Do I really need an ADF endorsement?
Thread Starter
Do I really need an ADF endorsement?
Hi Guys, I did a search but came up with nothing.
I have recently obtained an MEIR with endorsements in GNSS,VOR and ILS. Is it worth adding the ADF? From what I hear it's not really used in NZ anymore, at least not by Nelson and Mt Cook.
Are they still using it in Aussie much?
I have recently obtained an MEIR with endorsements in GNSS,VOR and ILS. Is it worth adding the ADF? From what I hear it's not really used in NZ anymore, at least not by Nelson and Mt Cook.
Are they still using it in Aussie much?
Every aerodrome with an NDB now has an RNAV approach - we tend to go from RNAV to RNAV now and only fly NDBs to maintain currency.
...but not sure why we bother!
...but not sure why we bother!
If you not ADF endorsed on your licence, is it still be legal to tune into the nearest radio station to gain updated operational information such as the ABC news?
And I thought the FAA was anal. God bless America.
Does it even matter any more because part 61 is just azimuth or CDI guidance, 2D and 3D, negating the need to be tested on an NDB now? Or wait, have we just identified another issue with the changeover?
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Australia at the moment
Posts: 177
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Question; if a port has NDB and DME only, no RNAV approach, can you legally do a DME arrival using the NDB for azimuth guidance? I don't think you can if you are not current or have a rating on NDB. Or even the VOR out of service.
If your GPS is pzzzzzssst as said before or RAIM not available and have to go back to ground based navaids.
I think you would be stuffed, and as stated before good for alternate.
Craven.
If your GPS is pzzzzzssst as said before or RAIM not available and have to go back to ground based navaids.
I think you would be stuffed, and as stated before good for alternate.
Craven.
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: rangaville
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All good until the GPS goes pzzzsssttt .....
or their VOR's, coz they're going too
Last edited by Jack Ranga; 6th Sep 2014 at 04:27.
Sprucegoose
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Get an ADF endorsement, because no one will let you fly their aeroplane unless you know how to do an NDB. Because that's how we did it when men were men! 
GPS? Pffft, why use modern technology when you can use a 70 year old piece of crap!
GPS? Pffft, why use modern technology when you can use a 70 year old piece of crap!
The domestic A320 don't have an ADF fitted! The B773 and B789 don't have ADF fitted! The replacement A320 will not have ADF fitted either.
However the next job you have will probably still require NDB approaches if Airways have not pulled them out so you should really have it on your licence.
However the next job you have will probably still require NDB approaches if Airways have not pulled them out so you should really have it on your licence.
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: ...second left, past the lights.
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Just did my CAANZ IFR renewal (jet/Multi crew) and the form said for Mandatory items: "GNSS and VOR OR NDB approach competency..."
Australia I think is catching up as an NDB was required a year ago but can not confirm this now.
For smaller types and regionals it would be advisable (& great practice) to be endorsed but for heavier jet types the NDB is becoming more and more irrelevant as GPS & IRS navigation reliability can get you down to a bee's d#*k.
Happy Landings
Australia I think is catching up as an NDB was required a year ago but can not confirm this now.
For smaller types and regionals it would be advisable (& great practice) to be endorsed but for heavier jet types the NDB is becoming more and more irrelevant as GPS & IRS navigation reliability can get you down to a bee's d#*k.
Happy Landings
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Many of the posts above are irrelevant, as the OP is in NZ. So, in NZ:
You can use any navaid you like, enroute. You don't need an alternate just because the destination only has a GPS approach. VOR approaches are available all over the country.
So, in NZ, I can see no reason to put NDB approaches on the IR, unless your next job requires it. (Which it usually doesn't.)
At least, that's the advice I used to give between about 2008 & 2011. I don't imagine NZ has gone backwards since!
Australia, different story altogether. Different advice required.
You can use any navaid you like, enroute. You don't need an alternate just because the destination only has a GPS approach. VOR approaches are available all over the country.
So, in NZ, I can see no reason to put NDB approaches on the IR, unless your next job requires it. (Which it usually doesn't.)
At least, that's the advice I used to give between about 2008 & 2011. I don't imagine NZ has gone backwards since!
Australia, different story altogether. Different advice required.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south pacific vagrant
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
might not ever see a need for it legally but tracking needles is a handy skill for the tool box.
never know when you might be down to a vor needle on a rmi.
never know when you might be down to a vor needle on a rmi.
As has been mentioned here, Mt Cook do still perform NDB approaches.
If you want a job in the links, it does pay to have the NDB endorsement as it is one less thing for them to knock you back with.
If you want a job in the links, it does pay to have the NDB endorsement as it is one less thing for them to knock you back with.