Tamworth industry rally - friday 6 may 2016
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tamworth industry rally - friday 6 may 2016
INDUSTRY RALLY TAMWORTH AIRPORT
** YOUR INDUSTRY NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT **
1 PM - FRIDAY, 6TH MAY 2016
HANGAR 6, Tamworth Regional Airport NSW, Australia.
To the Australian Aviation Industry,
YOUR INDUSTRY NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT - 6th MAY 2016
I am calling on the support of all pilots, aircraft owners, aviation business owners and operators to attend our industry rally in Tamworth, on Friday 6th May 2016.
This is your opportunity to be seen and to be heard!
The industry’s leading associations, peak-bodies and aviation personalities, will be in attendance. All standing with the pilots, aircraft owners, aviation businesses and operators of our industry - united in the call for change.
We are calling on the government take immediate measures to end the regulatory nightmare that has destroyed our charter, flight training and maintenance industries. Made Australia uncompetitive on the global aviation stage. Eroded essential air services connecting regional Australia, disconnecting townships and isolating communities.
A regulatory nightmare that has forced an entire industry into collapse and thousands of hard working men and women into bankruptcy.
In attendance, representing the government will be;
The Deputy Prime Minister, the Hon Barnaby Joyce
The Department of Infrastructure and Transport, the Hon Darren Chester
The Chairman of the Board, Civil Aviation Safety Authority, Mr Jeff Boyd.
For too long, the Australian aviation industry has been disenfranchised the right to economic prosperity through failed policy and excess regulation and compliance costs. We are an industry failed by political rhetoric and empty promises by the Labor, Liberal and The Nationals alike.
Our industry has been pushed to the wall, lives destroyed, families broken, retirements ruined and homes lost.
A prosperous future for aviation in this country can only be assured through a regulatory framework that is balanced, fair and representative of the needs and aspirations of industry itself. Most importantly, it must be accountable to industry, the people it is there to serve.
I am calling on each and every aviation participant that cares for this industry to show their support and attend. We can no longer afford to sit back and watch the destruction of our industry. Stand with us as we call on government to take action.
Help send Canberra a clear message
Show your support. Fly in or drive in. Contact your aviation networks, email, sms, phone. Lets send the government a clear message, that enough is enough.
Thank you for your support, and I look forward to seeing you all at the event.
Best regards,
BENJAMIN MORGAN
Chief Executive - Aviation Advertiser
Telephone: (02) 8215 6292
Mobile: 0415 577 724
Email: [email protected]
Mailing Address:
PO BOX 465
Edgecliff NSW 2027
Australia.
RALLY COMMENCES AT 1PM, 6TH MAY 2016
HANGAR 6, TAMWORTH AIRPORT
EVENT SCHEDULE
1pm - Arrival
1pm-2pm - FREE BBQ lunch and drinks - Sponsored by Aviation Advertiser & AOPA
2pm - Government representatives arrive
2pm-2:30pm - Closed door meeting between Government and Industry Associations
2:30pm-3pm - Short presentation to rally from industry representatives
2:30pm-4pm - Open Q&A between rally attendees and government
4pm-6pm - Tamworth AeroClub Post Event Drinks
** YOUR INDUSTRY NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT **
1 PM - FRIDAY, 6TH MAY 2016
HANGAR 6, Tamworth Regional Airport NSW, Australia.
To the Australian Aviation Industry,
YOUR INDUSTRY NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT - 6th MAY 2016
I am calling on the support of all pilots, aircraft owners, aviation business owners and operators to attend our industry rally in Tamworth, on Friday 6th May 2016.
This is your opportunity to be seen and to be heard!
The industry’s leading associations, peak-bodies and aviation personalities, will be in attendance. All standing with the pilots, aircraft owners, aviation businesses and operators of our industry - united in the call for change.
We are calling on the government take immediate measures to end the regulatory nightmare that has destroyed our charter, flight training and maintenance industries. Made Australia uncompetitive on the global aviation stage. Eroded essential air services connecting regional Australia, disconnecting townships and isolating communities.
A regulatory nightmare that has forced an entire industry into collapse and thousands of hard working men and women into bankruptcy.
In attendance, representing the government will be;
The Deputy Prime Minister, the Hon Barnaby Joyce
The Department of Infrastructure and Transport, the Hon Darren Chester
The Chairman of the Board, Civil Aviation Safety Authority, Mr Jeff Boyd.
For too long, the Australian aviation industry has been disenfranchised the right to economic prosperity through failed policy and excess regulation and compliance costs. We are an industry failed by political rhetoric and empty promises by the Labor, Liberal and The Nationals alike.
Our industry has been pushed to the wall, lives destroyed, families broken, retirements ruined and homes lost.
A prosperous future for aviation in this country can only be assured through a regulatory framework that is balanced, fair and representative of the needs and aspirations of industry itself. Most importantly, it must be accountable to industry, the people it is there to serve.
I am calling on each and every aviation participant that cares for this industry to show their support and attend. We can no longer afford to sit back and watch the destruction of our industry. Stand with us as we call on government to take action.
Help send Canberra a clear message
Show your support. Fly in or drive in. Contact your aviation networks, email, sms, phone. Lets send the government a clear message, that enough is enough.
Thank you for your support, and I look forward to seeing you all at the event.
Best regards,
BENJAMIN MORGAN
Chief Executive - Aviation Advertiser
Telephone: (02) 8215 6292
Mobile: 0415 577 724
Email: [email protected]
Mailing Address:
PO BOX 465
Edgecliff NSW 2027
Australia.
RALLY COMMENCES AT 1PM, 6TH MAY 2016
HANGAR 6, TAMWORTH AIRPORT
EVENT SCHEDULE
1pm - Arrival
1pm-2pm - FREE BBQ lunch and drinks - Sponsored by Aviation Advertiser & AOPA
2pm - Government representatives arrive
2pm-2:30pm - Closed door meeting between Government and Industry Associations
2:30pm-3pm - Short presentation to rally from industry representatives
2:30pm-4pm - Open Q&A between rally attendees and government
4pm-6pm - Tamworth AeroClub Post Event Drinks
Last edited by aviationadvertiser; 26th Apr 2016 at 06:28.
I really wish you much success, Benjamin.
But sadly, I think that Barnaby will attend and say all the right things. After all, he is fighting to retain his seat at the upcoming election.
And after the election, nothing will change.
I recently re-read Bill Pike's: "Open letter to Mr John Anderson" in the Jan/ Feb 2003 AOPA magazine. He was fairly passionate then regarding CASA. But thirteen years later, nothing has improved. Quite the opposite in fact.
But sadly, I think that Barnaby will attend and say all the right things. After all, he is fighting to retain his seat at the upcoming election.
And after the election, nothing will change.
I recently re-read Bill Pike's: "Open letter to Mr John Anderson" in the Jan/ Feb 2003 AOPA magazine. He was fairly passionate then regarding CASA. But thirteen years later, nothing has improved. Quite the opposite in fact.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Regarding the timing of the event, it was confirmed only a couple of days ago, that the Deputy PM, Minister for Infrastructure & Transport, and the Chairman of CASA would be available on the Friday 6th May 2016 in Tamworth. Given they are now in the election cycle, we take what we can get. So it's happening in one week, Friday 6th May 2016 from 1pm.
I along with many others am giving up my time to be there - demanding that our industry be heard. I call on each and everyone of you to show your support and stand with us. We have an opportunity here to set the stage for change. Come along, engage with your representatives, and support the call for change.
If you genuinely want a future for small to medium sized aviation in Australia, then we are going to have to fight for it. We can no longer arm-chair debate the issues. We must stand up and be seen and heard.
I along with many others am giving up my time to be there - demanding that our industry be heard. I call on each and everyone of you to show your support and stand with us. We have an opportunity here to set the stage for change. Come along, engage with your representatives, and support the call for change.
If you genuinely want a future for small to medium sized aviation in Australia, then we are going to have to fight for it. We can no longer arm-chair debate the issues. We must stand up and be seen and heard.
I could, Dick but it's pretty lengthy..
"Dear Minister,
There are a number of matters that are presently of great concern to us, and I beg your indulgence while I bring them to your attention.
I was appalled recently when discussing the examinations process with a very senior member of the section writing the rules to hear him say, to my horror, in response to my plea that the system be more simplified like that in the United States: "you wouldn't want anything that easy out here would you"?
Minister, that IS what I want! Flying a Cessna 172 between two properties in the Outback is not rocket science: There is little reason to be required to know the difference between stoichiometric ratio and the saturated adiabatic lapse rate to safely perform this task. CASA just loves hurdles, (such as AOC's for example) and I believe that our examination system is more in the nature of a hurdle than performing any useful task.
Our exams system has been put in the hands of a monopolistic private body, and one operating for profit. Any person wishing to become a pilot pays its rates, which are many times those applicable tin the United States. This is a dreadful state of affairs. Who in CASA authorised this? Were tenders called? It is surely appalling that the pilot licence exams should have been gifted to a monopolistic private body, operating purely for profit, which has resulted in the exclusion of all flying training organisations from supervising commercial and ATPL exams.
The exorbitant rates charged are mandatory - the hopeful pilot has no choices available. Even the private pilot is forced into this uncompetitive system, where price-fixing is irrelevant, because there is untrammelled authority in the monopoly to set whatever rates it chooses.
What is wrong with the many highly-qualified training organisations throughout Australia having the right to compete with the private provider, as occurs in the rest of the commercial world?
On another note, I understand that your department proposes to allow councils to redevelop ex-Commonwealth airfields given them under the ALOP scheme some years ago, (accompanied by a grant as I remember) into non-aviation activities.
This would be a sad day for aviation. One only has to observe the residential development permitted under the arrival and departure ends of runways to see how irresponsible some councils can be in aviation matters. Many councils are very responsible, but each airport would require only one anti-aviation or even corrupt council to see that airport turned into windfall profits at the expense of aviation, and so be lost forever.
Developers are always lurking, and their power is great. Councils must not have such temptations put their way.
AOPA suggests that where councils wish to reduce the burden they claim the airport is to them, (and in my opinion it is the inefficient way that councils administer the airport that is often the problem,) local aviation bodies should be asked for expressions of interest to run the airport for the benefit of aviation.
I emphasise that I'm not asking for them to be privatised. AOPA would be happy to work with your Department to achieve and administer such a scheme. Anything would be better than thrusting the possibility of windfall profits under the nose of some councils."
................................
That is only a small part of Bill Pike's letter. I'm getting sore fingers typing it. And thirsty. But, Dick if you are prepared to send me a slab of Coopers Pale Ale, then I'll provide the rest...
"Dear Minister,
There are a number of matters that are presently of great concern to us, and I beg your indulgence while I bring them to your attention.
I was appalled recently when discussing the examinations process with a very senior member of the section writing the rules to hear him say, to my horror, in response to my plea that the system be more simplified like that in the United States: "you wouldn't want anything that easy out here would you"?
Minister, that IS what I want! Flying a Cessna 172 between two properties in the Outback is not rocket science: There is little reason to be required to know the difference between stoichiometric ratio and the saturated adiabatic lapse rate to safely perform this task. CASA just loves hurdles, (such as AOC's for example) and I believe that our examination system is more in the nature of a hurdle than performing any useful task.
Our exams system has been put in the hands of a monopolistic private body, and one operating for profit. Any person wishing to become a pilot pays its rates, which are many times those applicable tin the United States. This is a dreadful state of affairs. Who in CASA authorised this? Were tenders called? It is surely appalling that the pilot licence exams should have been gifted to a monopolistic private body, operating purely for profit, which has resulted in the exclusion of all flying training organisations from supervising commercial and ATPL exams.
The exorbitant rates charged are mandatory - the hopeful pilot has no choices available. Even the private pilot is forced into this uncompetitive system, where price-fixing is irrelevant, because there is untrammelled authority in the monopoly to set whatever rates it chooses.
What is wrong with the many highly-qualified training organisations throughout Australia having the right to compete with the private provider, as occurs in the rest of the commercial world?
On another note, I understand that your department proposes to allow councils to redevelop ex-Commonwealth airfields given them under the ALOP scheme some years ago, (accompanied by a grant as I remember) into non-aviation activities.
This would be a sad day for aviation. One only has to observe the residential development permitted under the arrival and departure ends of runways to see how irresponsible some councils can be in aviation matters. Many councils are very responsible, but each airport would require only one anti-aviation or even corrupt council to see that airport turned into windfall profits at the expense of aviation, and so be lost forever.
Developers are always lurking, and their power is great. Councils must not have such temptations put their way.
AOPA suggests that where councils wish to reduce the burden they claim the airport is to them, (and in my opinion it is the inefficient way that councils administer the airport that is often the problem,) local aviation bodies should be asked for expressions of interest to run the airport for the benefit of aviation.
I emphasise that I'm not asking for them to be privatised. AOPA would be happy to work with your Department to achieve and administer such a scheme. Anything would be better than thrusting the possibility of windfall profits under the nose of some councils."
................................
That is only a small part of Bill Pike's letter. I'm getting sore fingers typing it. And thirsty. But, Dick if you are prepared to send me a slab of Coopers Pale Ale, then I'll provide the rest...
Ben, All good if that is so.
But please don't get too carried away with any exaggeration that cannot be supported by facts. (And also remember that there is a Federal election just around the corner.)
So what do you realistically expect to achieve?
Perhaps always be aware of those who may attempt to stroke your ego and possibly duchess you accordingly??
(Dick, I do prefer not to be mercenary but my offer of the slab of Coopers Pale Ale is still available to you..)
But please don't get too carried away with any exaggeration that cannot be supported by facts. (And also remember that there is a Federal election just around the corner.)
So what do you realistically expect to achieve?
Perhaps always be aware of those who may attempt to stroke your ego and possibly duchess you accordingly??
(Dick, I do prefer not to be mercenary but my offer of the slab of Coopers Pale Ale is still available to you..)
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Absolutely correct - the federal election is now here...
As such, the issues that are negatively impacting our industry need addressing. At just about every level, the CASA regulatory framework is damaging small to medium sized aviation enterprise.
What needs to be changed? The entire platform.
As such, the issues that are negatively impacting our industry need addressing. At just about every level, the CASA regulatory framework is damaging small to medium sized aviation enterprise.
What needs to be changed? The entire platform.
It is the small Australian family-owned businesses that will service the National Party's key constituents.
...and it is small Australian family-owned businesses that are damaged by European-style over-regulation.
If the Government is serious about "innovation" and regional development (and we know Malcolm Turnbull loves his cities and his busses, trains and trams) they need to examine the system to achieve the policy outcomes.
...and it is small Australian family-owned businesses that are damaged by European-style over-regulation.
If the Government is serious about "innovation" and regional development (and we know Malcolm Turnbull loves his cities and his busses, trains and trams) they need to examine the system to achieve the policy outcomes.
More power to your arm, Ben.
Some paradigm issues that I suggest you take into consideration in your strategic thinking, so that any momentum you build and effort you are making are focussed where it may have some chance of having some effect.
The practical reality is that while ever the Coalition and Labour effectively take turns in government, they both win every election. Each 'side' merely takes its turn to feast on the treasure of the body politic.
These days, the job of the bureaucracy is to protect the relevant minister. Whether that happens to result in something that's in the public interest is a matter of mere coincidence. The bureaucracy is effectively now a support system for the political advisers for the ministers who come and go, no matter to what party they happen to belong. The political advisers decide whether the minister is happy or sad, and that determines whether the bureaucrats keep their jobs.
Both 'sides' effectively abdicated their responsibility for the aviation industry to the bureaucracy a couple of decades or so ago. This makes ministers and their advisers happy, because they can disclaim responsibility for aviation regulation on a bi-partisan and 'public interest' basis. That's why the bureaucracy proceeded to build (and continues to build) the enormous, complex mess that is the aviation regulatory system. My view is that it is now impossible for anyone to work out what the amalgamation of the Civil Aviation Act, 1988 regulations, 1998 regulations, Civil Aviation Orders, Manuals of Standards, Directions, Determinations and, most importantly, exemptions, actually means as a matter of practicality. It's now mainly a life support system for all the people who build and continue to build on the mess: The bigger the mess, the longer it will take them to clean it up (on six figure salaries, year after year).
Some of them seriously believe they are making a positive contribution to safety. Many of the people in AVMED would fall into this category.
This abdication is also the explanation for why nothing changes despite all of the matters identified by Senate Committees and inquiries and reviews and coronials etc. Witness all those Senate enquiries that don't result in the Senators walking into the Senate and voting to give effect to the strong opinions expressed during Committee hearings. It's just pantomime.
Short point for you: Don't bother wasting energy on the tweedle dumb and tweedle dumber. The only glimmer of hope for GA lies in the laps of independents like Nick X.
Therefore, I'd suggest it would be very worthwhile finding out whether Tony Windsor has any knowledge of the plight of GA, any sympathy for the plight of GA and any inclination to use his vote to support change to improve the lot of GA. If the answer to each of those questions is 'no', meeting with and talking to Chester, Joyce and Windsor is - in my opinion based on the observation of the similar circumstances have arisen with depressing regularity over the last couple of decades and more - a complete waste of your and everyone else's time and energy. Focus has to be on the people who are actually prepared to legislate for change.
Some paradigm issues that I suggest you take into consideration in your strategic thinking, so that any momentum you build and effort you are making are focussed where it may have some chance of having some effect.
The practical reality is that while ever the Coalition and Labour effectively take turns in government, they both win every election. Each 'side' merely takes its turn to feast on the treasure of the body politic.
These days, the job of the bureaucracy is to protect the relevant minister. Whether that happens to result in something that's in the public interest is a matter of mere coincidence. The bureaucracy is effectively now a support system for the political advisers for the ministers who come and go, no matter to what party they happen to belong. The political advisers decide whether the minister is happy or sad, and that determines whether the bureaucrats keep their jobs.
Both 'sides' effectively abdicated their responsibility for the aviation industry to the bureaucracy a couple of decades or so ago. This makes ministers and their advisers happy, because they can disclaim responsibility for aviation regulation on a bi-partisan and 'public interest' basis. That's why the bureaucracy proceeded to build (and continues to build) the enormous, complex mess that is the aviation regulatory system. My view is that it is now impossible for anyone to work out what the amalgamation of the Civil Aviation Act, 1988 regulations, 1998 regulations, Civil Aviation Orders, Manuals of Standards, Directions, Determinations and, most importantly, exemptions, actually means as a matter of practicality. It's now mainly a life support system for all the people who build and continue to build on the mess: The bigger the mess, the longer it will take them to clean it up (on six figure salaries, year after year).
Some of them seriously believe they are making a positive contribution to safety. Many of the people in AVMED would fall into this category.
This abdication is also the explanation for why nothing changes despite all of the matters identified by Senate Committees and inquiries and reviews and coronials etc. Witness all those Senate enquiries that don't result in the Senators walking into the Senate and voting to give effect to the strong opinions expressed during Committee hearings. It's just pantomime.
Short point for you: Don't bother wasting energy on the tweedle dumb and tweedle dumber. The only glimmer of hope for GA lies in the laps of independents like Nick X.
Therefore, I'd suggest it would be very worthwhile finding out whether Tony Windsor has any knowledge of the plight of GA, any sympathy for the plight of GA and any inclination to use his vote to support change to improve the lot of GA. If the answer to each of those questions is 'no', meeting with and talking to Chester, Joyce and Windsor is - in my opinion based on the observation of the similar circumstances have arisen with depressing regularity over the last couple of decades and more - a complete waste of your and everyone else's time and energy. Focus has to be on the people who are actually prepared to legislate for change.
leady - completely correct. The only way to fix the mess is to break up CASA and start again with a clean slate, a new act and new people. It is not possible to fix this mess while remaining inside the system.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A prosperous future for aviation in this country can only be assured through a regulatory framework that is balanced, fair and representative of the needs and aspirations of industry itself. Most importantly, it must be accountable to industry, the people it is there to serve.
Its really that simple.
Its really that simple.
A prosperous future for aviation in this country can only be assured through a regulatory framework that is balanced, fair and representative of the needs and aspirations of industry itself. Most importantly, it must be accountable to industry, the people it is there to serve.
Its really that simple.
Its really that simple.
It's not that simple. The regulatory framework is not there to serve the industry.
The regulatory framework is there to protect the public from the dangerous anarchy that would break out if the industry did not have the wise but firm straightjacket imposed on it by the experts in CASA.
But for the regulatory framework created by the masterpiece comprising the Civil Aviation Act, 1988 regulations, 1998 regulations, Civil Aviation Orders, Manuals of Standards, Directions, Determinations and exemptions, and all those wise people in CASA, you know full well that you would go wild and start doing stupidly dangerous things.
The wise but firm straightjacket is for your own, and the public's, good. Surely you feel safer as a consequence of Part 61 and are gagging at the prospect of the tsunami of safety that will happen under Parts 142/145?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks Lead Balloon - food for thought I am sure - Nothing will work in aviation until such time that the regulator is accountable to industry - period. Only when the regulator is held to account, will balanced and sensible regulation be delivered.
I say again...
A prosperous future for aviation in this country can only be assured through a regulatory framework that is balanced, fair and representative of the needs and aspirations of industry itself. Most importantly, it must be accountable to industry, the people it is there to serve.
Maybe we all need to be reminded that the Safety Regulator is there, elected by the people, for the people...
Its 2016, not 1947. If we are indeed in the ideas boom and Australia is positioning itself for the next 50 years of economic growth and prosperity - then its time we took a good long look at our regulatory framework and how it plays the lead role in advancing aviation and encouraging investment and development.
Or.... we do nothing - and argue from the sidelines. Stick it out with what we have and watch an entire industry collapse around us.
I say again...
A prosperous future for aviation in this country can only be assured through a regulatory framework that is balanced, fair and representative of the needs and aspirations of industry itself. Most importantly, it must be accountable to industry, the people it is there to serve.
Maybe we all need to be reminded that the Safety Regulator is there, elected by the people, for the people...
Its 2016, not 1947. If we are indeed in the ideas boom and Australia is positioning itself for the next 50 years of economic growth and prosperity - then its time we took a good long look at our regulatory framework and how it plays the lead role in advancing aviation and encouraging investment and development.
Or.... we do nothing - and argue from the sidelines. Stick it out with what we have and watch an entire industry collapse around us.
Again, more power to your arm, Ben.
I earnestly hope you use that power to the best advantage.
My long experience and observation leads me to believe that using any power you might have to best advantage will not involve appeals to or correspondence with the Coalition or Labor. As those crusty old rockers The Who said: I won't be fooled again...
I earnestly hope you use that power to the best advantage.
My long experience and observation leads me to believe that using any power you might have to best advantage will not involve appeals to or correspondence with the Coalition or Labor. As those crusty old rockers The Who said: I won't be fooled again...
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Queensland
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Has Tony Windsor been invited to this rally? I reckon he would talk more sense than the other 3 combined. Also it would be useful if he was made aware of all the problems faced by GA. Especially useful if he ends up holding the balance of power after this election.
Spoke to Tony W last night and yes he is coming.
Not sure what his position is on aviation, really, but the track record of the Nationals as Transport Ministers indicates a complete lack of testicular fortitude in the aviation department.
Not sure what his position is on aviation, really, but the track record of the Nationals as Transport Ministers indicates a complete lack of testicular fortitude in the aviation department.
