Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Turbo Prop Command versus Jet F/O?

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Turbo Prop Command versus Jet F/O?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Mar 2010, 10:42
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Keep rowing minion....
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Turbo Prop Command versus Jet F/O?

Seeking the opionions of those wiser than I.... which would be considered more valuable with a goal of one day hopefully making it to the 'majors'?

Left seat in a 17/30/50 seat turbo prop?

or

Right seat in a 70/100 seat jet?
Tango November Bravo is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2010, 11:07
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,791
Received 112 Likes on 54 Posts
The turbo prop command requires far more skill and knowledge - and is a lot more fun.













... so it's the jet FO job, of course.
Checkboard is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2010, 12:57
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 3,097
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Cathay Pacific will accept 1000 hours either jet time or command turbo-prop above 20,000 kg MAUW for a direct entry FO position. A 50 seat turbo-prop might just be around 20,000kg, so as far as they're concerned they're almost equivalent.
AerocatS2A is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2010, 13:01
  #4 (permalink)  
PPRuNe supporter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agree with checkboard, but if your goal is to work at an airline, it will be on a jet, just a thought.
Dream Land is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2010, 14:07
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NTH&STH,EAST&WEST
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You will not be competitive with ATR72( or similar) time at Cathay for DEFO position, you will need lots of jet time.
Many DESO have that and some have jet time.
The Turbo prop requirement is designed for ex Airforce and C130 time and this also means they have jet time from earlier training.
40Deg STH is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2010, 02:54
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wherever the job takes me...
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you've got the option of either - and you want to fly turbo-props, fly turbo-props. If you want to fly jets, fly jets. It's that simple.

I prefer flying jets myself, and personally there's not a whole lot I'd be doing in the left seat that I'm not already doing in the right - except getting paid more for it (not to mention that I'm already getting paid more in the right seat of a jet than as a turbo-prop skipper anyway). And if that sounds like a flippant remark, rest assured I'm well aware of, and have great respect for, the fact that good command skills are so much more than how well one flies an aeroplane - or what type of aeroplane it is. But then I'm also not a 22yr-old-Gen-Y type who's been with the company only 12 months and already bitching about why I haven't got a command yet. All things in good time...
The Bunglerat is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2010, 05:09
  #7 (permalink)  
Sprucegoose
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Most airlines have a requirement of (x) number of hours on type before you can get a command, some even specify 'on company aircraft', none that I know of ask for multi crew command time. So if jets are what you want to do long term, the sooner you start down that path the better!

And I haven't even mentioned seniority!
Howard Hughes is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2010, 05:32
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: All at sea
Posts: 2,193
Received 151 Likes on 102 Posts
Howard Hughes hits the nail on the head. Direct entry commands on jets are fairly rare unless you want to head to some foreign location. Even then you won't get DEC unless you already have jet command. And you won't get that at home unless you start RHS. So if jets are your ambition, every year in turboprops is time lost toward the ultimate goal.
But which is the more satisfying job? Probably turbo-prop command. But can you live on satisfaction alone, or does ambition drive you? Your call.
Mach E Avelli is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2010, 05:55
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Where the work is.
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How about the one you actually want to take rather than the one you think is most valuable. I know getting to the Majors is your goal but people in this industry seem to forget the journey is the most fun part, do what you want and what makes you genuinely happy and I mean genuinely. You might not get to the majors for a number of reasons so make sure you get it right.


Have fun what ever that is.
Wildpilot is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2010, 11:49
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: flyville
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Both are valuable!! Depends on your experience. Multi -engine Turbo prop Command time is valuable ( esp Brasilia, Dash 8, Saab 340, F50) up to a point.

If you already have alot of Command Multi time go straight to for the Jet.
R.Cruizo is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2010, 12:09
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: QRH
Posts: 546
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Get some effo time on a turboprop, get into the jets, stay for a command and earn some $. Then you can afford to go back and fly a turboprop for fun and cash on the side to see you out until retirement. That's the ideal theory anyway.
Led Zep is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2010, 12:36
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Command time in a Multi-crew aircraft (bigger the better) will probably have more value than jet F/O time. Any plonker can fly (and let's face it, jets are veeerrry easy to fly) but not every plonker can handle a command.

PM
Piltdown Man is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2010, 14:57
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TNB good question - but also the wrong one. Wildpilot has the right idea.

My multi-crew turboprop command time was the most rewarding and the most enjoyable. It also gave my confidence a boost as a bonus.

I feel that command experience is beneficial for a jet F/O to have. It makes you appreciate and understand the operation more clearly. Sometimes the role of a Captain is not obvious, especially if you haven’t been one before. The biggest difference is the responsibility, and how that affects decision making. It’s very sobering when something goes wrong and you’re in the left seat. No amount of ICUS or co-pilot time can substitute for that.

Enough drunken rambling. All I can say is that you won’t regret going for a turboprop command. It’s more rewarding than being a jet F/O, and more fun than a Jet command.
Erin Brockovich is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2010, 19:50
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 2,303
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
A good friend of mine went from years of Turboprop command at the regionals to F/O at the majors. After about 12 months he said to me "Krusty, if they'd have me back I'd return to my old job tomorrow." At the time he was earning approx the same amount as a Jet F/O as he was as a Captain on the Turboprop. Money wasn't the issue for him at that time, he actually always wanted to fly a jet, but untill DJ came along opportunities were limited. As he found out however, the grass is not always greener.

Sadly (for the regionals that is) most Turboprop Captains now moving from the LHS (turboprop) to the RHS of a jet will in fact see a significant pay rise! Something most regional airline management have failed to grasp, to their ultimate discredit.

Anyway after about 4 years, my friend moved to command on the Jet. He would still rather fly the regionals, but admits the "real" money he is now earning will allow him the means to properly look after his family, and at least retain some dignity in retirement!

At the end of the day, that's what it's all about.
KRUSTY 34 is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2010, 20:54
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NSW Australia
Posts: 2,455
Received 33 Likes on 15 Posts
If you already have alot of Command Multi time go straight to for the Jet.
Hmm - how often does this happen? I have only met 2 pilots who went from piston twins into DJ. I am not blagging their professional skills when I point out they are both very attractive young women.

All the other people I know in DJ and JQ have significant turboprop experience.

I strongly suspect that for most of us mortals, the filtering applied to the database will always select the guys with the "biggest and best" experience first, meaning t/prop guys will always get in ahead of piston drivers.

....at least that's what I hope is going on.
Horatio Leafblower is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2010, 21:09
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south pacific vagrant
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I had my time again, I would stay in the turbo prop job I had.

Mint job, great people, easy rosters, good enough pay and lived in a great place.

But I got itchy feet with the "grass is always greener" thing.
waren9 is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2010, 21:15
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Aust.
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you already have alot of Command Multi time go straight to for the Jet.
Nah sorry mate - "as if".

I have over 4500TT and 1500 ME IFR CHTR yet despite blue stars etc have never had a bait from DJ or JQ for an interview.

Like Horation said, Pistons to jet just doesn't happen in this country without a furry logbook.
Snatch is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2010, 22:08
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 20 Posts
Horatio_Leafblower.. A bit of duff gen you're offering up there.

I personally know of 6 guys that went to DJ straight off piston twins with the 1500PIC and 500Multi-PIC around 2004/2005. 3 Of which are now captains on the 737.
havick is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2010, 22:38
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the early days of DJ there were ex-piston drivers who were having their command delayed so they could reach the company requirment of 3000TT before command course.

All turned out to be excellent operators and were a pleasure to fly with.

It all about your number on the seniority list
Grivation is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2010, 23:40
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NSW Australia
Posts: 2,455
Received 33 Likes on 15 Posts
Havick & Grivation

Guys that's great to hear

...doesn't match my observations, but I don't know everyone in the industry.

Yet

Snatch
I didn't say that and I think you're stretching things a bit there
Horatio Leafblower is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.