Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Same Old Same Old - How do we change it??

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Same Old Same Old - How do we change it??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Mar 2013, 06:53
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Same Old Same Old - How do we change it??

Folks,
All of the above is well worth a read, particularly given the last few months here in Oz.
Tootle pip!!
LeadSled is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2013, 07:59
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: rangaville
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
* Make an APS course mandatory.
* Go back to RPPL & PPL.
* Make spin training mandatory.
* Encourage aerobatic training as part of PPL syllabus.
* Come to grips with GPS, you can't fool the young whippersnappers, the training industry has got to come to grips with it yet still give the whippersnappers a good working knowledge of DR.
* Address the appalling average age of the GA fleet. For a first world country it's a disgrace that this infrastructure is in the state it's in.
* Scrap CASA & ATSB, start again. Get rid of the OLC & make the promotion of aviation part of both their charter.

That's how
Jack Ranga is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2013, 08:21
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yup Jack pretty much on the money. If the industry is to survive it has to get out from under the regulatory load. Its two thirds cheaper to operate the same aircraft in the US, and their regulator is looking for further ways to reduce costs to the industry by making it cheaper to certify aircraft and other initiatives to make it cheaper to own and operate a certified aircraft. All our lot can do is write ever more burdensome claptrap that serves no useful purpose but to drive up costs. Same thing happened in the UK, a hell of a lot of private aircraft there now operate on foreign registers.
thorn bird is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2013, 08:56
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Infinity and beyond
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What Jack said!!!
buzzz.lightyear is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2013, 11:28
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: in the country
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here, here Jack!
in-cog-nito is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2013, 12:12
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 50
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I reckon we all chip in and buy Jack a 1 way ticket to Canberra, whether he wants it or not.

And then take over from the Julia wench.

Jack for PM
Unregistered User is online now  
Old 27th Mar 2013, 14:14
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Jack,
For once I agree with most of what you have said, with the exception of the matter of fleet age.
We have absolutely no record of accidents to show that fleet age, or structural adequacy is an issue.
Tootle pip!!
LeadSled is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2013, 17:35
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Under the Equator
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dr:

I'm sorry to advise it's a bit worse than that...

165 Billion is JUST for Gillard's term since her little coup d'état.

NET Labor Debt is approaching the 300 Billion limit set by Parliment.

Swanny may need to lift that limit this budget.

Nice moves considering Johnny and Pete left Labor a nice little surplus in '07....
Rich-Fine-Green is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2013, 19:05
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Queensland
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aust debt 10% GDP
US & Europe 80% GDP
Average rest 50% GDP
So RICH fine green your problem is ?????????
rutan around is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2013, 19:40
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: FG central
Age: 53
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I love Labor parrots.
So, you REALLY want Australia to be facing the problems the US and Greece/some of the EU are facing? I'd rather not have to deal with that sort of incompetence.
Typhoon650 is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2013, 20:10
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Queensland
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I love Labor parrots------ The pot calling the kettle black I think. Whats best - spend some money to maintain employment and end up with an economy that's the envy of the world or do a Newman- sack thousands , employ a bunch of dodgy mates and watch the economy plummet.
Back on thread. I fully agree with LeadSled. There is no evidence that age is a problem with properly maintained aircraft. In my opinion some of the older machines are slowly being replaced with less efficient and less useful ones.eg the Cessna 210-Can anything beat it on a balanced basket of abilities?
rutan around is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2013, 20:59
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: rangaville
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lead, regarding fleet age, it's more the avionics, the cost of upgrading etc.

I forgot to add to the CASA & ATSB bizzo. Remove, NOW, the political appointments & put aviation people in there. The ATSB was a disgrace during the Pelair ditching, an embarrassment clearly out of his depth.

I can't go to Canberra yet, got a bit of stuff on
Jack Ranga is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2013, 21:39
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,693
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So, as I understand it, Jack is pretty much describing how things were in the seventies (except for the GPS bit).

In my experience, the install cost of avioincs in Australia is about twice that of the US. Part of the reason is that not as many guys here have repeat experience with the same equipment / aircraft configurations. But big part of the reason is that CASA just make it more expensive with a raft of red tape that doesn't exist elsewhere. There is also a shortage of Avioins LAME's so the sector is not very competitive. All issues in the domain of CASA if they had any real interest in promoting safety.

BTW, I think 3 more NDB's were decommissioned this week and YWE is still not working. ASA is simply not doing its job in providing a properly maintained air navigation infrastructure.

Agree with Leadsled. There is an issue of maintenance integrity with some aircraft, but no airframe age issue per se. The vast majority of our private fleet has only done a fraction of its design hours.
Old Akro is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2013, 23:27
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
* Make an APS course mandatory.
* Go back to RPPL & PPL.
* Make spin training mandatory.
* Encourage aerobatic training as part of PPL syllabus.
* Come to grips with GPS, you can't fool the young whippersnappers, the training industry has got to come to grips with it yet still give the whippersnappers a good working knowledge of DR.
* Address the appalling average age of the GA fleet. For a first world country it's a disgrace that this infrastructure is in the state it's in.
* Scrap CASA & ATSB, start again. Get rid of the OLC & make the promotion of aviation part of both their charter.

That's how
Item one would do a heck of a lot to help. Many dead pilots and passengers would be alive today had they done this. And it would have saved them a fortune in maintenance costs, etc.

The rest of that list is of equal value. POTY Jack.
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2013, 01:41
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sydney NSW Australia
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aust debt 10% GDP
US & Europe 80% GDP
Average rest 50% GDP
why are we comapring ourselves to the worst, and telling ourselves all is good, compare us to the best, we are no longer so good. with our mineral wealth, we should be one of the best, not the best of the worst.
Ultralights is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2013, 01:43
  #16 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
---- the install cost of avioincs in Australia is about twice that of the US
Folks,
True in spades, but the reasons are wider and deeper, CASA "regulations" is driving up costs, as have many other present government's regulatory activities.

For something like a Kingair, it is substantially cheaper to ferry the aircraft back to US for any but minor upgrades. If you are putting in a full Garmin or Aspen system, or something similar, it is "no contest". Likewise, Singapore produces net costs far better than here.

If you are putting something like a Garmin 600 in your light twin, it is cheaper to buy all the bits, have the panel mod. made in the US and fly a techo. down here to fit it, than have it done locally. And the turnaround time will be measured in days, not months.

Taking a light single/twin to NZ to do major avionics upgrades is also very viable, compared to doing it here.

Tootle pip!!
LeadSled is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2013, 02:22
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 74
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If you are putting something like a Garmin 600 in your light twin, it is cheaper to buy all the bits, have the panel mod. made in the US and fly a techo. down here to fit it, than have it done locally. And the turnaround time will be measured in days, not months.
What a load of bollocks, each install job is an individual and depends on the start and finish points. The cost of the equipment here in Oz is still cheaper than flying to the US.
Arnold E is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2013, 02:41
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Agreed with Arnold, and Jack Ranga's recent experience shows the Aussies are competitive. So were mine.

Some shops are slick....others not so.

Complete Avionics on the Gold Coast
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2013, 02:49
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Dark side of the moon
Age: 61
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arnold E, that was my thoughts, Avionics Shop at $130 an hour, sheet metal work at $95 an hour. Components are at what they cost.

Last edited by owen meaney; 28th Mar 2013 at 02:50.
owen meaney is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2013, 03:18
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 74
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Avionics Shop at $130 an hour,
Bloody hell, better tell the boss to put the rate up.
Arnold E is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.