Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Is the "Heavy" Piston Twin dead

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Jan 2023, 01:41
  #121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 552
Received 81 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by 43Inches
The only way an AVGAS replacement will be cheaper than AVTUR is if there is some huge change in the way it is refined, dropping lead is a start, but that might make refining a longer more expensive process making in more expensive again.
It's not the refining cost, it's the testing & paperwork cost - after all this is aviation we're talking about here. Car fuel is, let's just say, a little less stringent.

By definition, AVGAS* without TEL isn't AVGAS, hence the significant cost-and-time hassles GAMI had to go through to generate STCs for every engine type their customers want to run their G100UL (G = GAMI) on - even through it's (supposedly) a drop-in replacement. That means that, at airports in the states where only G100UL is available, if you haven't obtained (paid for) an STC in advance you can't, legally, refuel your aircraft there.


*For standard AVGAS, start at ASTM D910-21 Standard Specification for Leaded Aviation Gasolines
The gasoline shall adhere to octane rating requirements specified for individual grades, as follows: lean mixture knock value (motor octane number and aviation lean rating); rich mixture knock value (octane and performance number); tetraethyl lead content; color; and dye content (blue, yellow, red, and orange). Conversely, the gasoline shall meet the following requirements specified for all grades: density; distillation (initial and final boiling points, fuel evaporated, evaporated temperatures); recovery, residue, and loss volume; vapor pressure; freezing point; sulfur content; net heat of combustion; copper strip corrosion; oxidation stability (potential gum and lead precipitate); volume change during water reaction; and electrical conductivity.

Last edited by PiperCameron; 31st Jan 2023 at 01:55. Reason: Added ASTM reference
PiperCameron is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2023, 02:49
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Australia/India
Posts: 5,287
Received 419 Likes on 209 Posts
Originally Posted by PiperCameron
Though it isn't likely to be 'banned' over here because (a) the 'Big 4' oil companies (one in particular) kinda enjoy the monopoly they have right now and (b) GA industry in this country is too small for anyone in power to notice (or care) that we're still using it! Aviation White Paper, anyone??

They're not that noble.. GAMI were prompted to pursue its own alternative because they saw an opportunity (if it worked) to make some serious money.

If Innospec USA stop making TEL for whatever reason then, yeah, GAMI can just wander in and take over whenever they like. So it's politics, not technology or cost or anything else that's the real issue (in the USA as well as here).
I often read your posts as actually making my point.

I agree, it's politics that will determine whether LL Avgas will continue to be available in Australia (and the USA). There are plenty of environmentalists in Australia who have the ear of people who have a big and occasionally decisive chunk of votes in various parliaments around the place. It is precisely because the "GA industry" in Australia is so small that it easy to sacrifice without causing too much political damage. And LL Avgas is rounding errors on the oil companies' petty cash float.

I didn't suggest GAMI were in it as a charity. George Braly is a very, very smart man and I hope he gets very, very rich off G1000UL. That's as it should be in capitalist countries.
Lead Balloon is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2023, 03:10
  #123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 552
Received 81 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by Lead Balloon
I often read your posts as actually making my point.
Just passing out a bit more ammo.. so I'll take that as a compliment, LB

Originally Posted by Lead Balloon
I didn't suggest GAMI were in it as a charity. George Braly is a very, very smart man and I hope he gets very, very rich off G1000UL. That's as it should be in capitalist countries.
Given he's been working on it for over a decade knowing that at no time was it a guaranteed success.. and then actually succeeding in getting the FAA to approve STCs for nearly every GA aircraft still flying?!? Wow! Yes, indeed!
PiperCameron is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2023, 03:20
  #124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: tossbagville
Posts: 795
Received 176 Likes on 102 Posts
Working on it for 10 years, and probably 9 years of that was burecratic bull****.
tossbag is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2023, 03:24
  #125 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,789
Received 415 Likes on 229 Posts
AVGAS refinement is really not that more controlled than car fuel. Different dye, TEL additive, tested at regular stages. However the big difference is its a limited run specialty fuel. So it's more expensive. High perfromance car users used to sneak some from aircraft bowsers as there was less tax making it cheaper than specialty racing fuels that were more expensive for the same reason. There used to be enough demand for several refineries in Australia, now only the one refinery provides AVGAS. Funny for ages they still had green and blue fuel, which were both the same product with different dyes for retail purposes, the green dye fuel having stuffed up in 2001 which created problems for brass parts in fuel lines and carbys. They conned a lot that the green fuel was still 100/130, but was just BP/Mobils version of 100LL. It was even worse when it was coming from the same refinery in different colours.
43Inches is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2023, 08:06
  #126 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 97
Received 17 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Corvallis
Tecnam p2012 is a heavy piston twin . Selling quite well.
Is it selling quite well though? Don't think the Australian distributor has booked any sales yet, and I know of two operators that had a look at the P2012 and promptly bought a Caravan EX instead.
evilducky is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2023, 08:58
  #127 (permalink)  
Man Bilong Balus long PNG
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Looking forward to returning to Japan soon but in the meantime continuing the never ending search for a bad bottle of Red!
Age: 69
Posts: 2,969
Received 96 Likes on 55 Posts
Slight Thread drift

High perfromance car users used to sneak some from aircraft bowsers as there was less tax making it cheaper than specialty racing fuels that were more expensive for the same reason.
I used to drive a 1974 Toyota Celica which had a worked Twin Cam Engine. (Almost Full Race specs) Back in the late 90's Avgas 100LL was cheaper than Unleaded Fuel and the engine pinged like hell on straight Unleaded, so ran the Car solely on 100LL. Car performed very well!!

Then had to switch to Premium Unleaded (98 RON) when I could no longer source the Avgas and didn't really notice any decrease in performance.
Pinky the pilot is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2023, 20:15
  #128 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: yyz
Posts: 100
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Horatio Leafblower
...What problems are they?

If you have professional and competent engineers and pilots the Titan is an awesome aircraft and the GTSIO is an awesome engine. As said above, it ****s all over the competition
I was training captain at a survey company. Engine management was my number one priority, you wouldn't believe how many(experienced)guys would pull the engine to idle for.a.descent. Needless to say beating s improved morale(mine anyways)
rigpiggy is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2023, 02:28
  #129 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Location: Australia
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
This one is an interesting time capsule.

quote from RatsoreA December 2012 "and 35 404's on the register and 33 Caravans. "

Now there are still 33 titans but the Caravan population is 146 !
Aerodynamicer is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2023, 10:54
  #130 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Equatorial
Age: 51
Posts: 1,068
Received 125 Likes on 62 Posts
Originally Posted by Aerodynamicer
This one is an interesting time capsule.

quote from RatsoreA December 2012 "and 35 404's on the register and 33 Caravans. "

Now there are still 33 titans but the Caravan population is 146 !
If they were still building Titans then it would be a better comparison!

Is the F406 still being built? Now that was a beast, basically a PT6 Titan.

The big turbine singles certainly gaining popularity but as the thread is twins with less new options out there what really is the choice?
Global Aviator is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.