Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Things I bet you didn't know

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Jan 2011, 00:18
  #21 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
remember this guy like all the rest of us was taught by an instructor
You have a point Wally, but what about the CASA exams one is required to pass.

And can anyone tell me if there is ANY aircraft with a generator/alternator that does not have both a battery switch and a generator/alternator switch. Long time since I had anything to do with a 28-235 (1964ish) but seem to remember it had both.
Brian Abraham is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2011, 01:45
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hunter
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The worst bit is the pilot gets $500 for having his story published.
But is it worth the humiliation?
ajy29 is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2011, 02:09
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Australia - YMMB
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't CASA have their little "obviously this pilot made some bad decisions which they identified" say about the story at the end?

I'm keen to hear what CASA said about this one in particular...
Macchi 408 is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2011, 12:50
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sydney
Age: 43
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And can anyone tell me if there is ANY aircraft with a generator/alternator that does not have both a battery switch and a generator/alternator switch. Long time since I had anything to do with a 28-235 (1964ish) but seem to remember it had both.
I am not far into my initial training, and flown 3-4 different Warriors at my club so far. I am fairly sure at least one of them did not have the split master switch, because I had to do a double take to make sure I was not missing something.
SgtBundy is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2011, 15:29
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Alice Springs
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An aviation safety magazine will be ineffective if it prints nonsense, because it will not be respected by pilots. The industry needs a serious, quality magazine. A good one can be a very useful safety tool. I do not believe that this one is.
bushy is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2011, 17:11
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,792
Received 115 Likes on 55 Posts
The old Aviation Safety Digest, issue 141, made the same error in confusing Master Switches and Magnetos.

http://www.pprune.org/dg-p-general-a...ml#post4498625
Checkboard is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2011, 20:53
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: on the floor and I can't get up
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've heard of someone landing in a paddock due to electrical failure. Yes, it's true!

I'll never be a pax on domestic chinese flights.
Dangnammit is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2011, 23:10
  #28 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SgtBundy, wonderful what one forgets after 45 years. Ferreted around last night and found some old 172 and 28-235 notes and you are quite correct. No switch for generator, but you still had an ammeter and/or an under voltage light. One shouldn't have to wait until the battery is cactus to find the generator is not doing its job.

An aviation safety magazine will be ineffective if it prints nonsense, because it will not be respected by pilots.
bushy, what you say is correct in its context, but in this case it seems this article is a reflection (poor) on the pilot? who wrote it. Pity CASA did not give some commentary at the end of the article, as they often do. Perhaps in a perverse way they were letting the community know what is to be found out there.
Brian Abraham is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2011, 10:03
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 807
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
While on the subject of latest Flight Safety magazine I'm having a problem the Flying Ops quiz, question 10 on page 67.

10. When departing from a non-towered aerodrome a departure report
(a) is not required
(b) is not mandatory but is recommended.
(c) is required, and the minimum information required is departure location, tracking details and intended level.
(d) is required, and the minimum infomration reqiuired is departure location, tracking details, intended level, ETA at first reporting point.
Answer is (d) and the reference given GEN 3.4 5.14.8 is the format of a departure radio call from a non towered aerodrome.

I have only given a departure call from a non-towered field when departing IFR. I thought no call was required VFR. I cannot find anything in ENR 1.4 3.2 CTAF procedures and Procedures at Non towered aerodromes about a mandatory departure call for all aircraft at a non towered field.

Am I missing something?
bentleg is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2011, 10:32
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NSW Australia
Posts: 2,455
Received 33 Likes on 15 Posts
can anyone tell me if there is ANY aircraft with a generator/alternator that does not have both a battery switch and a generator/alternator switch.
Grob G115
Cessna C182G
Horatio Leafblower is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2011, 10:41
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Australia
Age: 53
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not missing anything Bentleg, its not required if your VFR. Time for a new editor me thinks.
Roger Greendeck is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2011, 19:47
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK... bracing for the flaming but i am a VERY new Pilot... yes i have my ticket and passed Air tech which may make this worse..

Rubbish! Since when does the master switch shut down the engine in a Warrior, albeit a 235 Dakota?....and. how can a flat battery be the sole cause of a fuel driven piston engine failing?
If the alternator goes it does not charge the battery, in this case the battery will run down eventually. you'll loose things like radios, lights, flaps if electric. but the engine will still run ... right? The batt holds the initial charge to start the engine and as a short term backup should the alt fail... right?

Also the PA38's and 28's i have flown have had both split and 'solid' master switches. any idea why?
FlyingKiwi_73 is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2011, 20:53
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: North Queensland, Australia
Posts: 2,980
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts
Kiwi, just read your tech notes and look at how a magneto works.
Your first two questions will be answered and you will have the satisfaction of having found it out for yourself.
Arm out the window is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2011, 00:39
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Brisbane, Qld
Posts: 1,370
Received 29 Likes on 15 Posts
Roger Greendeck Not missing anything Bentleg, its not required if your VFR. Time for a new editor me thinks.
True, not required, personally I give them anyways as the area i'm in can get quite busy and some of the places people go to you won't necessarily have heard of so knowing as they depart what direction they're going and what height they've decided to go there at can be very handy. Just a personal point I thought i'd make
Ixixly is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2011, 04:42
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The penultimate sentence of the article:

...if I had recycled the master switch, the engine would have still run, because...
The story is about a pilot who made a silly mistake or two, learned from it, and now wants others not to make the same mistakes. No reason at all to suggest a new editor is needed.

Even all-electric aircraft like the DA40/42 can have the electric master turned off in flight without suffering engine failure. In fact, is there any aircraft of any size whose engines require electric masters to be on?

Regards to all,
O8
Oktas8 is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2011, 05:03
  #36 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oktas, for a pilot to admit that he doesn't understand how the ignition system works is akin to saying he didn't know you have to fill the tanks with petrol for the engine to run. Silly mistake? No, rather an inexcusable lack of knowledge. And there was the lack of knowledge how transponders operate.
Brian Abraham is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2011, 05:19
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 807
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
there was the lack of knowledge how transponders operate.
Yes, he thought a transponder set to 7600 would be detected by other transponder equipped aircraft.

I have a problem with the magazine promoting this article, given the errors of fact contained in it.
bentleg is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2011, 07:40
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Brian. Yes, the lack of knowledge is inexcusable - but sadly more than rare. I support this kind of article because it promotes discussion about a topic that is so basic that it is "assumed knowledge" among most pilots. But on every occasion that I've had a flight test candidate suffer a real ignition or electrical related difficulty in flight, he or she has failed to address it correctly. So perhaps this kind of article needs to be published occasionally to remind aero club pilots of the basics.

The article should have had a more comprehensive error-correction sidebar.

Cheers, O8
Oktas8 is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2011, 20:24
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: South Pacific
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
8oktas

The article and its errors were easy.. - but pray.. what is this ? -
a more comprehensive error-correction sidebar.
frigatebird is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2011, 20:44
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NSW Australia
Posts: 2,455
Received 33 Likes on 15 Posts
The article should have had a more comprehensive error-correction sidebar.
An error-detection sidebar (EDS) is similar to an electrical bus bar. Usually located on the right hand side of the cockpit, a series of buttons and flashing lights labelled in accordance wth the HFACS taxonomy will alert the pilot (or instructor) in the event of a human factors failure.

An error-detection and correction sidebar (EDS+C) is an advanced sysytem interfaced with the autopilot and will cut the pilot out of the loop in the event of Human Error. This system is often found on Airbus aircraft.

Error-detection, correction and termination (EDSCT) is under development and will use electrodes in the pilots headset to terminate the pilot if an error is made.

The alarm system is connected to the pilot's brain through his headset and later models interface with Bluetooth adapters on the headset to notify your friends, via Facebook, that you have fcked up.


...or he could mean the little boxed column on the last page of the story where a CASA chappy plays Monday's Expert and tells everyone about the blindingly obvious errors made by the hapless pilot
Horatio Leafblower is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.