USAF Out of Ideas
Thread Starter
Retention and recruiting are two sides of the same coin: proper size of the USAF pilot group.
I know it could be contrary tothe service, however moving a guy with a family every 6 months-2 years would be hard on a marriage, and kids. Maybe shorter tdy's, and guaranteed stays in a base would help
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mare Nostrum
Age: 41
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Must have been a foreign military. Looking at Megan’s use of English, and referencing Air Force F-18s, my guess is Australia.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Thanks again, and I was wrong about decades since the USN gave aviator wings without a four-year degree. It appears that a little over a decade ago a few Chief Warrant Officers were designated with two-year degrees in a short-lived program that was terminated when the world economy tanked and retention improved.
One point of view, USAF is the only US service I've not worked with, so can't comment.
https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/04/24...ership-crisis/
Counter view.
https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/05/04...ilot-shortage/
https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/04/24...ership-crisis/
Counter view.
https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/05/04...ilot-shortage/
Yep, the retention rate is a problem so they have to recruit and train quite a few. They've said they're increasing the training capacity but aren't where they need to be. The quoted numbers are in some of the Air Force Times articles. I think they said they're up to training 1100/year but need to have 1400/yr...or something like that. If I weren't so lazy, I'd go back through the articles and find the quotes.
Retention and recruiting are two sides of the same coin: proper size of the USAF pilot group.
Retention and recruiting are two sides of the same coin: proper size of the USAF pilot group.
Not suggesting they be WO's, saying remove the requirement for a degree so they cast a wider net. You don't need a degree to occupy a cockpit, it's jokingly said in airline conversation all you need to know maths wise is your three times table. Young lad I know in the Navy just graduated with his wings, high school education, dux of his course, and given the offer to swap to the Air Force with the promise of F-18 if he does as an inducement, but he wants to fly choppers, so staying Navy. Flown with many a high school educated US Army WO and only one out of the lot I would have torn the wings from, needed to have the fact that Daddy was a Colonel knocked out of him.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mare Nostrum
Age: 41
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not sure where your story came from but it’s wrong. The Navy is not putting non college graduates in flight school. If he has a degree and just got his wings he would have been in the Helo pipeline and is not qualified for fighters. He would need to go through the entire jet pipeline first. Last point is the AirForce does not have any F-18’s.
Thread Starter
“Last September, Air Education and Training Command head Lt. Gen. Darryl Roberson said that the Air Force hoped to increase the pilot training pipeline to 1,400 within a few years. But, he warned, even maxing out pilot production capacity at 1,400 wouldn’t be enough, and the Air Force needed to train 1,600 new pilots annually.”
https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/y...vere-shortage/
Thread Starter
https://forums.jetcareers.com/forums...ary-pilots.11/
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mare Nostrum
Age: 41
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts