The Right Stuff -Close contact instument flying
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Oz
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You can pick the clouds where you might loose sight of lead if only for a second or two. Any reasonably well developed cumulous cloud will normally do it. Quite common really. As stated earlier stratus is less an issue unless it has significant vertical extent with rain.
Last edited by BombsGone; 28th Sep 2010 at 00:26.
Superb hands-on skills and sound judgement for their years.
I fly in the UK with direct-to-right-seat cadets in the 737 all of the time, and in all honestly they are pretty good. Generally dedicated to the job, keen to pick up knowledge, spot on with SOPs and tech knowledge. the only differences you see are gusty landings (safe, but lack a bit of polish - which is more of a time on type issue than an underlying problem) and dealing with "unusual" operations - the ones which only come up every thousand hours or so.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: back of the crew bus
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are we talking about manual raw data instrument flying skills or about superb monitoring of autopilot, skills? Big difference in jet transports especially as most of the major airlines frown on manual flying.
So checkboard what you are saying is that they are 'generally' pretty good as long as nothing unusual happpens and its not gusty ... hardly confidence inspiring.
dunno what this has to do with formation in imc
dunno what this has to do with formation in imc
No, I am saying you can't tell the difference from their 3000 hour brethren, except for gusty landings or unusual situations - and in these you can see the low experience, but their performance is still entirely acceptable.
acceptable adjective /əkˈsept.ə.bl ̩/ adj
• satisfactory and able to be agreed to or approved of
• just good enough, but not very good
• satisfactory and able to be agreed to or approved of
• just good enough, but not very good
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: north of nowhere
Age: 34
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Oz
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am with Sanddune and BG on this one. IMC form is crazy stuff in a PC9, and yet they let studs do it. I remember initiating a loss of contact when I was in a 3 ship on the wing, and went from seeing the whole plane, to just seeing the port wingtip light. Bit hard to fly form when you have only a point source to fly off!!
But no, the instructor took over and told me to hang in there. New pair of jocks after that!! All whilst bouncing around in light turb. Not cool!
But no, the instructor took over and told me to hang in there. New pair of jocks after that!! All whilst bouncing around in light turb. Not cool!
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Victoria
Age: 62
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IMC form is crazy stuff in a PC9, and yet they let studs do it.
Remember doing a formation camp in Albany where most of the rides were done IMC. The lost contact procedure was also taught in IMC. Kept you on your toes!