Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Reports of a light aircraft down in Blue Mountains

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Reports of a light aircraft down in Blue Mountains

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th May 2014, 08:33
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Back too the hot bits again
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi homesick,
I think you would find that most fire services would not have a clue when it comes to rescue of aircraft with caps ( definitely the case with my local services)
There is a first responder instruction list from the caps website, from memory you have to physically cut the actuation cable at the baggage door
with special cutters if possible.
I read Recently in the US a cirrus pilot pulled his caps handle only for the rocket to fire but did not pull the chute out, he still managed to land but with a 30 ft cord and spent rocket casing dangling behind. Inadvertent flight into IMC I think it was
Ethel the Aardvark is offline  
Old 11th May 2014, 09:43
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,509
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
...don't think there's anything to be questioned. 85 totally successful parachute landings without a fatality...
Whata bout this one...








.
Flying Binghi is offline  
Old 11th May 2014, 09:55
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Perth - Western Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Binghi - That's a very sobering video - but isn't it an excellent reminder about "situational awareness" (read - other aircraft in your vicinity)?
No-one is going to survive a mid-air that results in a fireball - parachute or no parachute.

Survivors of midair plane crash horrified - People: Tales of survival - TODAY.com
onetrack is offline  
Old 11th May 2014, 10:16
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 74
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
No-one is going to survive a mid-air that results in a fireball - parachute or no parachute
Its amazing that the parachute lines didn't burn through
Arnold E is offline  
Old 11th May 2014, 12:56
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With a good landing site of course it's better to force land !
that presumes you are well trained current and practice the things!
No, that presumes you can really sensibly judge landing sites from 2000 feet above. Statitics clearly show you can't. Well, YOU, of course, can, being the superior aviator we know you as. But Joe Average Pilot can't. I can't, for sure.

You can make up hypotheticals all day long. So far, the numbers are quite cleary against you. But you knew that...
thborchert is offline  
Old 11th May 2014, 12:58
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Binghi,

it is believed the chute was triggered by the mid-air crash, not by the occupants who died instantaneously.
thborchert is offline  
Old 11th May 2014, 13:12
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Gerry, at the risk of taking the bait here, I think you mean at rich of peak mate. Highest CHT's and cylinder pressure occurs at peak and up to 200F rich of peak.
Mark, just for accuracy sake, this occurs at aroun 35-50dF ROP, past 75 it starts dropping.

Jabawocky is offline  
Old 11th May 2014, 23:12
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Enzed
Posts: 2,289
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VH-XXX: 27/09, go ahead, be my guest... so you could land an SR22 here over the fence at 75-80 knots?

https://maps.google.com/maps?q=lawso...ralia&t=h&z=13
Before making my post I did have a look on G E. There's a pretty handy looking golf course nearby.

Yep, there's a bit of tiger country around. If I used the chute I'd be concerned about ending up in a location where it was very difficult for SAR to get to. I'd rather have some control over where I ended up.

While I don't think it was the case in this incident I still stand by my comments about "safety" features like the BRS system on the Cirrus giving many pilots the confidence to go where they might not normally do so. To illustrate my point I can think of some VFR loss of control and CFIT accidents where pilots probably pressed on poor wx on using GPS to navigate by when they wouldn't have done so with out GPS. That doesn't make GPS a bad thing to use, but common sense needs to apply.

I'm not saying a BRS system doesn't have it's very real benefits just that it gives some people a false sense of security. I'd be willing to bet the incident rate is higher in such aircraft.
27/09 is offline  
Old 12th May 2014, 00:08
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: AUS
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not many places to land

"What happened to the forced landing?"

Are people serious? Have you been to the Blue Mountains.
There is practically NOWHERE to do a forced landing.

I think some people's egos over take their brain capacity sometimes.
bogdantheturnipboy is offline  
Old 12th May 2014, 00:09
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: planet earth
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Cirrus is required to have a BRS for certification because there is no other spin recovery. The rest is all propaganda.
desmotronic is offline  
Old 12th May 2014, 00:26
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Knowing my luck I'd pull the Shute and end up landing on high tension power lines or on a railway track.............
nitpicker330 is offline  
Old 12th May 2014, 01:03
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
because there is no other spin recovery
For your average Cirrus owner...

There are plenty of pilots reading this that could arrest a spin in a Cirrus.

However, correct you are, that is why it's there - certification.
VH-XXX is offline  
Old 12th May 2014, 01:06
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Under the Equator
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Desmotronic:
Close, but not quite correct. There is a bit more to it;
When the Cirrus SR20 was first certified, the FAA accepted the wing design (stall inhibitor features) as well as the chute was considered to be an equivalent level of safety with regard to spin recovery.
EASA did not buy into that position and required additional testing from Cirrus which (from memory only - Flying Mag feature?) involved 60 or so spin recovery tests as well as a POH change.
Therefore, the Cirrus did actually comply with spin testing due to EASA demands, however, the POH still requires the chute to be used as the 'official' sole means of spin recovery.
Rich-Fine-Green is offline  
Old 12th May 2014, 01:19
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: somewhere in Oz
Age: 54
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
So, is anyone experimenting with steerable CAPS systems? Surely given the technology in today's jump parachutes and paragliders etc, it would make some sense to use the technology to improve the glide ratio rather than just opting for an uncontrolled, straight-down approach...?
Andy_RR is offline  
Old 12th May 2014, 01:29
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was thinking about this earlier keeping in mind the old fashioned round Army parachutes which I didn't think were steerable.

Then I found this:

How to Steer a Parachute | eHow

Tips & Warnings

Round parachutes are usually not steerable and you have little input on the direction of flight.
--------------

To turn that sized chute I can imagine you would need to pull the "toggles" quite a distance which wouldn't easily be achieved. Hooking it up to the rudder wouldn't give enough throw unless the steering lines were geared.

Interesting question though... I would think it would add complexity that could cause it to all go horribly wrong.
VH-XXX is offline  
Old 12th May 2014, 01:44
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: somewhere in Oz
Age: 54
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If you kept enough forward speed and hung the airframe with a suitable alpha, you could pull the right toggle/cord by manipulating the original airframe control surfaces and changing the attitude of the airframe relative to the chute, perhaps?
Andy_RR is offline  
Old 12th May 2014, 02:21
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Perth - Western Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nitpicker330 - You'd have to be completely out of luck to land exactly on a railway track, the odds would be very low indeed.
Powerlines do pose a bigger threat, because there's a lot more of them than railway tracks.

One of the advantages of HT lines is that the circuit breakers are very swift in operation, and of very low amperage (about 5 amps for a 132kV line).
However, the initial high voltage zap through a human conductor, before the circuit breakers kick in, is where the damage occurs.
The circuit breakers on HT lines are designed to prevent system damage, not save lives, as RCD's are designed to do.

The still-intact aircraft cabin in a parachute landing on HT powerlines, would prevent occupants from being zapped with initial high current levels - unlike a regular forced landing, where the cabin is usually severely damaged, and the occupants can be exposed directly to still-live powerlines.

LT powerlines actually pose a bigger threat in crashes, because it takes a higher level of short-circuitry to make pole fuses burn out.
That's why you must always treat downed LT powerlines as live, until you are certain they have been de-energised.
onetrack is offline  
Old 12th May 2014, 03:28
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I chuckled when I read the AVWEB headline, I thought they were going to say he did it as a demonstration !

Cirrus Salesman Pulls Chute During Demo Flight



Cirrus Salesman Pulls Chute During Demo Flight - AVweb flash Article
VH-XXX is offline  
Old 12th May 2014, 07:11
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: YMMB
Age: 58
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any word on why the engine stopped?

Fuel, mechanical failure?
peterc005 is offline  
Old 12th May 2014, 08:24
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hiding..... in one hemisphere or another
Posts: 1,067
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If I had an engine failure in something with a chute especially over the Blue Mountains, I would not hesitate to deploy it. It's tiger country out there, not very many options for a forced landing so I'm pretty sure they didn't have much choice.
So you would, without any hesitation, just simply pull the ripcord and forget about what mayhem and carnage you might cause from your totally random and uncontrolled impact in a semi-populated area??

Wow....
Atlas Shrugged is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.