Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

New Air Traffic Control System – Secrecy?

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

New Air Traffic Control System – Secrecy?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Aug 2013, 12:22
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: YMML
Posts: 1,845
Received 21 Likes on 11 Posts
Pavement, the only hardware upgrade of particular significance was to the computers (servers and workstations) and that was how many years ago? There will be no more as Alpha processors are long gone. That is one big reason we need something new.
le Pingouin is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2013, 12:47
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes the Alpha chip has been gone since 2007 (effectively some years before that) but that does not limit you to a full blown system replacement.

Any ATC wants the best and greatest system. It may also be the case that everything is about to fall apart - Im not privy to the ins and outs of both systems. What Im asking is what will be delivered for a not insubstantial amount of money.

I could be wrong and there may be real benefits. Throw the business case out there.

Do I care? Not really as I'll be soaking up my pension by 2020.
Pavement is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2013, 21:31
  #23 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,604
Likes: 0
Received 74 Likes on 29 Posts
With the $1.2 Billion written of by the Canberra bureaucracy on the Super Seasprite tender I hope this will be different.

I notice no one was ever held accountable for that.

What happened to those people- were they all promoted?
Dick Smith is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2013, 10:27
  #24 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,604
Likes: 0
Received 74 Likes on 29 Posts
Shouldn't we just go to one system. That is get the military to run it all. That's got to save money for the industry - as the RAAF don't charge ASA or the industry at the present time- just continue with that!
Dick Smith is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2013, 11:07
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Downunda
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face

C'mon Dick, of course those people were promoted or at the very least moved to another department on equal pay. Again I say that you of all people should know how the system works, you worked for CASA mate, c'mon don't be shy, don't feign innocence
And Dick, don't forget the other billion dollar white elephants that came in with a bang and great fanfare, the billion dollar pink bats scheme, billion dollar BER folly, then you have $5 billion handed to the IMF to help bail out Greece - the land where tax avoidance is a national pass time, multi billion dollar Collins submarines fiasco, and of course a modest $200 million in chump change spent on failed regulatory reform, close to a billion spent on ASA infrastructure and then the CEO jumps ship to the very company they got the majority of that tender, and the endless list continues etc etc etc.....
004wercras is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2013, 11:44
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SA
Age: 63
Posts: 2,634
Received 144 Likes on 106 Posts
Dick, why don't you put together a consortium to bid on the system.
sunnySA is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2013, 11:51
  #27 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,604
Likes: 0
Received 74 Likes on 29 Posts
No way. But who does TFN work for now? What contract did they do?
Dick Smith is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2013, 14:30
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: YMML
Posts: 1,845
Received 21 Likes on 11 Posts
The Metron CDM tool: CDM Stage 1 ? ATFM | Airservices

Metron: Metron Aviation - Metron Aviation Appoints Greg Russell as Executive Aviation Advisor

Departed ASA May 2012, appointment to Metron August 1012......
le Pingouin is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2013, 00:20
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SA
Age: 63
Posts: 2,634
Received 144 Likes on 106 Posts
Dick, why don't you put together a consortium to bid on the system.
No way.
But Dick, if you truly interested in aviation and safety then you'd put together a 'not for profit' consortium to deliver the best ATC system, what a great legacy to leave...
sunnySA is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2013, 13:57
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: London
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It may be long forgotten but when ASA went for TAATS the military for some unknown reason picked a different system.
4Greens is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2013, 22:53
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oz
Age: 49
Posts: 74
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
4 Greens - from what I understand the RAAF's requirement for 11 remote towers and 9 TCUs was all too much for the builders of TAAATS at that time. Apparently they didn't bid as they were having enough trouble with Airservices' remote locations.

SC.
Showa Cho is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2013, 14:28
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: London
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Showa Cho thanks for that info. That is when the Gumnut should have banged some heads together.
4Greens is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.