Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Tail Wheel Endo!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Aug 2012, 01:42
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: South Melbourne
Age: 77
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

I was trying to avoid getting involved in this thread, but???
I am really not sure why an endorsement is really neccesary. As mentioned by others, up until the late 1950's nearly everyone learnt on taildragers and thought nothing of it, when the early Cessnas and Pipers stuck on a nosewheel it did make things a little easier (too easy) but had the effect of producing less compeptent Pilots. Now to get T/W endo all you have to learn are few different techniques such as;
  • The Rudder pedals are not footrests
  • How to make a proper balanced turn
  • The correct approach speed
  • How to hold off and flare correctly
I did a bit of my Training on Chippies and Tigers and later on owned a Tiger, Super Cub but mostly many hours on a Cessna 170A.

I was trained well and as such never had a ground loop in over 2000 of T/W time.

so all those that are a bit tententive about learning to fly a "proper Aeroplane" my advice is go to it, the best money you will ever spend.
Now where did I leave my Pipe and Slippers?
Cheers
Old but not bold is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2012, 06:11
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollister, Hilo, Pago Pago, Norfolk Is., Brisbane, depending which day of the week it is...
Age: 51
Posts: 1,352
Received 31 Likes on 9 Posts
I am really not sure why an endorsement is really neccesary.

...a nosewheel it did make things a little easier (too easy) but had the effect of producing less compeptent Pilots. Now to get T/W endo all you have to learn are few different techniques such as;

The Rudder pedals are not footrests
How to make a proper balanced turn
The correct approach speed
How to hold off and flare correctly
And there you go....

Mind you, I am in full agreement that tailwheel trained pilots know how to use rudders. I am the first to admit, as a nosewheel trained student, I was woefully lacking in this area.

Everyone should have some time on a conventional u/c airframe
MakeItHappenCaptain is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2012, 14:34
  #43 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: sydney, australia
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Hey all,

thanks for all the replies/info/tips/etc...

I guess main reason i started this was to just put the thought of flying in a tailwheel out there to any folk who has just been down the standard flight training route.. glad its getting some views and feedback!

am keen to try my hand at some new tailwheel types in the near future, if anyone has some recommendations that would be great, keen to try other types then the citabria now...sydney basin or there abouts, send us a PM..cheers guys and safe flying..
propelled is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2012, 14:37
  #44 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: sydney, australia
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
oh yeah, and i wanna really nail the wheel landing, so if any old hands (experience i mean) who are keen to show me how, let me know! cheers
propelled is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2012, 21:30
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: South Melbourne
Age: 77
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wheelies are manditory for some tailwheel types and also helpful in crosswinds for others, best to get it on the ground and under control. In Tailwheel crosswind landings, holding off for a 3 pointer could see you drifting off the runway then having to use rudder to get back on the runway setting up a groundloop?
Wheel technique roughly is flare but do not hold off, let the mains touch and as soon as you hear the squeal push forward on the stick to keep the tail up (nail it) if you don't keep level as soon as you touch down the Tail will drop resulting in a nose up attitude and small lift off with no airspeed and then back down in what then becomes a series of bounces that increase in size "hopity hop down the runway".
A good Instuctor will demonstrate and teach both landing techniques until you are totally competent. You will then have the most important tools to fly a real aeroplane
Old but not bold is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2012, 06:41
  #46 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: sydney, australia
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Old not bold... doing a few more laps of the circuit will help me im sure..
propelled is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 18:36
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Poole, Dorset
Age: 49
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I fully recommend the tail wheel flying, the cons you mentioned aren't really cons, you can ground loop it but why would you do anything to result in a ground loop, just keep the feet active...

Less likely to prop strike on a rough field too. I was converted and sought a tail wheel (Kitfox), I love it and will never look back.

Steve.
svenski59 is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2013, 11:26
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Australia
Age: 45
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I concur. A great thing to do. I got signed off this morning in a Super Decathlon.
Like you propeller, still have a bit of work to do on the wheelers.
Lots of fun, pretty challenging but very rewarding to nail a 3 pointer on the markers.
Flanker978 is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2013, 00:59
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Aus, or USA, or UK or EU, or possibly somehwere in Asia.
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I must say that I am but surprised that you chasps have been 'signed off' with a tailwheel endo without 'mastering' the wheeler.

I would have thought that it would be a prerequisite to demonstrate, to a satisfactory standard, all types of landings (and take offs as well) including the wheeler and max demonstrated X winds, wing down and kick straight wheelers and 3 pointers to get a tick.

The champion products are very simple to fly, and when I do endos I always get the student into another type, (preferable a wuneighty) and run around the block a few times to see if the principles are imbedded. Then a load check to max aft in the 180, an old one without the small dorsal, in a cross wind to top it all off. If they can do all that and I would trust them with my family on board, I will sign them off. otherwise, they do more decathlon time before we try again.

I agree that it is a very good skills enhancement for those trained on milk stools, as all the harping about keeping straight and use of rudder during ab initio is generally disregarded by pilots who have convinced themselves that all that sh!t is not important. Doing a TW endo brings into sharp focus exactly WHY the instructor has been carrying on about it all the time.

Someone trained on a docile tailwheeler adapts quicker to a sensitive one, than someone who has gone the nosewheel route as the basic yaw control skills are default settings, unlike the tricycle pilot, to whom the rudder pedals may just as well be painted on the firewall for all they care.

What's special about Austers....absolutely nothing (say it again, yeah!)

My vote for nicest tailwheel aircraft to fly - Chippy of course! Also a very good trainer, even though docile , you really do need to use the rudders for ALL stages of the flight as even subtle changes in speed and power are quite noticeable, and your feet will need to be used with every nuance to keep it all nicely balanced.

No, make that the nicest to fly, regardless of where the wheels are. I recommend it to all those who are new to tailwheel aircraft, find one and do some time in it, you will not regret a minute or a dollar you have spent.

If i was Margaret Pomerantz I would give it 4 and a half stars.

HD
-
HarleyD is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2013, 01:14
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Australia
Age: 45
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I must say that I am but surprised that you chasps have been 'signed off' with a
tailwheel endo without 'mastering' the wheeler.
Lets say we need more work to 'perfect' the wheeler.
Flanker978 is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2013, 01:21
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Harley
That sounds like good advice.
PM sent.
John
rjtjrt is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2013, 00:02
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Next door to the wrong neighbours
Posts: 243
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
11th Nov 2013 12:49 Dr Oakenfold -
Any recommendations on who to see for the endorsement based in Sydney?
A friend bought a Maule and then went to Curtis Aviation at Camden to complete his license. Did it in quick-time too so I figure they were ok.
truthinbeer is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2013, 02:22
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Up The 116E, Stbd Turn at 32S...:-)
Age: 82
Posts: 3,096
Received 45 Likes on 20 Posts
Re 'my vote for nicest tail wheel aircraft to fly'......
I do believe that A.C.F.T. at JT have a Chippy avbl for training and hire....
And, at a 'reasonable' rate....

Cheers
Ex FSO GRIFFO is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2013, 11:20
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney
Age: 62
Posts: 458
Received 21 Likes on 6 Posts
Tail Wheel Endo!

Hazair in Albury also have a nice Chippy available for private hire and a G model T6 Harvard for dual instruction.
roundsounds is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2013, 19:42
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Super Cecil: Frank, I found it best just to land an Auster without worrying about all that other stuff

If you really have landed an Auster as PIC, and have done so in a range of conditions, you will know that they take more than the usual degree of attention to avoid the landing becoming an event.

Bungee suspension, high wing with a span of 36', low wing loading, light basic weight and little braking from the heel-activated cable operated mechanical brakes combine to make it a bit of a challenge in a cross-wind. It was designed when airfields were all over and it's ability to bounce and swing is legendary. They keep you honest!

Mine has an 0-320 in it and its a sweet little aeroplane to fly.

Kaz
kaz3g is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2013, 01:51
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,165
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
My experience has been that people who learn both three-pointers and wheelers for their tail-wheel endorsement on a Decathlon (students of present company excepted) fail to master the wheeler or confuse the two techniques resulting in their passenger (me) getting very scared for safety of the aeroplane and occupants.
Some schools only teach three-pointers on the Decathlon (I have some old handling notes which have been around Moorabbin for many years stating that wheelers should not be done). After some solo experience it doesn't take long to get some dual and really master wheelers.
Of course, some-one doing the endorsement then moving onto another type definitely must do wheelers.
Otherwise, my opinion of Decathlon tail-wheel training is that if the individual is sticking with that type for the immediate future then the best plan is to master the three-pointer, get some experience on it then come back and master the wheeler. The aeroplane can easily handle crosswinds to the max recommended etc with the three-point technique.

Regardless, the new draft Part 61 MOS which may be dropped on us before 4th December gives us the required performance criteria to apply in future. For example:
Lands aeroplane in the following profiles:
o main wheels and tail wheel simultaneously (three-point landing)
o wheel landing (main wheels only on touchdown)
o flapless landing
....
Crosswind, headwind or tailwind to the limits of the aircraft type.
 Sealed, gravel or grass runways.
Short landing.
 Calculates landing performance in accordance with performance chart.
 Stops aeroplane within calculated landing distance.
Good luck with that!
djpil is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2013, 04:04
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you really have landed an Auster as PIC, and have done so in a range of conditions, you will know that they take more than the usual degree of attention to avoid the landing becoming an event.
The answer is yes. I have flown a couple of other tailwheel aircraft as well
Tailwheel flying is considered a black art by some and that you have to be "Special" to do it, while my mum thought I was "Special" no body else does. If a chump like myself can do it anybody can. It's a learned skill like any other, those that fly them are the same as anybody else.
Super Cecil is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2013, 09:49
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sharpie only taught 3 pointers in BIK when I did my endorsement in 1984 at Coldstream.

Nic Cauldwell taught me to do wheelers in an Auster at Tyabb when I did a couple of hours with him before buying BYM but he felt they were not as safe an option as conventional landings due to the inherent bounce and things unravelling quickly.

I generally 3 point BYM whereas I would always wheel a C170.

Kaz
kaz3g is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.