Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Why do many "Airline" training organisations insist on flying such wide circuits?

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Why do many "Airline" training organisations insist on flying such wide circuits?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Jan 2010, 07:33
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Geelong, Victoria
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why do many "Airline" training organisations insist on flying such wide circuits?

As frustrating as it is for other circuit users, I can only assume that there is a good reason why circuits are taught this way?

Im not having a go at the schools, just trying to understand their reasoning.
Politically_Blonde is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2010, 07:51
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Take longer, learn less, make more money? What other reasons?
Super Cecil is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2010, 08:06
  #3 (permalink)  
Water Wings
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If only I knew.....

When instructing a few years back I was following an aircraft from one of these organisations in the circuit one morning. Sitting alongside me was a Widebody Skipper who was getting a bit of currency in a lighty.

As our downwind following the preceding aircraft reached some ridiculous distance, he turned to me and commented "I fly smaller bloody circuits in a 767"!

But then this same training organisation also forbid intersection takeoff's because "that's not what airlines do." Clearly the person who wrote the SOP's has never been to any major airport in the world!

Last edited by Water Wings; 14th Jan 2010 at 08:30.
 
Old 14th Jan 2010, 08:59
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Zealand
Age: 37
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I did my early training at Wellington International... we had to fly massive massive circuits so the neighbours don't cry about it. I've always had to overcome instinct to fly tight circuits at other aerodromes.

Last edited by Aerozepplin; 14th Jan 2010 at 09:36.
Aerozepplin is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2010, 09:03
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,792
Received 115 Likes on 55 Posts
If they're THAT big, drop inside them and land. When the inevitable complaint comes over the radio you can reply: "Oh!, I'm sorry - I thought you had departed the circuit on some sort of navigation exercise!"
Checkboard is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2010, 09:10
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If they're THAT big, drop inside them and land. When the inevitable complaint comes over the radio you can reply: "Oh!, I'm sorry - I thought you had departed the circuit on some sort of navigation exercise!"
Agreed. Have seen it done and have done it myself, but usually would ask ATC first.

"Tower, can we turn inside the 747 / wide circuit" or words to that effect usually do the job. If the controller then feels they are a bit wide, they will ask them to tighten it up. It's not always something you have to persist with unless the circuit is quite busy and they need to fit in their 8 aircraft per side.
VH-XXX is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2010, 09:50
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollister, Hilo, Pago Pago, Norfolk Is., Brisbane, depending which day of the week it is...
Age: 51
Posts: 1,352
Received 31 Likes on 9 Posts
It's because the instructor doesn't ask the student to assess their spacing, or if they do, don't ask them what they are going to do about it if it looks all wrong.

Seriously guys, when someone says "turning base behind the aircraft on ridiculously long final", THERE'S SOMETHING WRONG!

we had to fly massive massive circuits so the neighbours don't cry about it.
Fck em. They want to buy cheap next to the airport!
How loud is an O-320 at 1000' anyway???

Complaints like that should attract a set of low level circuits!
MakeItHappenCaptain is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2010, 09:58
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Karratha,Western Australia
Age: 43
Posts: 481
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Gee I guess none of you guys ever struggled early solo on downwind?

The airport I work at has a few schools that would fit this category and they generally aren't too bad. More often than not it depends on what level the student is at. From my days of instructing I recall most early circuit lessons the students struggled to get the pre landing checks done and the radio call on downwind completed (along with trying to fly the aeroplane). Whilst I like to keep it tight and would prompt along those lines, if I took over all the time how does the student learn? It was generally a non issue after a few lessons but still they can be busy early solo.

From an ATC perspective rarely will we tell you how to fly unless we specifically need it (ie Helicopter traffic inside the fixed wing circuit or about to leave the CTR).

Saying something can help, but a "can we tighten it up" has more effect than "am I following a 747 out there".
Awol57 is online now  
Old 14th Jan 2010, 10:11
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,792
Received 115 Likes on 55 Posts
From my days of instructing I recall most early circuit lessons the students struggled to get the pre landing checks done and the radio call on downwind completed (along with trying to fly the aeroplane)
From my days instructing, I would do the radio and checks for them, until they had the circuit OK - then increase the workload as gradually as they could handle it.
Checkboard is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2010, 10:15
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Karratha,Western Australia
Age: 43
Posts: 481
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
As did I. The point I was trying to make is that early on they are busy doing all that stuff. Some of the closest circuits I see (and I see a lot every day) are the solo "airline" students. They aren't always the guilty ones, just the easiest target.
Awol57 is online now  
Old 14th Jan 2010, 10:26
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Horn Island
Posts: 1,044
Received 33 Likes on 8 Posts
Well they aren't ready to go solo then are they?
RENURPP is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2010, 10:35
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Australia
Age: 41
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How wide are we talking? more than a mile?
Orion Delta is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2010, 11:50
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: On the move
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They sometimes fly seriously wide , I think I could do two circuits or close to that by the time they come in
ab33t is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2010, 12:02
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Zoo
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Because none of their instructors have had a real engine failure in a single yet..
kalavo is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2010, 16:44
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Godzone
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Easy - just ask for a glide or short approach and drop inside them. You'll catch them back up in 2-3 circuits, but it's all good - it's about SA and managing your own positioning. Or ask ATC for an opposite circuit. Don't get frustrated - turn it into a lesson that's more than a takeoff, 4 left (or right) turns and a landing.
toolowtoofast is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2010, 22:52
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 139
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've seen some ome in on a 2-3 mile final from the circuit, I just ask for the opposite direction to what they're using at the time.
Lindstrim is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2010, 00:09
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Some of the a/c being used have a nice engine out quality and glide a long way further than a 172 does.......and I can imagine that they could be the cause of your stress.

They could introduce sideslip into every cct and help you out!
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2010, 00:15
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
unfortunately most of the ones I have seen are in 172s or Grobs.

They don't glide to well.
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2010, 00:29
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Back again.
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Large ccts because:

1. The instructor is too busy listening to his/her own voice and thinking the student needs to have some time to listen. Talk on the ground. Instruct in the air! Practice approach and landings when it's time to practice approach and landings. Practice straight and level away from the circuit. If you, as an instructor, have something important to say, make a full stop and talk on the taxi back to the threshold.

2. The student thinks he/she needs to have a long, stabilised approach for a good landing or he/she is just enjoying the view. What a waste of money!
Lodown is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2010, 01:41
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: nocte volant
Posts: 1,114
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pretty frustrating at CN, especially if you are flying a Pitts or something similar. Overtaking rarely allowed and LL cts no longer permitted not a lot of fun to be stuck behind warriors, 172s and the odd Grob flying circuits big enough to warrant an alternate.
Trojan1981 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.