Gippsland Aero
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gippsland Aero
Heard someone mention that Gippsland Aerospace, the Australian maker of the GA8 Airvan planes has gone out of business. Searched the web (as well as Pprune) and checked the company's website; nothing about their going out of business.
In fact, I saw pictures of a GA8 Airvan on display at the AOPA Summit recently held in Long Beach, California.
I fly the GA-8 for the US Civil Air Patrol and was curious. Kind of a quirky but lovable plane. Not big on creature comforts but a good load hauler for a plane in its class.
Anyone know the story here ?? Thanks ..
In fact, I saw pictures of a GA8 Airvan on display at the AOPA Summit recently held in Long Beach, California.
I fly the GA-8 for the US Civil Air Patrol and was curious. Kind of a quirky but lovable plane. Not big on creature comforts but a good load hauler for a plane in its class.
Anyone know the story here ?? Thanks ..
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't be stressed mate, the Gippy Aero will be around for a while yet whilst Mahindra is involved. Mahindra are an extremely large Indian manufacturing organisation with arms into many different technology areas.
There was a whole other thread on this a while back.
So it's all good
There was a whole other thread on this a while back.
So it's all good
and I was down their way only 3 weeks ago 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Queensland
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep its owned by Mahindra Aviation Group.....same Indian based manufacturer of cars, steel etc etc. Very large and capitalised company who reckon they will give the ozzie aviation industry some "curry"!!
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tin Shed corner Bourke and Swanston
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Supposedly they have had a few letters of intent to order. I believe Grant Kenny Aviation was on that list but this was back in 08' so might not be so valid anymore.
Australian Flying: GippsAero buys Nomad for GA18 program
Based on the N24A Nomad, the GA18 will be re-engineered with upgraded engines, new propellers, glass cockpit, weight-saving measures, reduced maintenance requirements and aerodynamic refinements. A GippsAero spokesman told Australian Flying that its engineering team is on schedule to release details of the approved configuration of the GA18 – including engines, props and avionics to be used, and other improvements and refinements – at the end of September.
Based on the N24A Nomad, the GA18 will be re-engineered with upgraded engines, new propellers, glass cockpit, weight-saving measures, reduced maintenance requirements and aerodynamic refinements. A GippsAero spokesman told Australian Flying that its engineering team is on schedule to release details of the approved configuration of the GA18 – including engines, props and avionics to be used, and other improvements and refinements – at the end of September.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Maun, Botswana
Age: 37
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dont understand the GA10.
You have the C208A which is in the same class. Or the C208B which takes another 3.
OR you have the PAC750 which takes 9 with STOL and still cruises at 150kts.
Its putting itself into a market that already has 2 very good and proven examples flying.
The GA18 is putting itself up against the twotter... enough said with that one.
You have the C208A which is in the same class. Or the C208B which takes another 3.
OR you have the PAC750 which takes 9 with STOL and still cruises at 150kts.
Its putting itself into a market that already has 2 very good and proven examples flying.
The GA18 is putting itself up against the twotter... enough said with that one.
I dont understand the GA10.
You have the C208A which is in the same class. Or the C208B which takes another 3.
OR you have the PAC750 which takes 9 with STOL and still cruises at 150kts.
Its putting itself into a market that already has 2 very good and proven examples flying.
The GA18 is putting itself up against the twotter... enough said with that one.
You have the C208A which is in the same class. Or the C208B which takes another 3.
OR you have the PAC750 which takes 9 with STOL and still cruises at 150kts.
Its putting itself into a market that already has 2 very good and proven examples flying.
The GA18 is putting itself up against the twotter... enough said with that one.
I dont understand the GA10.
You have the C208A which is in the same class. Or the C208B which takes another 3.
OR you have the PAC750 which takes 9 with STOL and still cruises at 150kts.
Its putting itself into a market that already has 2 very good and proven examples flying.
The GA18 is putting itself up against the twotter... enough said with that one.
You have the C208A which is in the same class. Or the C208B which takes another 3.
OR you have the PAC750 which takes 9 with STOL and still cruises at 150kts.
Its putting itself into a market that already has 2 very good and proven examples flying.
The GA18 is putting itself up against the twotter... enough said with that one.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia
Age: 51
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When Mahindra first took over, they were flapping their gums about the companies commitment to leaving GA where it is, doing what it does. A whole bunch was said about the Reputation GA had built for itself, and that they didn't want to do anything detrimental to that image.
Would moving production to india harm that reputation?
IMO, yes.
As for the nomad, wasn't there some mob (Canada I think) that were talking about re-engineering and producing Turbine Caribous?????
Jas
Would moving production to india harm that reputation?
IMO, yes.
As for the nomad, wasn't there some mob (Canada I think) that were talking about re-engineering and producing Turbine Caribous?????
Jas
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Maun, Botswana
Age: 37
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When I think of the cost of a brand new PT6 and then think of how much is left over to build the rest of the aircraft... Throw in the cost of the avionics, it does make me shudder if they will still be making a profit.
We took 2 brand new Airvans last year. Both machines did around 1000hrs. Basically anything cosmetic on them has fallen off. It was just all glued on. I think the build quality is already shoddy enough before they start pawning them off to India.
Dont get me wrong, I think the plane is a great plane, but thats one of the issues I have with it.
We took 2 brand new Airvans last year. Both machines did around 1000hrs. Basically anything cosmetic on them has fallen off. It was just all glued on. I think the build quality is already shoddy enough before they start pawning them off to India.
Dont get me wrong, I think the plane is a great plane, but thats one of the issues I have with it.
Last edited by lilflyboy262; 1st Aug 2011 at 12:55. Reason: typos
Moderator
As for the nomad, wasn't there some mob (Canada I think) that were talking about re-engineering and producing Turbine Caribous?????
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We took 2 brand new Airvans last year. Both machines did around 1000hrs. Basically anything cosmetic on them has fallen off. It was just all glued on. I think the build quality is already shoddy enough before they start pawning them off to India.
I think the plane is a great plane, but thats one of the issues I have with it.
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Great to hear!!
My biggest problem with them was the lack of power, something like a 360hp engine would have been a dream, that and rudder trim...
Has the prop surging issues been sorted out yet? (left Africa now, so out of the loop)
My biggest problem with them was the lack of power, something like a 360hp engine would have been a dream, that and rudder trim...
Has the prop surging issues been sorted out yet? (left Africa now, so out of the loop)