for. I didn't have access to qantas recruiting staff criteria and results, but we all had access to everyones training results in our course, that was very transparent, instructors/teachers brought those up in front of us multiple times and its very easy to see where everyone ranks. In terms of the actual HR stuff from qantas though of course they keep it confidential but talking amongst the group to all the friends in the course, you hear how people performed in sims and their interview and it was clearly below yours or others and they still got ahead. Im not saying it's just me, but there were others in my course who didn't make it and felt the same way after everyone shared their experiences. Your last point yeah I should have done more research prior and I'm sure you can target courses with a much higher chance or guaranteed job. I would most likely go for those cadetships where you have a guaranteed job with a GA company after your training.

For morno - Im not hanging **** on any candidates, we were all very close basically a family for year. We were all very close and transparent. I'm still really good friends with the majority of my course and a lot of them who went on to subsidiaries,I have nothing against them and commend them. I know a lot of them were much more smarter and quality candidates than me and I don't fault anyone but myself. I was trying to give a perspective from the inside, as I feel as though the academy is very glamorised, and just to know that you are a customer when you go there and not to forget it. I love flying and I continue to fly privately at the moment fairly often. You're right maybe I'm not cut out to be in the airline industry. But after working GA for nearly 2 years I understand what it's like now and the truths or realities of the industry. Im not sure why you're laughing at me for bringing up disrespect in GA. Do you not think you should be respected when you go to work, and I don't mean treated like a god, I mean treated like a human, respected, spoken to with decency, not micromanaged all the time, not appreciated for extra effort you put into work that goes above and beyond your job. You may laugh, but you don't want to be the one building someone else's empire and getting underpaid and treated terribly for hard effort. Spending years to work your way up to a small airline as a first officer and still get paid basically the same as a tradie. Judging by your join date im assuming you may already be in the airlines and that's great, but people fail to mention the grind to get where you get. The low pay and underappreciation with the responsibility and stress you have in GA is not worth getting paid the award or near it, where cleaners are making more than you an hour. I understand you have to start small and grind to move up, but I wanted to give my perspective in that I personally don't think it's worth it. All the time away from family, poor pay, extra study you need to put it beyond work hours, wasting your youth. When you can build a business, earn the money that gives you a comfortable sufficient lifestyle and fly privately if that is your passion. I was not trying to be aggressive in my first post. But yes I do agree I think my friends which I love who I met in GA they are a lot tougher than me, they have a different mindset, they are happy to sacrifice a lot for what they want to achieve in. their career, I totally understand that. But for me I'm not willing to sacrifice reduce pay, which means I can't start compounding that until later in life, being away from friends and family for so long.
jackyboi is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2024, 01:48
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 2,298
Received 356 Likes on 195 Posts
Originally Posted by jackyboi
You make a good point about sausage factories I agree airlines would like that. But I mean in terms of going to GA after graduating from a factory, I'd rather be taught from someone older with a lot more experience having thousands of hours in GA (I do understand that its hard to find these people and they aren't as readily available obviously), just if I were to choose a different option that's what I'd look for.
If someone wants a career in GA after graduating initial flight school then I’d say to them go learn at a GA oriented school not an airline academy.

The ability to effectively teach is really independent of experience or background. I’ve seen instructors with 1,000s of hours of GA experience attempt to teach and they don’t get through to the student, nor are they teaching for the right reasons.

but talking amongst the group to all the friends in the course, you hear how people performed in sims and their interview and it was clearly below yours or others and they still got ahead.
I wouldn’t take someone’s personal assessment of a sim check or an interview as a definite conclusion on how they performed. I’ve spoken to people who said they didn’t think they performed well in a sim ride or interview - then got the job. And those who said they aced the sim ride or interview - and didn’t get the job. Maybe people who did well were harsh on themselves, and people who did poorly refused to accept they had done anything wrong. It’s only HR and the recruiting team who see the full picture of how someone has performed in the recruitment process.



Your last point yeah I should have done more research prior and I'm sure you can target courses with a much higher chance or guaranteed job. I would most likely go for those cadetships where you have a guaranteed job with a GA company after your training.
Yeah alright - but a guaranteed first job or a career? It’s a long term investment. Yeah doing a Rex or Sharp cadet program may be a guaranteed job, but the QF Academy is a 50-70% chance of a job within the group straight up and then I would imagine priority in recruitment for the rest.

Given Rex pilots are applying to QF at a very high rate I’d say aim initially for where you want to be in the long run.
dr dre is online now  
Old 10th Apr 2024, 04:32
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 311
Received 349 Likes on 109 Posts
I’ll chime in here.

This idea of GA pilots coming up to the airlines with thousands of hours of no SOPs or poor SOPs is horse ****. It’s easily learned. Stop spreading this myth that you can’t teach a late 20s or mid 30s, 40s etc pilot new SOPs when they finally hit the airline world.

There is very switched on low hour pilots who grasp stuff quick and slower learners who probably need a few thousand hours GA to help the transition into multi crew jet ops.

I’ve also seen experienced GA pilots who are absolute dog ****. Some of which are in the airlines and I wouldn’t trust them to fly VFR in a c172.

”Teaching them higher standard SOPs from day 1”. Yeah right. Most GA schools out there hold a decent standard on paper/SOPs. However, go talk to testing officers out there. It’s changed in the last half decade. There’s a lot of low hour g3s teaching dog **** who don’t know basic theory themselves. And this applies to the cadet school at wellcamp too.

CPL candidates going up for tests who can’t read a TAF, or tell you alternate requirements because “my instructor said that airport is always good to go”. The list goes on. I regularly talk to testing officers and the standard anecdotally has fallen hard particularly when it comes to theory and knowledge. Literally hearing stories of CPL candidates who aren’t RPL standard on test day. Never make it into the aircraft. That is a **** reflection on the instructors and any school that allows a student to get put up for test who cannot get through theory needs to bring those instructors in for tea and bickies.

There is a stigma towards these diamond cadets. Some of it deserved and not always through fault of their own. Shiny jet-school syndrome catches many out.


Last edited by soseg; 10th Apr 2024 at 07:11.
soseg is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by soseg:
Old 10th Apr 2024, 18:15
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 16 Posts
I'm sure this may have been said in this thread already, but I'm pretty sure this flying school only exists to produce a pilot oversupply and keep wages low.

After a quick look on LinkedIn, it appears the vast majority of QGPA grads are not working for any Qantas group airline or flying in GA. If anyone has some stats debunking this please let me know. I wonder how long they will hang around before giving up on the Airline Pilot fairytale.

Climb150 is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 10th Apr 2024, 22:45
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: sierra village
Posts: 674
Received 115 Likes on 60 Posts
I’ve said this before, only three factors for a “successful” career… Luck, Perseverance or a rich, well connected Mummy (or Daddy).

Note: Success is in the eye of the beholder and certainly does not mean Happiness. As most of us have discovered by the time we hit 40.
lucille is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2024, 01:04
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 2,298
Received 356 Likes on 195 Posts
Originally Posted by Climb150
I'm sure this may have been said in this thread already, but I'm pretty sure this flying school only exists to produce a pilot oversupply and keep wages low.
Only if the training output from other schools has decreased. There’s no data from after 2021 that I can find but it would be interested to see if the Academy has had a negative effect on CPLs issued from other flying schools?

After a quick look on LinkedIn, it appears the vast majority of QGPA grads are not working for any Qantas group airline or flying in GA. If anyone has some stats debunking this please let me know. I wonder how long they will hang around before giving up on the Airline Pilot fairytale.
Most on LinkedIn are there because they are putting themselves out there for a better position. Those who have achieved that are less likely to list on LinkedIn.

I have it on fairly good authority the situation has improved with recent grads.

dr dre is online now  
Old 17th Apr 2024, 10:11
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2024
Location: Cairns
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think they’re either over 100 (or almost there) pilots hired from the Academy into Link and JQ. Last I heard there was practically nobody on hold with JQ and grads who pass the assessment centre are getting starts pretty quick. Massive appetite projected for the rest of 2024 too. Only a matter of time before other AOC’s get their training sorted for low time pilots then it’ll be game on.

The early days it was a different story because of the way it all started up, but they seem to be starting to get the hang of it now.
goodtimeNOTalongtime is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2024, 04:26
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: You know where the Opera House is? Well....no where near there.
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 11 Posts
It'd be nice if they publicly stated the success rate of applicants who end up getting jobs in the airlines. Being upfront to these young men and women before they take on the huge loans would be nice. Not too sure if they do or not..
CaptainInsaneO is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 18th Apr 2024, 10:56
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2024
Location: Cairns
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CaptainInsaneO
It'd be nice if they publicly stated the success rate of applicants who end up getting jobs in the airlines. Being upfront to these young men and women before they take on the huge loans would be nice. Not too sure if they do or not..
It would be nice, but like anything in aviation, 24hrs is a long time, so numbers change. Even the rate of success from each course is different, as is their progression into the group. And unfortunately there are those that will see a variance in numbers and immediately look for a conspiracy to manufacture drama.

But you are right, my belief is that transparency and honesty is a far better approach than radio silence or cherry picked figures that fit today’s narrative. Come to think of it that’s probably why I’m not in Corporate Comms 😜
goodtimeNOTalongtime is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2024, 14:51
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,307
Received 223 Likes on 100 Posts
Originally Posted by CaptainInsaneO
It'd be nice if they publicly stated the success rate of applicants who end up getting jobs in the airlines. Being upfront to these young men and women before they take on the huge loans would be nice. Not too sure if they do or not..
Not just "nice" but as a taxpayer whose money is bring used to fund their loan I would say it is essential.

Do they exist to flood the market with pilots? No, they exist to divert an eye watering amount of taxpayers' dollars into a few pockets and to build a business model that makes it very difficult for other training providers to compete with.
Clare Prop is offline  
The following 3 users liked this post by Clare Prop:


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.