Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

ALAs - what's the go?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Nov 2009, 13:07
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: YMMB
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ALAs - what's the go?

I just have a question about where a private pilot can land their aircraft. I've heard of the term 'ALA' (authorised landing area?) being thrown around, and I assume that this term on analogous with airstrip.

A friend of mine has a relative with a disused airstrip on his property. What kind of steps would need to be taken to allow for the airstrip to be used for private purposes only? Does it involve dealing with CASA? Are there any limitations based on the fact that people that might use the strips will PPL holders only?
theflyinggeek is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2009, 13:12
  #2 (permalink)  
tmpffisch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
CAAP 92.1 is the source for all the info

http://www.casa.gov.au/wcmswr/_asset...s/ops/92_1.pdf
 
Old 3rd Nov 2009, 13:17
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: YMMB
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
After a skim read, does that mean that an area that any pilot wants to land on that meets the specifications in that document that you link is a legal place to land an aircraft.

In other words, it need not be registered with CASA?
theflyinggeek is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2009, 13:29
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Melburn
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This specifically came up in a flight-test recently.

In summary, you can land anywhere you deem safe and suitable. Obviously, the strip must meet certain dimensions and characteristics to be labelled an 'ALA', but as long as you, as the PIC are happy with where you are landing, that's all that matters.

Of course, you would use your common sense and establish the length, condition, and permission use to the strip.

A precautionary search and landing is of relevance to this.
rodrigues is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2009, 13:29
  #5 (permalink)  
tmpffisch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yup. Meeting the requirements of the CAAP would adequately ensure that the reguations are met. The strip would ideally get surveyed and graded, but doesn't need to be registered with CASA. However if an incident happened, they'd become very interested in the strip, hence why you'd want it surveyed.

Knowing the requirements for ALA's in CAAP 92.1 is definatly a CPL exam question, possibly part of PPL too.
 
Old 3rd Nov 2009, 20:47
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The reality is that you can land anywhere you want as long as the land owner gives you their permission, preferably in writing.

Just make sure IAW caap that it is moderately safe and try not to take out too many on the ground or your passengers when you spear in and burn.

You could take every precaution in the book and still get sued if something goes bad so solo flights into ad hoc landing areas are always good.
VH-XXX is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2009, 20:49
  #7 (permalink)  
Jazzy78910
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yep, basically land wherever the hell you want, but if something goes wrong, you need to be able to justify your choice of ALA, which will put you in the s**t if you haven't followed the recommendations in the ALA document from CASA (linked above).

Be aware that the document is a recommendation, not a requirement, but I wouldn't want to be answering questions after an incident on an ALA that didn't meet the recommendations from CASA.
 
Old 4th Nov 2009, 03:44
  #8 (permalink)  
Sprucegoose
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Unless you have contravened a Regulation Jazzy then there would be no case to answer, regardless of the dimensions of where you have landed!
Howard Hughes is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2009, 03:55
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Look at the clown recently who CASA threw the book at for landing on roads around his station......(and landing at a control zone without a clearance)

You can't just land 'anywhere' that fits ALA dimensions no matter what the CAAPs say.

Under the CARs you can't fly lower than 1000 feet over a populated area unless for the purpose of taking off or landing. I often wondered if I could land on the road outside a friends farm and taxi up to the homestead Yes it is a populated area although it is for the purpose of taking off and landing and the sealed road more than meets tha ALA requirements!

Interesting to ponder
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2009, 07:05
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Green Gobs, refer to my comments earlier:

The reality is that you can land anywhere you want as long as the land owner gives you their permission, preferably in writing.
Road = No (unless it is a private road, such as a station driveway, or med-1)
Farm = Yes with permission
Forrestry strip = Yes with permission
Beach = Yes with appropriate permission

That about covers most situations.... it's cut and dried case closed if you have permission.

Technically insurance companies don't cover unlicenced fields by default so you need to check with them to see that the field that you intend to use is covered.
VH-XXX is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2009, 12:36
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ˙ǝqɐq ǝɯ ʇ,uıɐ ʇɐɥʇ 'sɔıʇɐqoɹǝɐ ɹoɟ uʍop ǝpısdn ǝɯɐu ɹıǝɥʇ ʇnd ǝɯos
Age: 45
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Road = No (unless it is a private road, such as a station driveway, or med-1)
Farm = Yes with permission
Forrestry strip = Yes with permission
Beach = Yes with appropriate permission
What about water landing and alighting? Does the same apply? What's stopping me from operating from the Swan River near Fremantle (i.e. no OCTA)? If it's not a Civil Aviation Regulation then what would it be (the Swan River Trust, the local council)? What about near a popular beach really close to a city or somewhere like Rottnest Island?

Assuming I can't take-off from the Swan River in a little VH registered Searey and blast off to Rotto (about 12nm from Fremantle by memory) can I water taxi as if I were a boat and then take off once I am in open ocean?

This dream is a few decades away but I've wondered about it for a long time. I don't have a float or floating-hull endo so please excuse any terminology faux pas.

~FRQ CB
FRQ Charlie Bravo is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2009, 13:00
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: BackofBourke
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The place where you take off or land your aircraft needs to comply with either the licensed aerodrome or ALA requirements. The CAAP's may be an advisory publication, but you ignore them at your own peril. If something goes wrong, and the paddock is non compliant, you have little protection for insurance or CASA.

Your insurer will advise you the same.
tio540 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.