Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

PH + Fog = OMG

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th May 2011, 14:39
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oztrailea
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PH + Fog = OMG

Wow. How much fun was PH this morning.

Fogged in, incredibly restrictive movement rate and departure slot bingo!

Kal must have thought they were under attack. What a day...
flightfocus is offline  
Old 17th May 2011, 15:52
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: A house
Posts: 645
Received 9 Likes on 3 Posts
It was still 'fun' at 2300 this evening!

Looks like a carbon copy tomorrow morning.
Chadzat is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 01:25
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would be a non event in a 1st world country.
Mr. Hat is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 01:57
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,551
Received 73 Likes on 42 Posts
Looks like a carbon copy tomorrow morning.
Cut ya whinging! Beautiful sunny day today. Don't you know the forecasters simply forecast what happened yesterday? That way they are always 75% right!
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 02:15
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Enroute from Dagobah to Tatooine...!
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That wasn't you in Meektharra was it Bloggsie...?!
Captain Nomad is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 06:08
  #6 (permalink)  
beaver_rotate
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yup third world alright!!

I want to know where WagonAir (Air Asia X) went yesterday??

Also Thai were quizzed over and over again on their fuel state, was like pulling teeth apparently, not sure what the big secret was ... interesting
 
Old 18th May 2011, 08:42
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,551
Received 73 Likes on 42 Posts
That wasn't you in Meektharra was it Bloggsie...?!
RDO. Blissfully unaware of what was going on, except no jets over my house!
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 09:16
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mydadsbag
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Prick of a joint. Give it back to the Black fellas!

Bbbbbbbbzzzzzbzbzbbbbb
Mr.Buzzy is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 09:59
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Not at work
Posts: 1,571
Received 76 Likes on 32 Posts
Where did they come up with the 'one aircraft taxiing at a time' rule? Is it from MATS or just something they came up with in Perth?

And if you're going to restrict the use of the taxiways to one aircraft at a time, why not just use RWY 21 with a shorter taxi time (i.e. 3-4 mins) and double the rate you can get aircraft away
Transition Layer is offline  
Old 18th May 2011, 13:35
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Perth
Age: 71
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Where did they come up with the 'one aircraft taxiing at a time' rule? Is it from MATS or just something they came up with in Perth?

And if you're going to restrict the use of the taxiways to one aircraft at a time, why not just use RWY 21 with a shorter taxi time (i.e. 3-4 mins) and double the rate you can get aircraft away
1. CASA changes to Aerodrome operating standards made last year.. essentially No Stop Bars = Restrict ops to one aircraft on manouevring area during low vis ops

2. 21 is our preferred runway for low vis ops but we cant nominate a wet runway if there is any downwind
cac_sabre is offline  
Old 19th May 2011, 00:29
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: North W.A.
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reference the Wagan Air guys, thai, & other INTL operators into Perth.

You must wonder what their thoughts are on operating into YPPH.

I don't operate much INTL flying, but wonder if they get the same run around abroad as they do here.

Bit of a thread drift, but the poor old Wagan Air guys seem to always have a lot of trouble meeting their slot time at JULIM inbound.

Also had a laugh when the Emirates crew quizzed PH ground: "Do you have a accurate RVR or just some guy down the end of the runway counting lights?

Cheers.
kimberleyEx is offline  
Old 19th May 2011, 09:53
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Not at work
Posts: 1,571
Received 76 Likes on 32 Posts
cac_sabre,

Thanks for the explanation on both those matters. All makes sense now and seems like there needs to be major changes to the infrastructure (i.e. stop bars) for any improvement in the movement rates during Low Vis Ops.

kimberleyex,

Airports like LAX and LHR are far better equipped to handle that sort of weather. Low Vis taxi routes, Stop Bars, better taxiway lighting, Ground Radar etc etc. But they do have many more movements, and many many more days with very low vis so the money spent on that sort of equipment is definitely justifiable.

As for airborne delays, (getting off topic) LAX achieve most of their separation through extra track miles and speed control in the terminal area - but they do have 4 parallel runways to play with! LHR when busy is amazing to watch and their controllers are top notch. 10-20 mins holding is about as bad as I've seen unless the weather is ****ty and they still only have 2 parallel runways.

To put it in perspective, number of movements in 2009:

LAX - 634,383
LHR - 466,393
PER - 118,704

Cheers
Transition Layer is offline  
Old 19th May 2011, 12:34
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oztrailea
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To put it in perspective, number of movements in 2009:

LAX - 634,383
LHR - 466,393
PER - 118,704
Nice one, so Perth wins for the most efficient delaying aerodrome.!!!
flightfocus is offline  
Old 19th May 2011, 12:35
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 38
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also Thai were quizzed over and over again on their fuel state, was like pulling teeth apparently, not sure what the big secret was ... interesting
Thai decided to divert to Adelaide when they were unable to get in to PH only to discover about 45min into the trip to Adelaide they did not have enough fuel to make it, luckily by the time they made it back to PH the fog had cleared enough for them to get in.
melbATC is offline  
Old 19th May 2011, 12:40
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SA
Age: 63
Posts: 2,290
Received 133 Likes on 96 Posts
Perth movements in 2010 were 124,640 and still experiencing growth in 2011 (on target for 130K).

Last edited by sunnySA; 19th May 2011 at 12:43. Reason: clarity (or was that claret)
sunnySA is offline  
Old 19th May 2011, 14:29
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,551
Received 73 Likes on 42 Posts
LHR - 10-20 mins holding is about as bad as I've seen
While they have many more movements, they also benefit from rigidly controlled departure slots and traffic sequencing from all over Europe. It is not fair to just compare the numbers. Flight Focus take note.
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 19th May 2011, 16:52
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: between supple thighs
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bloggs,
Only those departing from a European Airport could/will be delayed.
There is NO vectoring, extra track miles, speed control enroute for flights overflying European Airspace into LHR, the delays (if required) are introduced by London control on first contact, along with the STAR. There are 4 gate posts inbound and holding if required will generally be at one of these gate posts. from the UK AIP "no delay" means less than 10mins holding.
Extra slots are available into LHR during the day, especially for VVIP flights. The number of VVIP a/c in LHR for the recent wedding is testament to this.
sleeve of wizard is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.