Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Small Aircraft Jet A powered Crash Worthiness

The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Small Aircraft Jet A powered Crash Worthiness

Old 6th Jul 2017, 01:21
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Oz
Posts: 902
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Small Aircraft Jet A powered Crash Worthiness

A question was asked of me which I don't know the answer to.

Typical EFATO situation (typical 4 seat light aircraft) results in controlled low IAS descent into the trees (or forced landing). Fuel tanks are ruptured as the wings come off etc. Is jet fuel less explosive in this situation than avgas. Is there less chance of fire in this event with a Jet A powered diesel aircraft than a typical Avgas powered version.

I would have though that Jet a being a heavier fuel would vaporise less or slower than Avgas resulting in less chance of a fireball.

Anyone got ideas.
nomorecatering is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2017, 01:28
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: WA
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Im no expert but just looking at the differences in flash point between Jet A1 and Avgas makes the avgas look a lot more volatile.
Ignition of Fuels - SKYbrary Aviation Safety
YPJT is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2017, 07:23
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You can stand in a pond of Avtur and drop lighted matches all day without harm, not so with Avgas. In days of yore jets used a wide cut fuel with Avgas like qualities. It was banned for use by the airlines because of its flammability at some point in history, and the safer Avtur products got the tick.

JP-4, which was 50/50 kerosene and gasoline mix, was used by the USAF during Vietnam and they later changed to JP-8, a kerosene, because of JP-4 propensity to ignite.

Demonstration Jet fuel at 1:30, Avgas 9:15

Brian Abraham is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2017, 12:58
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Darwin, Australia
Age: 53
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
You can stand in a pond of Avtur and drop lighted matches all day without harm,
The flash point of Jet A1 is around 38 degrees C at typical sea level conditions. Once the fuel temperature is above this it will go bang just as hard - TWA flight 800 was a classic example of this.

Jet A1 also has a higher energy density per litre, and a significantly lower spontaneous ignition temperature. So if you spill fuel onto a hot surface like an exhaust, without an ignition source Jet A1 will ignite at a lower temperature than AVGAS.
werbil is online now  
Old 8th Jul 2017, 15:27
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: australia
Posts: 376
Received 26 Likes on 14 Posts
The fact that refuelling with passengers on board is permitted on some AVTUR aircraft but under no circumstances on AVGAS fuelled aircraft says something about the volatility and safety of a fuel and its propensity to cause a dangerous situation if mishandled.
mikewil is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2017, 17:18
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,882
Received 362 Likes on 192 Posts
mikewil, because of the relative flash points, Avgas is -40°C, Jet A is 38°C. A 78°C difference. The flash point of a volatile material is the lowest temperature at which vapours of the material will ignite, when given an ignition source. The liquid itself does not burn, it's the vapour it gives off, hence the lower the flash point, the greater the risk.
megan is online now  
Old 9th Jul 2017, 10:21
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: OZ
Posts: 1,116
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
That's the old LAME's party piece. Provided there is a few cm gap to the top of a container of avgas, you can flick butts into it and they go out with a bit of a hiss. Scary to watch first time! Equally, avtur is the same. The reason is that the avgas vapour is way too rich to burn and the avtur way too lean. Unfortunately that horrible JP4 was just right to burn at room temp, hence civvies don't touch it.
mustafagander is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2017, 21:15
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Adeliade
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On a hot day and on a hot tramac jet1 is more dangerous than avgas. Same as oil onto a hot turbo. Oil will flash off and will burn where avgas will trend to evaporate and a fire start from a secondary ignition source.
At the end off the day caution should be used around anything flammable.

There is a term that i cant think of at the moment that explains why avtur is more dangerous on a hot day
Connedrod is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.