Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

NVFR Recency requirements

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Dec 2011, 04:00
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: -28.1494 / 151.943
Age: 68
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NVFR Recency requirements

Yeh I know I should be able to find it myself, but seek guidance from the AIP guru's regarding recency for carrying pax on local night flights in our 206 all input appreciated, happy new year all.....
Avgas172 is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2011, 04:28
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 147
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Look in the CAO's dude.
triathlon is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2011, 05:17
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Outback Australia
Posts: 397
Received 17 Likes on 8 Posts
I agree - CAOs should be your first port of call.

And if you're going to be charging a fare for night VFR in a SE aircraft, I wait with interest to hear the outcome of the prosecution.
outnabout is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2011, 06:32
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The reference is CAO 40.2.2.5

To fly under NVFR, 1 hr at night within the previous year and within the previous 6 months carried out at least 1 take off and landing at night.

To fly with pax, you also need to have the 3 night t/o and landings within 90 days.

Can't seem to find the reference (thought it was in the cao 20-series but it remains elusive for the moment) but as I recall PVT and AWK flights by night are fine, but passenger carrying charter is out in singles.
Ozzie Mozzie is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2011, 10:08
  #5 (permalink)  
Sprucegoose
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Always thought part of holding a rating was knowing the 'privileges and limitations' of the rating, or am I just old school?
Howard Hughes is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2011, 12:46
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollister, Hilo, Pago Pago, Norfolk Is., Brisbane, depending which day of the week it is...
Age: 51
Posts: 1,352
Received 31 Likes on 9 Posts
Ozzie.
CAO 40.2.1 Para 14
Flights under NVFR procedures.

The essence of this is that the NVFR rating is only able to be used for PVT and AWK operations.

HH.
Agreed. Should be revised with an AFR theory component at least, maybe a couple of questions as part of an IFR renewal by the ATO for others?
MakeItHappenCaptain is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2011, 19:52
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: -28.1494 / 151.943
Age: 68
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the reference to the CAO's, as I said I could have looked it up but was just too lazy after Christmas.
And if you're going to be charging a fare for night VFR in a SE aircraft, I wait with interest to hear the outcome of the prosecution.
Thats what I like about Pprune ... there is always some d#*head willing to push the CASA guilty and prove yourself innocent line here .... where in the post did anyone mention charging for the flights get a life dude! .... not everyone in the world wants to be a lowly paid sky god on half of what a cleaner gets in the mines, some of us actually love ..... flying.
Avgas172 is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2011, 19:58
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: -28.1494 / 151.943
Age: 68
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Always thought part of holding a rating was knowing the 'privileges and limitations' of the rating, or am I just old school?
HH old bean, actually it's just knowing where to find the reference to the 'privileges and limitations' of the rating, and in this case I chose the much greater knowledge base of the Pprune Guru's to assist me in doing so.
cheers
A172
Avgas172 is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2011, 22:53
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: East
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats what I like about Pprune ... there is always some d#*head willing to push the CASA guilty and prove yourself innocent line here .... where in the post did anyone mention charging for the flights get a life dude! .... not everyone in the world wants to be a lowly paid sky god on half of what a cleaner gets in the mines, some of us actually love ..... flying.
You did say 'all input appreciated' and that's what you got.
Surely you expected a response like that when you decided typing 'CAO night VFR' into google was too difficult
NIK320 is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2011, 23:54
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: -28.1494 / 151.943
Age: 68
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not all of us are google freaks mate, and don't call me Shirley.
Avgas172 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.