Bankstown Airport Management not HAPPY
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: southern land
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bankstown Airport Management not HAPPY
Minister reject BAL Master Plan
16 February 2011
AA023/2011
Bankstown Airport Master Plan Not Approved
Today I am announcing my decision to not approve Bankstown Airport’s 2010 draft Master Plan.
I am not satisfied that the draft plan gave the community sufficient information about the airport’s plans to allow for proper consultation.
In its proposed Master Plan, Bankstown Airport sought approval for up to 32 passenger flights a day.
This would be a significant change given the airport does not have any passenger flights at present.
Bankstown Airport is now required to develop and submit a new draft master plan following proper public consultation.
The current master plan remains in force until a new one is approved.
Over the longer term, the Gillard Labor Government is taking a comprehensive approach to Sydney’s aviation needs.
That is why we have established a joint taskforce with New South Wales to report on the capacity needs for the Sydney Basin, including sites for a second airport.
We have already made it clear that Bankstown will not be Sydney’s second airport.
The Government supports the operation of secondary capital city airports vital to general aviation, such as Bankstown.
Bankstown reply
Media Release
Bankstown Airport Perplexed by Master Plan Decision
Bankstown Airport Limited has today expressed its disappointment with the decision made by The Hon Anthony Albanese MP, Minister for Infrastructure and Transport, to not approve the Bankstown Airport Master Plan.
“At this stage the Airport will review its options in light of the decision” said Mr Colin Grove, CEO, Sydney Metro Airport Bankstown.
“We do not concur with the Minister’s view that we did not adequately consult with the community, as we consider that we have set a high benchmark in terms of Airport community consultation since the Airport was privatised. Specifically we consider we exceeded the Airports Act 1996 Regulations regarding community consultation in relation to the Master Plan. The Airport received 245 submissions from the public, which is evidence of an effective consultation process and we adjusted the draft Master Plan significantly as result of the consultation process”
“The Minister contends that the inclusion of a proposal for 32 scheduled passenger movements per day is a significant change to the Airport’s operations. We disagree with the Minister’s contention, as the proposal is an extension of the standing approvals from the Master Plan 2005, for 12 daily movements by Code 3C aircraft. To date a commercial operator has not sought to take up this opportunity.”
“The refused 2010 draft Master Plan clearly states that passenger services is a mid to long term objective likely to start at 16 movement per day progressing to a maximum of 32 movements per day in aircraft smaller than code 3C. Following the consultation process we revised the number of passengers based on smaller aircraft type and demonstrated that if passenger services were to be implemented the impact of this activity would be satisfactorily accommodated within the current Airport facilities.”
“The Airport acknowledges that there is an increase in the proposed number of aircraft but contends the proposed number of scheduled passenger movements would form 2.5 % of total annual movements of all aircraft at the Airport.
“We note the Minister’s comments regarding study on the future of Sydney’s aviation needs. We continue to propose that Bankstown Airport offers an important role to play in maintaining the commercial viability of general aviation and offers a unique and sustainable approach to niche scheduled passenger services for the growing population of Western Sydney” concluded Mr Grove.”
“The Airport continues to balance the regulatory obligations with the ongoing commercial viability of the Airport,” said Mr Colin Grove, CEO, Sydney Metro Airport Bankstown.
16 February 2011
AA023/2011
Bankstown Airport Master Plan Not Approved
Today I am announcing my decision to not approve Bankstown Airport’s 2010 draft Master Plan.
I am not satisfied that the draft plan gave the community sufficient information about the airport’s plans to allow for proper consultation.
In its proposed Master Plan, Bankstown Airport sought approval for up to 32 passenger flights a day.
This would be a significant change given the airport does not have any passenger flights at present.
Bankstown Airport is now required to develop and submit a new draft master plan following proper public consultation.
The current master plan remains in force until a new one is approved.
Over the longer term, the Gillard Labor Government is taking a comprehensive approach to Sydney’s aviation needs.
That is why we have established a joint taskforce with New South Wales to report on the capacity needs for the Sydney Basin, including sites for a second airport.
We have already made it clear that Bankstown will not be Sydney’s second airport.
The Government supports the operation of secondary capital city airports vital to general aviation, such as Bankstown.
Bankstown reply
Media Release
Bankstown Airport Perplexed by Master Plan Decision
Bankstown Airport Limited has today expressed its disappointment with the decision made by The Hon Anthony Albanese MP, Minister for Infrastructure and Transport, to not approve the Bankstown Airport Master Plan.
“At this stage the Airport will review its options in light of the decision” said Mr Colin Grove, CEO, Sydney Metro Airport Bankstown.
“We do not concur with the Minister’s view that we did not adequately consult with the community, as we consider that we have set a high benchmark in terms of Airport community consultation since the Airport was privatised. Specifically we consider we exceeded the Airports Act 1996 Regulations regarding community consultation in relation to the Master Plan. The Airport received 245 submissions from the public, which is evidence of an effective consultation process and we adjusted the draft Master Plan significantly as result of the consultation process”
“The Minister contends that the inclusion of a proposal for 32 scheduled passenger movements per day is a significant change to the Airport’s operations. We disagree with the Minister’s contention, as the proposal is an extension of the standing approvals from the Master Plan 2005, for 12 daily movements by Code 3C aircraft. To date a commercial operator has not sought to take up this opportunity.”
“The refused 2010 draft Master Plan clearly states that passenger services is a mid to long term objective likely to start at 16 movement per day progressing to a maximum of 32 movements per day in aircraft smaller than code 3C. Following the consultation process we revised the number of passengers based on smaller aircraft type and demonstrated that if passenger services were to be implemented the impact of this activity would be satisfactorily accommodated within the current Airport facilities.”
“The Airport acknowledges that there is an increase in the proposed number of aircraft but contends the proposed number of scheduled passenger movements would form 2.5 % of total annual movements of all aircraft at the Airport.
“We note the Minister’s comments regarding study on the future of Sydney’s aviation needs. We continue to propose that Bankstown Airport offers an important role to play in maintaining the commercial viability of general aviation and offers a unique and sustainable approach to niche scheduled passenger services for the growing population of Western Sydney” concluded Mr Grove.”
“The Airport continues to balance the regulatory obligations with the ongoing commercial viability of the Airport,” said Mr Colin Grove, CEO, Sydney Metro Airport Bankstown.
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sydney
Age: 43
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
???
Since when did you have to ask the minister for permission to fly AC out of an airport? I live by the mantra "it's easier to ask for forgiveness than permission".
Surely this can be circumvented; the airline operators just fly the AC in and out of the airport and BAL pleads "nescio quid" when questioned on it.
BAL is damned if they do and damned if they don't, when seen to be closing down the AP they get hammered, now they are trying to make it a viable AP and have been hammered from the other side!
So how many movements per day are there at YSBK? Surely 32 more won't make a difference...perhaps MAp has had a word ($$ donation) to MP Albanese.
Surely this can be circumvented; the airline operators just fly the AC in and out of the airport and BAL pleads "nescio quid" when questioned on it.
BAL is damned if they do and damned if they don't, when seen to be closing down the AP they get hammered, now they are trying to make it a viable AP and have been hammered from the other side!
So how many movements per day are there at YSBK? Surely 32 more won't make a difference...perhaps MAp has had a word ($$ donation) to MP Albanese.
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: inner suburbia
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't get this
If nobody in the past 6 or so years has wanted to do even 12 movements/day then why the bleep are BAL asking for 32/day ????
and
assuming a 12 hour day, I think they'd have problems even doing 12 movements/day through that so-called 'terminal'. I've seen better facilities out in the GAFA.
... an extension of the standing approvals from the Master Plan 2005, for 12 daily movements by Code 3C aircraft. To date a commercial operator has not sought to take up this opportunity.
and
... that if passenger services were to be implemented the impact of this activity would be satisfactorily accommodated within the current Airport facilities.
Join Date: May 2009
Location: hot on the heels of worthy targets
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is now Class D serviced. The old GAAP (no RPT) rules no longer apply.
... ewe's were warned about this when Skull and Dickie wanted the D changes
... but few understood the wood for the trees. 
32 .. oh gawd no .... says the Albo (as per script) .... will come back with a far more reasonable, middle ground/negotiated 22ish' ...
No terminal? .. oh that is EASY fixed
Wake up!! ... most PVT and Training GA .... priced out and gooooooorne in 10 years ... any bets?
... ewe's were warned about this when Skull and Dickie wanted the D changes
... but few understood the wood for the trees. 32 .. oh gawd no .... says the Albo (as per script) .... will come back with a far more reasonable, middle ground/negotiated 22ish' ...
No terminal? .. oh that is EASY fixed
Wake up!! ... most PVT and Training GA .... priced out and gooooooorne in 10 years ... any bets?
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: with your sister
Age: 42
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bankstown airport is gone ridiculous...... thats why we packed up and moved up north to the hunter at least we dont have to deal with the silly decisions that people with a larger than usual thorax sitting behind a desk pushing pencils.......
And plus here we do what we want and when we want without the wait of the flashing car that takes at least 45 mins to arrive for a 10 second job....
And plus here we do what we want and when we want without the wait of the flashing car that takes at least 45 mins to arrive for a 10 second job....
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wake up!! ... most PVT and Training GA .... priced out and gooooooorne in 10 years ... any bets?
