The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

NT Aeromed

Old 17th Dec 2008, 06:46
  #61 (permalink)  
Seasonally Adjusted
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: ...deep fine leg
Posts: 1,124
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would shudder at the the thought of going off shore with grasshopper.
There was that overwater bit at 'the head of the bite' between Forrest and Ceduna, but I was always too busy enjoying the view to worry about engines stopping.
Towering Q is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2008, 09:29
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Haunted House
Posts: 296
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The aircraft aren't the only problem...

A lot of talk about the aircraft here, and fair enough too - that's a big issue.

No one has said much about the crew shortage. It's pretty common to have delays for a U/S King Air, or fly a spectrum unit because the Aeromed ships are in the shed, but it's also pretty common to see delays for lack of crew. The only way to ensure dispatch (with respect to crew) is to roster 8 hour standbys. 12 into 11 DOES NOT FIT - even if you could fly "half a job" and hand off to the next crew.

Yet it has been like that most of this year, and some of the last I think.

I haven't had a chance to read the report yet.

CR.
Counter-rotation is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2008, 09:44
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 58
Posts: 2,210
Received 66 Likes on 34 Posts
You have enough pilots to cover the roster, including the late night operations, delays with patients, training, holidays, sick leave and all the other things that can go wrong.
Stationair8 is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2008, 19:09
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Perth
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IMHO the PC12 is a great machine.

You do not need to search too far back into the PPRUNE archives to read all the chest beating and bravado espoused by some about the Cessna Caravan ( also a great aircraft ), people stating the aircraft was statistically not ever going to have a engine failure and subsequently take a life.

Well that has been proven incorrect a great number of time.

An engine failure in any aircraft is not an "IF" statement, it is a "WHEN" statement, granted the turbine engine is expodentially more reliable than a piston, instead of an engine failure every 10,000 hours as suggested in pistons it may be every 100,000 hours for a turbine, but it does happen.

So in 100,000 flight hours a Baron will have 20 engine failures, very very unlikely to have two fail at the same time and the single engine turbine will have one, combining good gliding range with a well trained pilot, well it may infact be a good outcome.

For a B200 it will have two engine failures in the same 100,000 hours, the likelyhood of both emgines failing at the same time is any ones guess, and a B200 will climb at max weight on one engine.

The succes in the implementation of the single engine turbine into the trusted IFR role may be a Pyrrhic victory in the long term ( in your face Wiz ), time will tell.

Last edited by Lefthanded_Rock_Thrower; 18th Dec 2008 at 20:30. Reason: more goodera spelling
Lefthanded_Rock_Thrower is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2008, 00:51
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: melb
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'CR' true there was a time recently where lack of crews was perhaps a slight issue but not anymore, few are moving on around my way these days.
And as for changing crews mid way thru a task? Well it does happen more than most would think due crew hrs exhausting. This is done where a med team is in situ (in hossy) for extended periods of time due patient complications so a fresh crew/plane can be dispatched if available.

I think that eventually we end up talking about the pros & cons of SE v Twin because of all it's differences (& that's fair enough too) but most seem to back up the safety of a SE plane in 'ideal' conditions when an engine fails. High alt, perhaps reasonable wx with a visual appr at the end of it (glide) & a well trained pilot, all good & well but we often see the holes in the swiss cheese scenario line up even with 4 engined planes & multi-crew in ideal conditions so pilot ability only helps an outcome, doesn't guarentee a thing.
The biggest issue I would have with a SE plane in IMC ops is the T/off & ldg phase/s. This is where when an engine does fail there would be little if any options to have as far as a survivable ldg is concerned. Our major cities (unlike where country strips may have an out with flat terrain) where these planes obviously fly into are all surrounded by built up areas. I've watched many a PC12 depart from our base (EN) & I shudder to think what the outcome would be if one failed at say 300 ft for Eg. whilst taking off into a 30 kts breeze meaning a turn-back leaves the A/C assuming it can make the airport anyway with a very high speed touchdown. You could even have a 'lightie' taking off right behind the PC12 for Eg. with a 'green' pilot, he/her faced with multiple R/T from the twr & stricken A/C as well as a PC12 in his/her face could make for very interesting crash comic reading down the track.
The other thing that gets me with all of this is why do we go retrieve an at times critical patient out from nowhere in the first place only to have a higher risk ( I said higher risk, that's my belief) of both killing them plus the crew with a SE A/C? I would have thought ( & that's we we have twins) that 'saving' someone ment to give them )patient) the BEST possible chance of obtaining a fav outcome, go figure?
But most sections of the RFDS use the PC12, to me that's fine, I don't fly for them..............phewwwwwwwwwwwww
Still I ain't bagging the PC12 for EG, never have as many have said great plane & probably is, but you guys know me they (SE planes ) have their place just not under my bum
Okay am sure most are tied of this, am happy to wind up, for now

Wally Mk2
Wally Mk2 is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2008, 02:11
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Haunted House
Posts: 296
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stationair8

Pretty short post there. No problem, if it was correct.

Are you suggesting that late starts, unavailability due 24 hrs off, etc. are not happening AT ALL? Have never happened AT ALL? Loss of coverage due ONE GUY going sick doesn't happen AT ALL, EVER? If their crew situation was as you have described, it wouldn't.

Your statement is not correct AT ALL, in fact (not opinion) as these things are, whilst not frequent, certainly not uncommon. Two years ago there were at least 8 B200 crew at Pearl's Darwin base. Now there are 5.

This is not a flame, but I feel I must respond to your post. Perhaps you could give some more detail, so I can understand why you would make such a statement?

To be specific, I am talking about Pearl - and I think most others here are too, though "NT Aeromed" (thread title) could be RFDS Central...
Counter-rotation is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2008, 02:36
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 58
Posts: 2,210
Received 66 Likes on 34 Posts
To run a true 24 hour aeromedical operation you need to have the pilots to do it, and includes allowing for proper staff numbers, coverage of sick leave, annual leave, training, extended tours of duty if Pearl operate under CAO48 concession, late night operations and the fact of when the airlines go into recruitment mode you will lose staff.

I heard that Pearl were short of drivers, because the training pilots were line flying with the new guys to get up the night experience requirements. Didn't Pearl have a couple guys leave during their endorsements?
Stationair8 is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2008, 04:12
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CR

When NT Aeromed is mentioned there should be no doubt that it refers to the Pearl Aviation operation.

RFDS Central Section is not NT Aeromed.

Like Pearl they are contracted to NT Health
Desert Duck is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2008, 18:33
  #69 (permalink)  
Silly Old Git
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: saiba spes
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
RFDS Central Section is not NT Aeromed.
Might well be soon?
tinpis is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2008, 08:26
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Alice Springs
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
El cheapo aviation services?

Many of australia's outback aviation services are impoverished, and I fail to see how they can ever recover until our numerous governments start paying real costs for proper services.
We have "not for profit" often subsidised organisations iand/or organistaions that get donations from the public, issued with AOC's and tendering for government contracts in competition with companies that have to pay all the commercial costs without being able to get contributions from the public or subsidies. One not for profit organisation states that potential pilots have to organise a cash flow that is suficient to pay their wages and expenses.
Our government seems to be using this as a system of favouritism and a means to get cheap services. I think it is unfair and unscrupulous, and the result is that there is insufficient money paid for the government services. Some tenderers can get "top ups" from the public, or other government sources. Others cannot.
Aeromed services are affected. AOC's should not be issued to "not for profit" organisations. AOC's are for business purposes.
Until we sort that out we will always have impoverished
air services with lots of associated problems.

I am not saying any particular organisation is impoverished.
bushy is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2008, 20:47
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: The Hornets Nest, NSW
Posts: 832
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ahhhh, the Pprune of 10+ years ago is back - useful threads, excelent banter....

Bushy is spot on again. Those organisations that hide behind either/and/or a spiritual cloak and not-for-profit business models do indeed make competition difficult for dedicated for profit companies. Look at Bushy's home town to see the difference in the market when one of those companies being referred to funnily enough somehow went broke after plans for market domination went a bit awry.....

It will be sad to see and I guess there will be many people with emotional ties to the companies involved but from what I read these days of the aeromed situation there in the Territory (effectively three providers if you count Barkly Aeromed) it is long overdue for rationalisation and intergration into one operation without the duplication of operational capabilities and management teams all pulling in their own directions.

From previous exposure to Government policy while I was involved in a Volunteer organisation the one thing that will end-up forcing the issue will of course be the various levels of Government. The reason is that Government Departments hate dealing with more than one entity and see duplication of offices, managers, aircraft etc etc as a waste of $$$$$ and believe me, they will get their way in the end.

Regards,

OpsN.
OpsNormal is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2008, 23:20
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: melb
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Too thrue there 'opsNormal' with yr post. I like the bit at the end though, you quote..........."The reason is that Government Departments hate dealing with more than one entity and see duplication of offices, managers, aircraft etc etc as a waste of $$$$$ and believe me, they will get their way in the end".
The above highlighted words discribe the Govt itself not just an aviation Co. The trouble is the Govt (any Govt) haven't got a clue when it comes to aviation related contracts, the 'Aman" Aviation debarcle was a perfect Eg. But yr right an overhaul of the top end aeromed requirements doess appear to be needed.
Useful threads & excellent banter hey? Lets hope it stays that way but I have my doubts




Wmk2
Wally Mk2 is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2008, 04:44
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: The Swan Downunder
Posts: 1,110
Received 49 Likes on 34 Posts
Guys, you hang on to those B200's for as long as you can, flying around at night in any commercial operation, particularly in the territory is an accident waiting to happen.
In my life time, a bit less than 20,000 hours I have experienced 2 catastrophic failures and 4 engine shutdowns, one of those catastrophic failures was at night as was 2 of the shutdowns, both oil pressure failures all of them turbine all but one in a PT6 deriviative free power turbine.

Needless to say had those been in a single engine aircraft, its very likely I wouldnt be here today.

I always looked at airmed as a great little retirement gig, however if it's to be in singles well "f**k that" you guys must be nuts.
Xeptu is online now  
Old 21st Dec 2008, 05:29
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: melb
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'Xeptu' yr post makes you my bestest new friend
20K hrs hey? Tell us more, I won't live long enough to get to those figures.
SE engines in anything other than VMC by day is crazy anyway but hey if not for those missguided guys/gals what would we have to talk about here? Govt policies on aviation?
I'm not so sure the central section of the RFDS are breaking their necks to tie up a sole contract with the NT Govt anyway. Anyone know otherwise?


Wmk2
Wally Mk2 is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2008, 08:04
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Haunted House
Posts: 296
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The way things are at Pearl at the moment, I would be standing by for a few PT-6 failures, too!

That statement is a criticism encompassing not just the age of the aircraft, but the performance of the engineering department (and you can include the Metros in that too). The engineers have been shat on by management, and are in general pretty pissed off I would say, and rightly so. They are working hard and do not get what they need from management to do a proper job. That's my observation, anyway.

As for NT Aeromed -

1) The NT Government either don't know what provision of the service at a good standard requires, or they know and are unwilling to fund it.
2) Pearl management are ASLEEP AT THE WHEEL as far as running the company, and it is affecting ALL operations, and the Govt's aeromed contract is affected as part of that.

CR.
Counter-rotation is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2008, 08:11
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Aust
Posts: 201
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
SE engines in anything other than VMC by day is crazy
You old dinosaurs are hilarious.

But that's ok.

You haven't got long to go, so we'll forgive you...
rcoight is online now  
Old 21st Dec 2008, 09:33
  #77 (permalink)  
Bugsmasherdriverandjediknite
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bai, mi go long hap na kisim sampla samting.
Posts: 2,849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You old dinosaurs are hilarious.
Bwahahahaha. now, where did I leave that popcorn.
Gorn Wally....... sic im.
the wizard of auz is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2008, 10:01
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: melb
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.........relax 'wiz' these young whiper snippers self destruct in time anyway, us old buggers are like a splinter in ya finger, they pick at us trying to rid the pain but they know there's always another 'piece of wood' ready to be handled again

Wmk2
Wally Mk2 is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2008, 14:04
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Aust
Posts: 201
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
Please define

these young whiper snippers
(sic)

You guys make me laugh.

Why do you think that number of posts on PPRune = experience in aviation?

I would have said that it's inversely proportional, myself...

Those of us who actually fly for a living, and have a life once they go home, have probably got more relevant stuff to say about life as a pilot than the sad gits who sleep with their Jepps every night....

When you can produce something other than "gut feeling" about the relative safety of PC12's compared to King Air's, let me know...

Bottom line is that I wouldn't try to claim I'm an expert about an aircraft I've never flown...
I've got 1500+ hours in PC12's... and 3000+ hours in piston twins.
I know what I feel more comfortable in

Wally, how many PC12 hours have you got?

0.00?

That's what I thought.

Have you noticed I've never made a comment about B200?
Cos I've never flown one, so I won't pretend I'm an expert.
Fantastic aircraft, no doubt.
But, you know what?
Bit of respect wouldn't go astray...

Good luck to you for not having to embrace new technology, but don't insult me and the rest of us because we are prepared to....

We're all on the same team!

Good man.

rcoight is online now  
Old 21st Dec 2008, 14:30
  #80 (permalink)  
Bugsmasherdriverandjediknite
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bai, mi go long hap na kisim sampla samting.
Posts: 2,849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
heeehehehe. Heres that popcorn I was looking for.
Why do you think that number of posts on PPRuNe = experience in aviation?
I can't seem to find any reference to that statement being made anywhere.
I have to wonder why people make this claim. but if it makes you feel any better, I have many times my post count in hours flying in five countries, and I do have a life. I just find it entertaining here and would rather spend time here than watching television. I bet you have many more hours watching television than I have posts here. Each to his own though.
Cheerio old chap.

Last edited by the wizard of auz; 21st Dec 2008 at 15:09.
the wizard of auz is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.