Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Dear Minister. Your airport security is a farce because...

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Dear Minister. Your airport security is a farce because...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Jan 2010, 10:56
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sydney NSW Australia
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dear Minister. Your airport security is a farce because... i can carry 100 Kg or more of whatever i like into the "secure" area of most terminals in australia simply by going up the stock loading elevator from the under terminal loading bay, with no security whatsoever in visual range. not to mention my loaded van/small truck i just parked under there.
Ultralights is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2010, 10:57
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aerosol, just about any aerosol + cigarette lighter = flame thrower.

Pencil = deadly weapon

It is impossible to protect an aircraft unless pax are loaded in their undies, fully x-rayed and strapped down.
sprocket check is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2010, 13:32
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lisbon
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Folly and a farce

Dear Minister. Your airport security is a farce because

1) You are a Politician - a complete tool who knows nothing about Aviation
2) Any idiot could drive through any of the large airports chain wire perimeter fences and park a vehicle loaded with the bad stuff under the wing of a large jet before the security guards have woken up or the ADF have left the comfort of their coffee room and television programs to investigate
3) All the larger AUS airports within your 'portfolio' sit next to the ocean where inbound jets fly a few hundred feet above trawler masts, easy pickings for any fruitloop who can rustle up a SAM from somewhere.

'Safe skies NOT,for all'
Cactusjack is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2010, 13:54
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: YBBN
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is why CASA give us so much paperwork to fill out, so we don't have time to fly before last light! Safe skies for all indeed!

Pyro
PyroTek is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2010, 22:21
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: broome
Age: 44
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is impossible to protect an aircraft unless pax are loaded in their undies, fully x-rayed and strapped down
Sir, there appears to be a rather large package in your pants. A strip search is going to be involved.
eeper23 is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2010, 00:50
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Sir, there appears to be a rather large package in your pants. A strip search is going to be involved. "
or
Sir, is that a canoe in your pocket or are you just pleased to see me??!!.......oh....it is?! Well....want to come back to my place then?
GADRIVR is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2010, 03:48
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: shivering in the cold dark shadow of my own magnificence.
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dear Minister. Your airport security is a farce because

An airliner catastrophe is more likely to be caused by cost-cutting; Rather than whatever metal sh!t the manufacturer put in my shoes.
psycho joe is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2010, 09:30
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Holland
Age: 60
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Try Kevlar

Pyscho joe,
Try kevlar caps in your boots. It is more expensive than steel capped boots, but less of a hassle when passing through the detectors. Plus if somebody cuts loose with an AK-47 in the terminal and you get shot in the foot, you will keep your toes ! Hey thats a good idea, perhaps Anthony Albancheese will include that recomendation in the 2010 White Paper ??
my oleo is extended is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2010, 07:04
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queensland Australia
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dear Minister
As aircrew in a queue in a regional airport, I watched a small kid wearing a back pack full of explosives (!), step around the metal detector and walk in to the secure area apparently unseen by the preoccupied security professionals. I was about to say something but then, .... airport shutdown probably 4 hrs ... miss my flight .... upset hundreds of travel plans ...... was he really a risk. Realised that security b-s had so alienated me they lost my cooperation. That's not good Minister
bilbert is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2010, 09:38
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stuck in the middle...
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Quote:
After being 'randomly selected' again, whilst in uniform, I asked the security person "why do you pick out the crew members all the time". His reply was, "because we have to do a certain number of searches per hour and you guys aren't allowed to complain. It's just easier this way".

Given that this indicates that the selection of people to screen is not random then a letter of complaint should be written.
I rarely venture into threads such as this, but... in order to check the 'randomness', could a union person not do some monitoring of this? That is, watch a checkpoint for a period and see what proportion of aircrew are checked?

Doubtless this would require some sort of approval so as to allow airside access but would this not be granted by the airport operator (rather than the security point operator)?
Taildragger67 is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2010, 10:03
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With smoking not permitted on most, if not all, aircraft these days, what do passengers need lighters & safety matches for anyway?
Because tobacco companies donate rather large sums of money to political parties.
dkaarma is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2010, 13:22
  #52 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,127
Received 22 Likes on 8 Posts
...because RA-Aus people don't need ASICs.
Charlie Foxtrot India is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2010, 23:47
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: au
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If RAA pilots don't need ASICs for a particular situation, then neither do GA pilots (use an AVID)
superdimona is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2010, 10:52
  #54 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,127
Received 22 Likes on 8 Posts
...or AVIDs.
ie No security check needed unless you hold a CASA licence.
Charlie Foxtrot India is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2010, 11:52
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollister, Hilo, Pago Pago, Norfolk Is., Brisbane, depending which day of the week it is...
Age: 51
Posts: 1,352
Received 31 Likes on 9 Posts
Because tobacco companies donate rather large sums of money to political parties.
No, because smokers pay for approx 60% of the public health care system.

Why do think they haven't banned it? Same reason as for pokies. THEY MAKE TOO MUCH MONEY! FCK doing the right thing!
(Yes, I do pay for all you "healthy" bastards!!)
MakeItHappenCaptain is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2010, 13:34
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Fantasy Isthmus
Age: 51
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dear Minister. Your airport security is a farce because...a large number of baggage handlers aren't Australian citizens and are employed by contract companies at low wages without security clearances (at least initially.)
TLAW is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2010, 13:47
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I regularly go through screening throughout the world carrying Diabetic syringes and needles...I have never been stopped or questioned
jammydonut is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.