P3 Orion ops
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
P3 Orion ops
I noted that during the search efforts for MH370 the P3's shut down their inner engines presumably for loitering.
This got me thinking, what other aircraft types would be operated in this way and how normal is it to shut down multiple engines? I note that when they taxi they shut down their outer engines.
I'm not suggesting they shouldn't, I was just wondering how many aircraft would get away with this, B52 perhaps?
This got me thinking, what other aircraft types would be operated in this way and how normal is it to shut down multiple engines? I note that when they taxi they shut down their outer engines.
I'm not suggesting they shouldn't, I was just wondering how many aircraft would get away with this, B52 perhaps?
Moderator
I remember flying in an Ansett Lockheed L188 Electra (civilian version of the P3 Orion) with the two inboard engines near idle speed. The reason was a design fault, subsequently rectified, but in the interim Electras cruised with the inboard engines at or near idle:
Three aircraft were lost in fatal accidents between February 1959 and March 1960. After the third crash the FAA limited the Electra's speed until the cause could be determined.
After an extensive investigation, two of the crashes (in September 1959 and March 1960) were found to be caused by an engine mount problem. The mounts were not strong enough to damp a phenomenon called "whirl mode flutter" (analogous to the precession of a child's top as it slows down) that affected the outboard engine nacelles. When the oscillation was transmitted to the wings and the flutter frequency decreased to a point where it was harmonic with the outer wing panels, violent up-and-down oscillation increased until the wings would tear themselves off.
After an extensive investigation, two of the crashes (in September 1959 and March 1960) were found to be caused by an engine mount problem. The mounts were not strong enough to damp a phenomenon called "whirl mode flutter" (analogous to the precession of a child's top as it slows down) that affected the outboard engine nacelles. When the oscillation was transmitted to the wings and the flutter frequency decreased to a point where it was harmonic with the outer wing panels, violent up-and-down oscillation increased until the wings would tear themselves off.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You are probably correct, I was only going by a pic taken from the inside of the cabin.
I'm sure with their risk assessments and aircraft operating procedures etc they are confident that there's enough time to get the inner engine spooled up again if the outer engine fails
I'm sure with their risk assessments and aircraft operating procedures etc they are confident that there's enough time to get the inner engine spooled up again if the outer engine fails
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Canterbury, New Zealand
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The mighty Nimrod could also to shut down 2 engines if required, to extend the on task time. #1 Engine on the P3 is the usual choice to shut down in flight, as it does not have a generator, therefore no impact on aircraft/avionics services.
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Age: 39
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Guys,
Are you sure it's an inner engine that is being shutdown? Standard procedure is to shutdown the outer left engine because it's the one without a generator. You can even shutdown both outer engines if you're keen.
As for safety, the requirement is that in the event of a failure you have to be able to restart all your (operable) engines by a given altitude AGL (3000 IIRC). There is therefore a minimum altitude AGL for 3-engine ops and a higher minimum for 2-engine ops.
This is not some dodgy thing invented by gung-ho RAAFies. It's a legit procedure in the aircraft manual.
Are you sure it's an inner engine that is being shutdown? Standard procedure is to shutdown the outer left engine because it's the one without a generator. You can even shutdown both outer engines if you're keen.
As for safety, the requirement is that in the event of a failure you have to be able to restart all your (operable) engines by a given altitude AGL (3000 IIRC). There is therefore a minimum altitude AGL for 3-engine ops and a higher minimum for 2-engine ops.
This is not some dodgy thing invented by gung-ho RAAFies. It's a legit procedure in the aircraft manual.
There would also be a certain time factor built in to allow for them finishing their frozos prior to commencing the restart checklist, which would naturally add to the minimum height requirement! 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Somewhere over Davy Jones's locker
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No1 it is usually, sometimes No 4 to bend the airframe back the other way!
A min height and speed restriction with one loitered is only required when you have a ROD on two engines at heavy weights. Once that ROD due weight is zero, game on and down you go to MOA 100'. Just don't forget to use the rudders when powering up or those frozos will end up on the floor!
A min height and speed restriction with one loitered is only required when you have a ROD on two engines at heavy weights. Once that ROD due weight is zero, game on and down you go to MOA 100'. Just don't forget to use the rudders when powering up or those frozos will end up on the floor!
I noted that during the search efforts for MH370 the P3's shut down their inner engines presumably for loitering
On the footage I spotted they had number 2 shut down.
P3's with their Inner engines shutdown, or just one P3 with number 2 shut down?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It was on a channel 7 news clip and showed a guy looking out the left window with a prop next to him not spinning. No idea on alt, could have been 3,000ft+ easily, lots of water so hard to tell.
The single engine shut down sounds like the most likely scenario.
I note they shut down the outer engines for taxi. Anything to rack up less hours is a good thing I guess!
The single engine shut down sounds like the most likely scenario.
I note they shut down the outer engines for taxi. Anything to rack up less hours is a good thing I guess!
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Try the Age or SMH web sites.
I watched one after the other today after watching one that was in an article,
they came on when the previous one finished.
I'll try and find them.
I watched one after the other today after watching one that was in an article,
they came on when the previous one finished.
I'll try and find them.
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Age: 39
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Have a look at this video starting around the 0:45 mark. You clearly see in the cockpit a lever pulled with a big number 1 on it to the left of 3 more levers with 2, 3 and 4 on them. Yet the view out the left window shows a prop not spinning "right next to him".
It's the outer engine. If it was the inner engine you'd see the outer engine behind it.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Perth - Western Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree with what VH-XXX saw - I saw the same video clip, it was No.2 that was shut down on the RAAF P3.
Both the running outer engine and the stopped engine were clearly visible in the clip. I'm having trouble finding the video clip again.
Both the running outer engine and the stopped engine were clearly visible in the clip. I'm having trouble finding the video clip again.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just saw a clip on Sunrise taken from behind the left wing and engine 1 was shut down. Interesting ! The other clip of engine 2 was in front of the wing.
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi guys,
Of course, thats a video of an American P3 flying over what looks like Saudi or Kuwait.
We need to be clear about a few things here with RAAF P3 operations:
1/ only engines 1 and/or 4 are ever shut down for loiter operations, which is what we are discussing here. That prop you see out the Tacco's window is engine 1.
2/ with both 1 & 4 shut down, the minimum intentional flight altitude will be 1,000 feet. The Flight Engineer would calculate the airplane performance on one engine prior to loitering on two.
3/ the video is USN, they do things sometimes differently, and in the case shown, shutting down engine 1 with the Emergency Shutdown Handle (that big black and yellow handle) is for just that, emergency shutdowns, not loiter shutdowns. Loiter shutdowns are controlled with the Feather Buttons, located overhead the Flight Engineer, slightly to his left. These buttons are used both for shutting down the engine for loiter, and restarting (unfeathering) it when required.
4/ The inboard engines are never intentionally loiter shutdown, since they both drive an active generator and one each of the air conditioning (and pressurization) compressors. Though engine 4 does have a generator, unlike engine 1, this is the third, standby generator that will cut in if there is a failure of one of the other two.
5/ For me , the complication here is that, although engine 1 does not have a generator, it is the critical engine and therefore causes some rudder and trim work for the flying pilot each time big power changes are introduced. So, with that in mind, my technique was to always loiter engine 4, which made the airplane much easier to handle during big power changes. If the generator was subsequently needed, we simply restarted engine 4 and loitered engine 1, but that was very rare.
6/ You may notice that the loitered prop is always seen in the 'X' configuration, with none of the prop blades horizontal. That is intentional, and handled by the Flight Engineer to limit the amount of turbulence off the blades affecting the closely following wing, for better ride quality.
In an emergency restart, the Flight Engineer can have the loitered engine at full power within around 20-25 seconds, I've been there!
Normally, when the intention is to fly below 100 feet, all four is good, but that will not apply to these missions! (continuous RAWS is annoying!)
I'm seeing these video shots as you are, and I'm surprised both 1 and 4 are not loitered for most of the search phase of the mission.
Top airplane . . .
Of course, thats a video of an American P3 flying over what looks like Saudi or Kuwait.
We need to be clear about a few things here with RAAF P3 operations:
1/ only engines 1 and/or 4 are ever shut down for loiter operations, which is what we are discussing here. That prop you see out the Tacco's window is engine 1.
2/ with both 1 & 4 shut down, the minimum intentional flight altitude will be 1,000 feet. The Flight Engineer would calculate the airplane performance on one engine prior to loitering on two.
3/ the video is USN, they do things sometimes differently, and in the case shown, shutting down engine 1 with the Emergency Shutdown Handle (that big black and yellow handle) is for just that, emergency shutdowns, not loiter shutdowns. Loiter shutdowns are controlled with the Feather Buttons, located overhead the Flight Engineer, slightly to his left. These buttons are used both for shutting down the engine for loiter, and restarting (unfeathering) it when required.
4/ The inboard engines are never intentionally loiter shutdown, since they both drive an active generator and one each of the air conditioning (and pressurization) compressors. Though engine 4 does have a generator, unlike engine 1, this is the third, standby generator that will cut in if there is a failure of one of the other two.
5/ For me , the complication here is that, although engine 1 does not have a generator, it is the critical engine and therefore causes some rudder and trim work for the flying pilot each time big power changes are introduced. So, with that in mind, my technique was to always loiter engine 4, which made the airplane much easier to handle during big power changes. If the generator was subsequently needed, we simply restarted engine 4 and loitered engine 1, but that was very rare.
6/ You may notice that the loitered prop is always seen in the 'X' configuration, with none of the prop blades horizontal. That is intentional, and handled by the Flight Engineer to limit the amount of turbulence off the blades affecting the closely following wing, for better ride quality.
In an emergency restart, the Flight Engineer can have the loitered engine at full power within around 20-25 seconds, I've been there!
Normally, when the intention is to fly below 100 feet, all four is good, but that will not apply to these missions! (continuous RAWS is annoying!)
I'm seeing these video shots as you are, and I'm surprised both 1 and 4 are not loitered for most of the search phase of the mission.
Top airplane . . .
Moderator
That is intentional, and handled by the Flight Engineer to limit the amount of turbulence off the blades affecting the closely following wing, for better ride quality.
Seeing there were some comments earlier re the L188, it was a little different in that the props - quite slowly - rotate when feathered (too long ago to recall the reason) .. felt like going over a road speed hump .. at speed .. each time a blade crossed the LE .. those were wonderful days ...
Seeing there were some comments earlier re the L188, it was a little different in that the props - quite slowly - rotate when feathered (too long ago to recall the reason) .. felt like going over a road speed hump .. at speed .. each time a blade crossed the LE .. those were wonderful days ...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just looked at the video above and it's clearly the outer engine shut down. The constant clips via Channel 7 literally show a prop right next to the guys head looking out the window, clearly number 2, not spinning. Very interesting.
Maybe they had an engine failure !
PS: By starting this thread it was not meant to suggest anything dodgey has been happening; it was simply a discussion on the operations of the P3.
Maybe they had an engine failure !
PS: By starting this thread it was not meant to suggest anything dodgey has been happening; it was simply a discussion on the operations of the P3.
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alderaan
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My late dad used to fly on the malaysian PC130H. And recall him telling me that they used to shut one engine down. And they would be up there on SAR for up to 14 hours.
Posted from Pprune.org App for Android
Posted from Pprune.org App for Android