Australian T-vasi
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Abeam Alice Springs
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There are still a few about as it costs to change over. Mildura for example has one of each on each end of the same runway 09/27 as when it was extended to the west a new installation was required. Check ERSA it is all there.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: australia
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Came out of the murk at 250' into SIN one day with a recently qualified cadet as PF. Four whites (he'd flown a decent ILS approach) whereupon he immediately poled forward "to regain slope". Almost without exception, everywhere else in the network had PAPI where 4 whites was high and it'd been drummed into him to get back on slope. No matter we were at 250' AGL, no matter about inducing a high sink rate, no matter that the runway was some 10,000' long even if we were high.
He'd not mentioned it being a T-Vasis in his briefing so I brought it to his attention, it obviously didn't sink in - almost unlike us!!!!. Lesson learned and it certainly made me lift my game on future trips into SIN and the PF henceforth made me understand that he understood exactly what he was looking for.
He'd not mentioned it being a T-Vasis in his briefing so I brought it to his attention, it obviously didn't sink in - almost unlike us!!!!. Lesson learned and it certainly made me lift my game on future trips into SIN and the PF henceforth made me understand that he understood exactly what he was looking for.
There's about a dozen listed in ERSA - some at major airfields.
Witwiw - bit a concern (presumably) your mate hadn't seen a VASIS before - limited training and approach by rote?
Witwiw - bit a concern (presumably) your mate hadn't seen a VASIS before - limited training and approach by rote?
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: australia
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The outfit I flew for then went to SIN about 15 times a day so there is every chance the F/O saw it on his line training. Notwithstanding that, PAPI's were the go just about everywhere else. He was also a product of training in Australia (in the '90's) when there were plenty of T-Vasis installations around.
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Perth Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
There was a classic at the Maldives, listed as a PAPI but was a T-VASI in fact.
One operator (ME) got REALLY low until a go-around was done.
Took a year or so to get changed as runway was little used, 12 from memory??
One operator (ME) got REALLY low until a go-around was done.
Took a year or so to get changed as runway was little used, 12 from memory??
There was a classic at the Maldives, listed as a PAPI but was a T-VASI in fact.
One operator (ME) got REALLY low until a go-around was done.
One operator (ME) got REALLY low until a go-around was done.
Don't worry Leddie, I won't be over there anytime soon!
if the PAPIs are flashing, it's a signal from some whizzbang system
Can't find any reference for the YPXM installation - it may have changed.
"Yeah - -
that should show the VASI so that's the VASI. Could be it's that foreign kind of VASI - - shows too high, I guess."
The words of the co-pilot of a PANAM 707 that came in too high for runway 25 at Sydney in 1971. The aircraft landed long and slid off the far end of 25 into the mud.
In those days it was termed a Pilot Error accident. That term although apt, is banned now due to political correctness and that sort of nonsense.
See full report: https://www.atsb.gov.au/media/24595/197101852.pdf
that should show the VASI so that's the VASI. Could be it's that foreign kind of VASI - - shows too high, I guess."
The words of the co-pilot of a PANAM 707 that came in too high for runway 25 at Sydney in 1971. The aircraft landed long and slid off the far end of 25 into the mud.
In those days it was termed a Pilot Error accident. That term although apt, is banned now due to political correctness and that sort of nonsense.
See full report: https://www.atsb.gov.au/media/24595/197101852.pdf
Which Australian ports still have Vasi or T-Vasi?
Cheers
Cheers
Christmas Island, Rwy 18, had one of those. It happens if you get 4 reds and are still getting lower on profile.
Can't find any reference for the YPXM installation - it may have changed.
Can't find any reference for the YPXM installation - it may have changed.
Back onto VASIs though, I flew into Leigh Creek in a lightie one night about an hour and half after last light. From memory I was aware there was a T-VASIS but when you are used to flying only into PAPIs there can be a tendency to drop down a little. The first light below woke me up to the error of my ways
What really annoys me though is PALs with no confirmation of activation.
Last edited by YPJT; 1st Oct 2018 at 03:27.
I've always thought that T-VASIS is better than 4 light PAPI. To me, a simple minded soul, it is much easier to interpret coz it shows me where I'll end up and also for wide bodies it provides a parallel descent path unlike PAPI which is a point source.
Originally Posted by Musta
I've always thought that T-VASIS is better than 4 light PAPI.
Only advantage is that some reds and whites are so orange I'm always perfectly on-slope.
Thats because a lot of airports don't maintain them
Stopped for a cup of tea and a ponder. Turned out that the contractor had laid down the light boxes for Runway 20 on the opposite runway 01. After that was sorted and the TVASIS flight tests were OK, we discovered that during the test runs for runway 20 we were getting spurious red lights. Closer inspection revealed salt water deposits from the nearby coastline were encrusted on the red filters causing refraction and erroneous light signals. Moisture on the lamp lens as in early morning dew or erroneous indications in mist or fog, can cause erroneous light signals meaning spurious combination of fly up or fly down lights.
A fatal crash to an RFDS King Air happened at Mount Gambier at midnight and misty conditions. The aircraft flew into the ground 4 miles on final in the approach configuration in line with the runway.. The Mt Gambier T VASIS was well known by local operators to give erroneous signals under those meteorological conditions. It could not be proved the pilot followed erroneous light signals in misty conditions but it was the most likely explanation since he had called visual and his landing lights were seen by a witness. After that accident Air Services issued a NOTAM stating RPT jet aircraft not permitted at Mt Gambier.
PAPI is also not immune to erroneous light signals under certain weather conditions.
Years before during operations at Nauru, TVASIS signals were often unreliable because obese kids used to jump on the TVASIS boxes displacing them enough to give an erroneous signal. Or the kids would fire stones from a catapult into the boxes and smash the lens. Often a whole TVASIS box was u/s. That made night approaches a bit tricky since one of the vertical boxes being out of action gave the pilot a different perspective on final. For example if the first two boxes of the three above the on course lights were inop the pilot could mistake that at night for the aircraft flying one dot high. By lowering the nose to get back on slope and the top light went out as expected, in reality you were now coming on final with an indication of being on the 3 degree slope but in fact you were coming in at two dots fly down since two of the vertical fly down lights were inoperative. At Nauru, a Boeing 727 nearly over-ran after landing a bit longer then expected on runway 30 because the pilot was fooled at night and thought he was on slope when he was actually two dots fly down all the way in. One tends to believe the TVASIS on a dark night and a vague feeling of coming in high is easily dismissed as imagination or tiredness.
The answer to that is to use the DME v Height as a back-up if the DME is suitably located. Better still, never completely trust any type of VASIS at some of the more remote destinations since the maintenance could be non-existent and flight tests few and far between - if any at all.
