Check List Design in GA aircraft - often superfluous
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Check List Design in GA aircraft - often superfluous
The Australian newspaper Tuesday September 25 page 2 has a headline Crash Pilot boasted he did not need pre-flight checks. This was in reference to the ATSB report on the King Air crash at Essendon. On the same page, contributor Byron Bailey under the headline Checklists indispensable to safety describes why checklists are important. He makes an important point, stating "There is a widespread opinion among general aviation pilots that checklist are too long winded, thus increasing the likelihood of missing an item, but this incident shows how vital it is for pilots to take time to action checklists and undergo takeoff emergencies simulator training."
His point is valid especially with regard to current checklist design trends.
Dr Google says: After the crash of the Model 299 on October 30, 1935, the Checklist was introduced by Boeing, as a permanent and mandatory tool, to be used by all pilots in the Boeing fleet.
The original checklists were designed thus as a written before take off drill. There was also a Before Landing drill. The RAF during WW2 emphasized the importance of the before takeoff checks calling them VITAL ACTIONS. Since then checklists have not only been extended to cover before starting engines, but for almost every conceivable situation. To top it all off many flying schools now require their students to even conduct the walk-around inspection using a checklist. Some CASA FOI may even demand additional checklist items to be added even though this is their personal opinion and not a manufacturer's recommendation. This Ppune contributor once saw a roller blind checklist designed by the civilian owner of a former RAAF Winjeel. He had installed a home made roller blind type checklist that had no less than 137 individual checklist items. The first item started with "Good Day" I noticed after a while he dispensed with the checklist altogether.
This writer took over a student for dual instruction whose previous instructor was on holidays. After strapping in, the student apologised by saying he had left his checklist in his car. Asked to start the engine without the crutch of a checklist he was unable to do so. After the flight he was also unable to remember how to close down the engine without reference to a written checklist. He had flown twelve hours in the Cessna 152 yet had no idea how to fly without a checklist to read. The blame fell squarely on his flying instructor.
Most of us learned to fly at flying schools. We are prone to carry over bad habits learned from our instructors. Heavy reliance on checklists that are superfluous can eventually lead to skipping checklists altogether. The philosophy behind the term VITAL ACTIONS Before Take Off needs to be considered and a red pen run through the rest. That way pilots will be less inclined to skip checklists altogether and maybe avoid another disaster like the King Air crash.
His point is valid especially with regard to current checklist design trends.
Dr Google says: After the crash of the Model 299 on October 30, 1935, the Checklist was introduced by Boeing, as a permanent and mandatory tool, to be used by all pilots in the Boeing fleet.
The original checklists were designed thus as a written before take off drill. There was also a Before Landing drill. The RAF during WW2 emphasized the importance of the before takeoff checks calling them VITAL ACTIONS. Since then checklists have not only been extended to cover before starting engines, but for almost every conceivable situation. To top it all off many flying schools now require their students to even conduct the walk-around inspection using a checklist. Some CASA FOI may even demand additional checklist items to be added even though this is their personal opinion and not a manufacturer's recommendation. This Ppune contributor once saw a roller blind checklist designed by the civilian owner of a former RAAF Winjeel. He had installed a home made roller blind type checklist that had no less than 137 individual checklist items. The first item started with "Good Day" I noticed after a while he dispensed with the checklist altogether.
This writer took over a student for dual instruction whose previous instructor was on holidays. After strapping in, the student apologised by saying he had left his checklist in his car. Asked to start the engine without the crutch of a checklist he was unable to do so. After the flight he was also unable to remember how to close down the engine without reference to a written checklist. He had flown twelve hours in the Cessna 152 yet had no idea how to fly without a checklist to read. The blame fell squarely on his flying instructor.
Most of us learned to fly at flying schools. We are prone to carry over bad habits learned from our instructors. Heavy reliance on checklists that are superfluous can eventually lead to skipping checklists altogether. The philosophy behind the term VITAL ACTIONS Before Take Off needs to be considered and a red pen run through the rest. That way pilots will be less inclined to skip checklists altogether and maybe avoid another disaster like the King Air crash.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: back to the land of small pay and big bills
Age: 50
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Only 12 hours..I’m not surprised! Had he/she flown any other type? When I had 12 hours total tome I had only started the aircraft myself 2 or 3 times! Prior to that my instructor was doing the starts..I didn’t even taxi until we were clear of the flight line for the first 5 hours
Absolutely agree Sheppy - I'm going through this with CASA at the moment. Between the manufacturer + the FOI + CASA's type specialist, the result is not a checklist but an instruction manual. The vital stuff completely lost amongst the dross that has no or little impact on the flight. I'm brave enough to drop the dross, but as all "flight check systems" have to be approved, I see no chance of getting a genuine checklist approved 
My ab-initio single engine training required me to have all check commited to memory before going solo (I can still remember them all these years later).
From the point of GA multi engine training I have always used checklists however. Most of the GA and smaller turboprop checklists where so long that there was no room for common sense, and addressed items which were seldom of any importance.
The smallest checklist I have ever used is on the largest type I have flown (high capacity jet) 🤔
From the point of GA multi engine training I have always used checklists however. Most of the GA and smaller turboprop checklists where so long that there was no room for common sense, and addressed items which were seldom of any importance.
The smallest checklist I have ever used is on the largest type I have flown (high capacity jet) 🤔
Heavy reliance on checklists that are superfluous can eventually lead to skipping checklists altogether. The philosophy behind the term VITAL ACTIONS Before Take Off needs to be considered and a red pen run through the rest.
Only 12 hours..I’m not surprised! Had he/she flown any other type? When I had 12 hours total tome I had only started the aircraft myself 2 or 3 times! Prior to that my instructor was doing the starts..I didn’t even taxi until we were clear of the flight line for the first 5 hours
To top it all off many flying schools now require their students to even conduct the walk-around inspection using a checklist.
The accident report mentions a checklist paper that I have often referenced, and given the link to here on Pprune. It's the first in the following list, the other links may be of interest, particularly the second in which human performance issues are addressed. The mere fact that you use a checklist may be no saviour, it's how you use it that counts. Failure to use them properly has lead to any number of fatals, DC-9 no flap take off that didn't make it, Helios 737 that failed to pressurise and crashed with the loss of all. Fly safe.
https://human-factors.arc.nasa.gov/f...010-216396.pdf
https://human-factors.arc.nasa.gov/f...people/kd.html
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/c...9910017830.pdf
https://ti.arc.nasa.gov/m/profile/ad...Checklists.pdf
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/c...0170005594.pdf
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Earth
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Absolutely agree Sheppy - I'm going through this with CASA at the moment. Between the manufacturer + the FOI + CASA's type specialist, the result is not a checklist but an instruction manual. The vital stuff completely lost amongst the dross that has no or little impact on the flight. I'm brave enough to drop the dross, but as all "flight check systems" have to be approved, I see no chance of getting a genuine checklist approved
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A bit of aviation history in checklist design. RAAF Publication No. 416 February 1944 Pilot's Notes for Tiger Moth Aircraft. By Command of the Air Board. Air Force Head-Quarters, Melbourne, S.C.1
Vital Actions before take off:
Elevator Trim neutral.
Throttle Friction nut tight
Mixture control right back to fully rich position.
Fuel cock fully on. Contents sufficient for flight.
Slots unlocked.
Flying controls tested for freedom of movement.
Contrast those items for simplicity with the checklist for the Cessna 172 and Cessna 150 used by one Melbourne flying school.
Trims...set for takeoff.
Throttle friction nut ...set firm
Mixture...rich
Magnetos...on both
Master...On
Primer...in and locked
Fuel...On both
Flaps...Set 0 degrees or 10 degrees for take off.
Instruments...Checked and Set.
Engine instruments...in the green
Switches...Lights etc
Controls..Full, free, correct sense
Hatches & Harness ...secure.
Note one vital check is missing in the flying school checklist. Seats...Secure. That item is listed in the manufacturers Cessna Pilot Information Manual
Vital Actions before take off:
Elevator Trim neutral.
Throttle Friction nut tight
Mixture control right back to fully rich position.
Fuel cock fully on. Contents sufficient for flight.
Slots unlocked.
Flying controls tested for freedom of movement.
Contrast those items for simplicity with the checklist for the Cessna 172 and Cessna 150 used by one Melbourne flying school.
Trims...set for takeoff.
Throttle friction nut ...set firm
Mixture...rich
Magnetos...on both
Master...On
Primer...in and locked
Fuel...On both
Flaps...Set 0 degrees or 10 degrees for take off.
Instruments...Checked and Set.
Engine instruments...in the green
Switches...Lights etc
Controls..Full, free, correct sense
Hatches & Harness ...secure.
Note one vital check is missing in the flying school checklist. Seats...Secure. That item is listed in the manufacturers Cessna Pilot Information Manual
In the early seventies I did my multi instrument rating training at Correll Advanced Flying Training (YMMB). Instructors were mostly ex RAAF or ex airline. They required a check list which was only on two sides of an A4 page.. Actually it was a To Do list, and was used in the same format for every light twin GA type, with info drawn from the AFM. This was common practice then. It was required that all be committed to memory.
On the Normal Procedures side, there was pre start and start, pre takeoff, line up, on take off, after take off, top of climb, cruise, top of descent, preaid, prelanding, PPUFF., and after landing. Under each subsection there were only a few key ToDo items. There was also a small table of key speeds (usually for MTOW at ISA at sealevel), and a short table of fuel capacities, endurances and weights
On the Emergency procedures there was a summary of most key actions that might be needed: EFOTO, EF in cruise, EF during an IF procedure or circuit, securing actions, SE approach, manual gear extension, crossfeed, and a longer list of speeds.
Put into a clear plastic sleeve and left on the aircraft dash, you could very quickly find any key info that you needed on either the Normal or Emergency procedures side. In the sleeve between the two outer pages was a more detailed W&B table, fuel consumption rates at various altitudes and power settings to facilitate quick flight planning, necessary for charter work out in the bush.
I recently looked at a (CASA approved) QRH for a very light training aircraft, and found it was over 60pages long! It included literally hundreds of items, many not even related to operating an aeroplane ( e.g. adjust the seat belt neatly after flight). This new world may create in trainees the idea that it is more important to be able to complete this ridiculously long list of actions (many of which are at best marginally relevant), rather than to focus on the actions and checks needed to operate the aircraft safely and efficiently, and on flying ability. IMO, the present QRH system actually detracts from effective and safe airmanship through distraction via this unnecessary complication. This needs some serious research...
Seabreeze
On the Normal Procedures side, there was pre start and start, pre takeoff, line up, on take off, after take off, top of climb, cruise, top of descent, preaid, prelanding, PPUFF., and after landing. Under each subsection there were only a few key ToDo items. There was also a small table of key speeds (usually for MTOW at ISA at sealevel), and a short table of fuel capacities, endurances and weights
On the Emergency procedures there was a summary of most key actions that might be needed: EFOTO, EF in cruise, EF during an IF procedure or circuit, securing actions, SE approach, manual gear extension, crossfeed, and a longer list of speeds.
Put into a clear plastic sleeve and left on the aircraft dash, you could very quickly find any key info that you needed on either the Normal or Emergency procedures side. In the sleeve between the two outer pages was a more detailed W&B table, fuel consumption rates at various altitudes and power settings to facilitate quick flight planning, necessary for charter work out in the bush.
I recently looked at a (CASA approved) QRH for a very light training aircraft, and found it was over 60pages long! It included literally hundreds of items, many not even related to operating an aeroplane ( e.g. adjust the seat belt neatly after flight). This new world may create in trainees the idea that it is more important to be able to complete this ridiculously long list of actions (many of which are at best marginally relevant), rather than to focus on the actions and checks needed to operate the aircraft safely and efficiently, and on flying ability. IMO, the present QRH system actually detracts from effective and safe airmanship through distraction via this unnecessary complication. This needs some serious research...
Seabreeze
Last edited by Seabreeze; 26th Sep 2018 at 03:41.
This needs some serious research...
many not even related to operating an aeroplane
As mentioned above, most so called checklists used by Flying schools are amplified operating procedures. By far the safest way to operate most aircraft is to accomplish normal procedures from memory, then use a checklist to “check” you have completed the procedure. Flows and / or mnemonics can be used to help with completing the procedure and the checklist should only be use when you think a procedure has been completed. The checklist should only contain items likely to embarrass or kill you! Including stuff like fastening harnesses, setting radio frequencies or detailed engine run-ups have no place in a checklist.
Its painful flying with pilots of simple aeroplanes who cannot operate without a do list.
Its painful flying with pilots of simple aeroplanes who cannot operate without a do list.
Wiggley
Spot on, I spent many years flying single pilot IFR Ops, always used a flip out checklist, but it was a list, not a novel. I think we are at risk of over striving to "protect" ourselves by including every possible item into a check list. I was always taught that they are for the guidance of wise men and the obeyance of fools.
Quite poor when the operational checklist for an airliner from startup to shutdown literally fits on a single-sided A4 page. The expanded checklist is of course within easy reach, but is only used for abnormal procedures.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You could start an argument about the wisdom of a pre landing gear check on a fixed gear aircraft,
Now ask him if that is the reason, then how come you don't say "Gear up" as part of the after take off check in a Cessna 172? Talk about negative "training". Typical GA.
A simple Flow Check will suffice - top to bottom, left to right. Arrange all the knobs and switches in a pleasing and eye-catching manner.
Then go flying.
Then go flying.
Sheppy, when I fly a fixed gear fixed prop such as a PA28 I still mention in my checks on the ground and in the air: Cowl flaps, Pitch and Gear. What’s the harm in saying them? After nearly 40 years of safe flying it’s served me very well in all GA types up to the PA31.
Muscle memory and good habits forged over a life time.
Muscle memory and good habits forged over a life time.
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 413 Likes
on
218 Posts
All a load of BUMFFCH.
flying a mix of fixed and retractable you are stupid if you do not include gear in your mental checklist, likewise propeller.
My response to the mental challenge on fixed gear is "down and welded".
My response to the mental challenge on fixed gear is "down and welded".
Muscle memory and good habits forged over a life time.
The more I see of checklist use, the more I believe, particularly in single pilot ops, that if you have forgotten a critical item such as GEAR, you will probably also forget to do whatever checklist is supposed to trap that error.
