Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Gympie... More Talkies Please!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Jul 2017, 21:15
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Unless CASA issues a formal direction for CAR166 E to apply or declares a Broadcast Area the Council has absolutely no authority to mandate radio carriage. They have no authority over the operation of airborne aircraft.
Vag277 is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2017, 00:16
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Straya
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think Checklist Charlie hinted at what appears to be the real reason.

A ban on night flying and hovering helicopters. Sounds like a ban on...noise.
DancingDog is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2017, 01:09
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 1,393
Received 20 Likes on 6 Posts
Don't discount greedy developers either.
Fris B. Fairing is online now  
Old 31st Jul 2017, 01:15
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Goolwa
Age: 59
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If "near" is a contraction of the word "nearly" then the correct term is a "near hit" as in "the aircraft nearly hit the other aircraft". If it is a description of proximity then "a near miss" would indicate that "the aircraft was in close proximity when it missed the other aircraft", as opposed to a "far miss", i.e. "it missed us by miles". Or you could just reduce it to a simple binary logic of "it missed" or "it hit" :-)
Dexta is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2017, 02:13
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
More appropriate term is "airprox"
Vag277 is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2017, 05:30
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Island
Age: 43
Posts: 553
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Dexta
If "near" is a contraction of the word "nearly" then the correct term is a "near hit" as in "the aircraft nearly hit the other aircraft". If it is a description of proximity then "a near miss" would indicate that "the aircraft was in close proximity when it missed the other aircraft", as opposed to a "far miss", i.e. "it missed us by miles". Or you could just reduce it to a simple binary logic of "it missed" or "it hit" :-)
Aircraft miss each other all the time. It's the near ones and the non-misses that are worrying.
glekichi is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2017, 23:03
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Having seen the likely events up there in the past, I will take a punt that it is all about half the runway being on a slop and the top half blind from the taxiway. Combine that with many sloppy radio operators and you get folk taxiing into aircraft cresting the hill either taking off or landing.

The airfield is a great little place but it is far more unforgiving of fools than most others. It makes the blind ends like Bathurst and Toowoomba loo like non events.

As for helicopters at night being a pain in the butt, is there anywhere that Beckers have not worn out their welcome?
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2017, 01:09
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,290
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
People are ecstatic when rescued by a helicopter. But just don't go training the pilots anywhere near me!
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2017, 02:56
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,509
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Capt Fathom
People are ecstatic when rescued by a helicopter. But just don't go training the pilots anywhere near me!
If the training helicopters are the reason then I'm surprised that a semi-rural council would knock them. More background info required here...





.
Flying Binghi is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2017, 03:43
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 512
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
More background info required here...
I totally agree.

Based on the press report and the council meeting agenda item the whole matter does not make sense. It appears ill conceived, ill advised (that's CAsA) which ultimately suggests its implementation (if it even gets that far) will be just be a big a cockup. Something councils have demonstrated they are excellent at in the past.

The safety case (if one was ever done) would make an interesting read.

I suspect the anti-noise nimby's have put the wind up council who then have come up with their questionable 'safety enhancements'.

CC
Checklist Charlie is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2017, 21:27
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: In my Swag
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Checklist Charlie
I totally agree.

Based on the press report and the council meeting agenda item the whole matter does not make sense. It appears ill conceived, ill advised (that's CAsA) which ultimately suggests its implementation (if it even gets that far) will be just be a big a cockup. Something councils have demonstrated they are excellent at in the past.

The safety case (if one was ever done) would make an interesting read.

I suspect the anti-noise nimby's have put the wind up council who then have come up with their questionable 'safety enhancements'.CC
Further to the initial post. https://www.gympietimes.com.au/news/...-a-fa/3207652/
Eddie Dean is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2017, 22:31
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 512
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm planning on visiting the Gympie Airport open day this coming Sunday, it might be an opportunity to 'engage' some councillors in a discussion.

It does appear from the Gympie Times link above that the noise nimby's and possibly somebody looking at a future land use zoning change just might have influenced this odd apparent outcome.

CC
Checklist Charlie is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2017, 23:39
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Abeam Alice Springs
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the Council have communicated with CASA, then the silo's within CASA still exist, as there was a SQld RAPAC meeting a week ago and the matter was not on the agenda nor raised by anyone presnet including CASA. The CASA RAPAC rep is now looking into it I understand. As was indicated previously, the aerodrome operator (Council in this case) have no authority on the airspace and operations at the the aerodrome unless CASA approval is provided and it is listed in ERSA. Any changes as outlined would have to be justified with incident reports and some form of safety case.
triadic is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2017, 05:26
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,509
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Via The Gympie Times:


The owner of a helicopter training school has criticised the new safety changes at Kybong Airport, saying it is now impossible for helicopters to use the site.
Becker Helicopters owner Captain Mike Becker said the ban on hovering was the same as stopping planes from taxiing.
"It's impossible for a helicopter, if it's going to land there, not to hover," he said.
"If it's upsetting residents who aren't at the airport because they were worried about helicopters flying over the top of them, that's got nothing to do with hovering does it?"
Having invested about $800,000 in purchasing 4ha at the site with the intention of moving some of his business there, the changes - which Capt Becker said his company was not consulted on - had left him wondering what to do now.
He said requests for an urgent meeting with the council had been turned down.
He also questioned the decision to allow residential development at the airport.
"You can't build a house in an industrial area," he said.
According to Capt Becker, the council had been made aware of incidents during a meeting in April 2016, and that the Australian Transport Safety Bureau recorded only seven incidents at the airport.
A Gympie Regional Council spokeswoman said the council was encouraging feedback from all members of the community through the airport draft master plan next week.


https://www.gympietimes.com.au/news/...sible/3208561/





.
Flying Binghi is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2017, 19:35
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SE Qld, Australia
Age: 77
Posts: 1,169
Received 39 Likes on 26 Posts
There's a balance to the above bleat from Beckers - I think it would be fair to say that Becker Helicopters are generally unpopular with the populace of the entire Sunshine Coast hinterland, not just those of Gympie.
Dora-9 is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2017, 06:20
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,509
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Dora-9
There's a balance to the above bleat from Beckers - I think it would be fair to say that Becker Helicopters are generally unpopular with the populace of the entire Sunshine Coast hinterland, not just those of Gympie.
"Bleat" ! ...They've bought a site at the airport that they may not be able to use and the council wont meet with them!
A justifiable 'bleat' i woulda thought.





.
Flying Binghi is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2017, 06:41
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,290
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
Will be interesting to get some feedback from anyone who attended this weekend's fly-in.
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2017, 21:02
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is the council controlled by development sharks? most of them seem to be up that way. Caloundra council made a grab for their airport for "development."
thorn bird is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2017, 22:46
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Do the council have any in house aviation expertise or have they engaged a consultant to provide appropriate advice?

Seem not to date.

They have no power to 'control' anything above the ground, which many councils seem to think they have.
cogwheel is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2017, 23:12
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
An attack on one needs to be treated as an attack on all. Otherwise the developers and NIMBYS will pick off airports one by one.
Sunfish is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.