Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Bank Royal Commission and Aviation

The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Bank Royal Commission and Aviation

Old 30th May 2018, 04:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Australia
Age: 58
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
Bank Royal Commission and Aviation

Lots of speculation in the media about the Banking Royal Commission and a possible credit squeeze, banks not interested in lending to small business, higher interest rates for commercial loans etc.

Another nail in the coffin for general aviation?


CharlieLimaX-Ray is offline  
Old 30th May 2018, 05:43
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by CharlieLimaX-Ray
Lots of speculation in the media about the Banking Royal Commission and a possible credit squeeze, banks not interested in lending to small business, higher interest rates for commercial loans etc.

Another nail in the coffin for general aviation?


CLX,
As it has been impossible for all but a select few aviation companies (not including some pretty large ones) to raise unsecured bank type finance for many years, changes in bank lending policies will have little impact on what little of GA is left.

And ---- a good friend of mine in the finance business makes it quite clear that the fact that CASA can rob an organisation of it's cash flow with (as far as banks and major financial institutions are concerned, forget the theoretical niceties of AAT appeals etc. ) effective impunity means GA has been a nono for many years.

This problem has been raised in inquiry after inquiry into CASA and its behavior.

All roads lead to CASA.

Tootle pip!!
LeadSled is offline  
Old 30th May 2018, 13:59
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,300
Received 211 Likes on 93 Posts
And roads lead to the predatory tactics of the airport leaseholders. When it was announced on the front page of the Sunday paper that they were going to "close Jandakot" my finance application for a new building was cancelled the next morning and I wasn't the only one. Who is going to approve finance for a building knowing that when the lease expires (and they were trying to limit them to five years) the asset will be seized and the tenant can only stay there if they lease it back from the head lease holder at a massive rent? We need a Royal Commission into the predatory and unconscionable behaviour of the people who benefitted enormously from the Airports Act and track where the money went.
Clare Prop is offline  
Old 30th May 2018, 14:34
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Richmond NSW
Posts: 1,345
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
I reckon that the Royal Commission into Banking is merely theatre. (It's certainly a lawyer feeding festival!) Some banking practices being revealed as outrageous as they certainly are or have been. But for a retired High Court Justice to take on such a mission to last a mere 12 months, is simply a favour to the Coalition government and the banks. Sure, bank share prices are a bit down now but I'll bet they'll recover afterwards.
Clare Prop raises another good point, as usual. But since a previous Coalition government saw fit to sell monopolistic airports to their matey spivs, we are stuck with all of this crap.
I've been a small business person for 31 years. My experience is that banks would never lend a cent to me without having my owned real estate to back it.
gerry111 is offline  
Old 30th May 2018, 16:20
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,300
Received 211 Likes on 93 Posts
It was actually the Keating government that brought in the Airports Act, Coalition who handed out leases to developers and under Albanese's watch that they were allowed to run rampant while he sat back and let them interpret the leases in ways that meant the tenants got a very raw deal indeed (and of course Garrett who approved tilt up concrete to replace endangered wildlife habitats). Interestingly it was only Coalition MPs who ever took them to task over their attempts to get freehold and turn the airports into housing estates. The WA Nats were also very cosy with the developers. So...all sides of government are to blame for what crumbs we have now. It would be great to see them all squirm in a Royal Commission.

I'd add that the poor management of many aviation businesses is another reason the banks won't touch them!
Clare Prop is offline  
Old 30th May 2018, 20:57
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Australia/India
Posts: 5,283
Received 416 Likes on 207 Posts
Yep - the Coalition and Labor are about equally to blame for the privatisation of airports and their transformation into shopping/office/warehouse/car parking businesses. Same with leaving CASA to its own devices on the sick joke and expensive hoax called the regulatory ‘reform’ program.

That’s why I call them ‘Laborials’. A pox on all of them for what they’ve done to aviation in Australia.
Lead Balloon is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.