Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > North America
Reload this Page >

Another wrong rwy close call at SFO

North America Still the busiest region for commercial aviation.

Another wrong rwy close call at SFO

Old 11th Jan 2018, 14:37
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: California
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another wrong rwy close call at SFO

Aeromexico cleared to land on 28R, lined up on 28L with Virgin holding for takeoff. Tower issued G/A with AM 668 at 600 ft alt.

No incorrect procedure. Tower cleared for 28R, got correct readback.
Tuesday, 11:49.

Not saying it is tower, but third in a year? Something wrong with SFO?

Last edited by mkenig; 11th Jan 2018 at 14:42. Reason: Add to land
mkenig is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2018, 15:15
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,787
Received 196 Likes on 90 Posts
FR24 confirms that the VRD A320 was on the piano keys as the AMX B738 went around.

Ouch.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2018, 15:24
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: California
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it the offset approach?

Admit I'm not a commercial pilot, I am a System Analyst. The incidents at SFO seem to have increased in frequency since the offset approach procedure was instituted. Could that be a contributing cause? Is it too different from approaches elsewhere? Are the 1950's RWYs too close and too similar? Comments from the pros?
mkenig is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2018, 17:33
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Suitcase
Posts: 70
Received 15 Likes on 7 Posts
We landed 5 minutes ahead of this Aeromexico flight and heard the ground controller give the crew a phone number to call for a 'pilot deviation' incident. Was wondering what all that was about until I saw it here.

Well, SFO was using 28L ILS and 28R ILS approaches during that time of the day so it may well be that Aeromexico had the 28L ILS programmed in the box and wasn't expecting 28R. Especially since they arrived on the SERFR2 arrival just like we did, which 90% of the time, will have you land on 28L as the SERFR2 links in with 28L ILS approach at waypoint MENLO. But rarely do you fly straight in to the approach at SFO as ATC will radar vector you all over the place, before you intercept the localizer for the ILS.

Complacency perhaps was to blame here and possibly not updating the box with the 28R ILS when it was assigned. That's my guess anyway.
Hollywood1 is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2018, 17:50
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: gatwick
Age: 50
Posts: 170
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Pretty good plausible explanation. Let’s stay with that till something breaks.
rotorwills is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2018, 18:23
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Toronto
Age: 57
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How long was AMX on the "wrong" loc before the missed approach was called?
cossack is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2018, 18:26
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Between a Rock and a Hard Spot
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Confirmation bias?"
HEMS driver is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2018, 18:34
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Doesn't SFO Tower have radar?
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2018, 18:57
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,787
Received 196 Likes on 90 Posts
The lowest point that FR24 captured on the first approach was approximately 0.6 nm from the threshold.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2018, 20:28
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Toronto
Age: 57
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not what I meant. From how far out was he on the"wrong" loc? If it was say 10 miles, that would be at least 2 minutes for someone to notice, that didn't.
cossack is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2018, 21:04
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,787
Received 196 Likes on 90 Posts
Ah, OK.

He was lined up with 28L from about 9 miles out, roughly abeam Bair Island and about 4 minutes from the threshold.

When you talk about noticing it presumably you mean on radar? It would be very difficult for the tower to discern which runway he was pointing at when that far out.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2018, 22:27
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Toronto
Age: 57
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe, maybe not. We have runways 1000' centreline to centreline. SFO's are 750'. Our tower radar displays the extended centrelines out to about 8 miles and because of the range of the display, we could (not saying we would) see if an aircraft is on the wrong centreline at 8 miles.

If SFO tower has a piece of radar equipment that we call Airspace Warning Feature, they would receive a visual and audible alert that he was incorrectly positioned at about 2 miles out. That would coincide with the issuance of missed approach instructions.
cossack is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2018, 04:19
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: phoenix, AZ, USA
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SFO has precision approach monitoring capability. Look at the PRM plates for SFO. Looks like they need to start using that capability a little more.
cactusbusdrvr is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2018, 07:12
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suppose that it is always good to double check that ILS frequency as well. Or identify it and identify it properly.
JammedStab is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2018, 10:15
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What type was AMX? There was talk during the AC Incident that AB crews on FMC approaches did not always tune ILS.
RAT 5 is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2018, 12:35
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Dave; in which case the/an ILS should have been tuned and ID'd.
RAT 5 is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2018, 23:13
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Age: 71
Posts: 3,407
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
How ‘bout looking at the airport critically and identifying BOTH runways and remembering what you read back to the tower. I can’t believe aviation has sunk to this level.
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2018, 02:25
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let's not forget one of the principles of our industry. The general concept is to share information so that the mistakes of others are published to prevent reoccurrence. One would have hoped that previous events would have become known to all operators into SFO and warnings issued about the risk. To have multiple similar errors over such a short time frame is very disappointing. As well as commenting on each individual event it would be prudent to ask why they continued to reoccur. There seems to be a weakness somewhere that needs strengthening. If that weakness is in SFO's local procedures, that is one issue to address; however my initial comments are more focused on why crews are repeating this mis-identification.when they should be aware and extra vigilant.
RAT 5 is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2018, 06:24
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,787
Received 196 Likes on 90 Posts
We should be careful about making generalisations about "recurrence" - all three events were different (albeit two involved the same airline) and one of them (AC781) didn't feature a misidentification,
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2018, 12:05
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would also think that with the SFO set up, it doesn't matter how aware one tries to be, it's ripe for a mistake to occur when there's the odd lapse of concentration once in a blue moon. I don't blame the crews, I blame the procedures and frequent last minute changes by approach or even the tower.
Hotel Tango is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.