Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Frog airplanes. Can you really trust them?...

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Frog airplanes. Can you really trust them?...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Dec 2008, 00:58
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sunfish, I agree ****y gauges on the tb10 that don't work half the time
also they glide like a crowbar. Pretty to look at though and a nice comfy seat.
Aerodynamisist is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2008, 01:11
  #22 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I agree ****y gauges on the xxxx that don't work half the time
also they glide like a crowbar.
This quote could easily refer to a PA28-140, or a GAF Nomad, or any number of non French aeroplanes.

My only French experience was the Nord 262, and that was a very good introduction to multi-crew flying and systems more sophisticated than the mechanical flaps of the PA28s, or electric flaps of the 100 series Cessnas.
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2008, 01:29
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: lost
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looking at the stats aren't most fatalities in aviation still accredited to controlled flight into ground?
fleebag is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2008, 02:04
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: asia
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did'nt a MAS 777 have a similar incident to the recent QF330 over WA ?

Most if not all Airbus ( FBW ) accidents have been finger/operator trouble including the 1st one that mashed into the forrest.
Airbus golden rule number 1 : If in doubt disconnect the autopilot and autothrust, it will fly like a normal aeroplane ( inc moving thrust levers for the paranoid ones out there ), it just won't let you stall or get slow or over bank or over pitch.

Having flown the NG and the Airbus I can say one thing, Boeing have a damn cheek calling that thing an " NG ", there aint much new about it
hongkongfooey is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2008, 02:25
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 477
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Frog aircraft? The Tobago leaks through the Gull Wing door seals and the POH is always soggy as a result.

Then there are those tiny bar type gauges that you have to tap to get any reaction.......

And the overly sensitive elevator.
Sounds just like a bad example (or badly maintained). I dont have these issues with my Tobago. I rather like it actually.
Bevan666 is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2008, 02:51
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 1,393
Received 20 Likes on 6 Posts
That's not a Frog aircraft. This is a Frog aircraft.



It's actually a TG Mk 2 towed target built by International Model Aircraft who also made the Frog range of model kits. It flys by virtue of the latest HBW technology - Hangs By Wire.
Fris B. Fairing is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2008, 04:52
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: nocte volant
Posts: 1,114
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I for one feel a little hesitation about flying in a 737 due to the as yet unexplained rash of rudder hard overs
Apparently they concluded it was caused by "cold soaked" PCU's reversing the command input given by the pilots. There is an AD.
Boeing 737 Rudder Design Defect, Airline Safety, 737 crashes, rudder PCU, 737 Colorado Springs crash, US Air 737 crash

If I'm not flying it, I'm scared of it!
Trojan1981 is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2008, 06:45
  #28 (permalink)  
Silly Old Git
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: saiba spes
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Pretty good



Engines were a bit weak....

tinpis is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2008, 01:05
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The tone of most of the statements on this thread suggest to me that what most of you are saying is... "It's french so therefore I don't trust it".
What a ridiculous argument.

Remember that there have been plenty of rubbish aeroplanes that have come out of the USA, but does that make all US aircraft equally poor quality?

Airbus have been running civil FBW aircraft without incident for longer than many of you people have been alive.

It's P Prune not Prune. Though recently I startedt to wonder about that.

Edit to add:
I'd also like to stress what someone said earlier. Airbus is equally German. Bear in mind that most people tend to have a very biased perception of French engineering to German engineering.

Last edited by nick2007; 2nd Dec 2008 at 01:09. Reason: To add to my tirade
nick2007 is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2008, 04:01
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mydadsbag
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for clarifying that Nick.
I guess we all forgot that extra "P" for Professional. How terribly unprofessional of us!
I'll be sure to go extra hard on myself

bbbbbbbbbbzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzbbbbbbbbzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Mr.Buzzy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.