Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Reporting breaches to CASA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Apr 2017, 10:00
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
Logging capabilities of EFIS now selected to "off". Likewise transponder? Your log and maintenance release are now synchronised. Alternatively, EFIS,and transponder breakers pulled so that there is virtually no record of flight at all.


What has been missed now is that the intent of reporting was to trap emerging safety issues, not compliance issues. The ATSB/CASA MOU is a poisoned document.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2017, 10:05
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Squawk7700
Unfortunately this isn't quite correct.

The name and address scenario above comes from section 456aa of the Crimes Act 1958 where a Police Officer suspects on reasonable grounds that you have committed an offence and you must provide your name and address.

Your obligations when driving a motor vehicle are covered under the transport act and you must produce your licence on request and or provide information as required to be able to identify you.

.

In Victoria, it's the Road Safety Act, s59(1) that gives certain persons, including police, power to stop a vehicle and require production of licence, and the name and address of the driver.

Kaz
kaz3g is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2017, 10:17
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,870
Received 191 Likes on 98 Posts
Originally Posted by kaz3g
In Victoria, it's the Road Safety Act, s59(1) that gives certain persons, including police, power to stop a vehicle and require production of licence, and the name and address of the driver.

Kaz
Thanks Kaz, that was a dopey moment on my behalf, thanks for noticing and clarifying!
Squawk7700 is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2017, 03:06
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: australia
Posts: 1,681
Received 43 Likes on 28 Posts
Do they trawl yr Log book if they get hold of it (..since you are not obliged to incriminate yrself with word, deed or doc ) ? Yes they do.
Will you get prosecuted if there is an oversight. Yes they did.
Late back from a project out in the boonies and and BFR due 2 weeks before. Immediately rectifed..but no matter. Done...and busted.
If it was a 'mate'..wouldnt happen.

Cronyism and corruption is alive and well in CAsA. And inconsistency is their byword.

As Ovation states...Hemple and Quadrio. Chalk and very smelly Cheese.
Hemple kills a pax. No worries...well there must have been a bit of CYA angst in the Fort
Quadrio wasnt even flying that helicopter.!!
And CAsA did what and spent how much.?? And the overall benefit to aviation safety was...as usual ZILCH.

Currawong...you better make sure your log book is 100% squeaky clean before you hand it over.
If there is something in there, as in my case , Bang you're dead...you do NOT have to self incriminate.
aroa is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.