Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > North America
Reload this Page >

Pilot killed in crash at Travis AFB air show

Wikiposts
Search
North America Still the busiest region for commercial aviation.

Pilot killed in crash at Travis AFB air show

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th May 2014, 18:01
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ormond Beach
Age: 49
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You're not doing aerobatics 5' off the deck, though.
flyboyike is offline  
Old 8th May 2014, 01:22
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Timbukthree
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not too many F1 drivers over 50 years of age. The oldest was 58, I believe.
In 2013, Michael Schumacher at 44 years of age, was the oldest current driver on the F1 circuit, until he sustained a serious head injury while skiing. He retired in March, 2014.

NASCAR drivers average age is between 25 and 40, so perhaps similar to F1, but Morgan Shepherd, at age 72, is the oldest active NASCAR driver.
He failed to qualify for this year's (2014) Daytona 500.

And who can forget New Zealand's Burt Munro, who, in 1967, at 68 years of age, set a world speed record for motorcycles under-1000 c.c. The record still stands.

Due to an ageing demographic, the average pilot age is indeed increasing. I don't doubt that we will see more crashes involving senior, (65 and older), aerobatic pilots, as well as recreational/private pilots.

RPV pilots withstanding, I doubt that many of the world's air forces are going to recruit 43 year-old fighter pilots any time soon.

As of 2013, the life expectancy of a white male living in California is 80 years. Life insurance premiums don't decrease as we age. Dang it anyway..!

Last edited by evansb; 8th May 2014 at 07:50.
evansb is offline  
Old 8th May 2014, 18:40
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ormond Beach
Age: 49
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by evansb
Due to an ageing demographic, the average pilot age is indeed increasing. I don't doubt that we will see more crashes involving senior, (65 and older), aerobatic pilots, as well as recreational/private pilots.
I'm afraid you're right, especially as this "aging demographic" seems to with age lose the ability to conduct any sort of even basic, common-sense risk assessment. A case in point would be our friend Desert185's comparing his successfully flying a 747 at FL370 to low-level skydancing in a Stearman. Those two situations have nothing in common other than both involve an airplane.
flyboyike is offline  
Old 8th May 2014, 18:59
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Shelton WA.
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Perhaps Ernest Hemingway sums it all up:
"The error of youth is to believe that intelligence is a substitute for experience, while the error of age is to believe experience is a substitute for intelligence."

Happy Landings.
Gemini Twin is offline  
Old 8th May 2014, 19:07
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ormond Beach
Age: 49
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very, very well-put.
flyboyike is offline  
Old 8th May 2014, 21:05
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With regard to this accident I made this comment in my first post.

In Europe we had a 200 foot floor at all airshows that was very strictly enforced , had there been the same 200 foot floor limit at the airshow in which this pilot died he would still be alive.
Had such a restriction been in place we would not be having this conversation. ( Assuming he did not have a heart attack or a stroke. )

We can not control aging, we can control safety to some extent.
Chuck Ellsworth is offline  
Old 8th May 2014, 21:50
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Western USA
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With regard to this accident I made this comment in my first post.
Quote:

In Europe we had a 200 foot floor at all airshows that was very strictly enforced , had there been the same 200 foot floor limit at the airshow in which this pilot died he would still be alive.
Had such a restriction been in place we would not be having this conversation.

We can not control aging, we can control safety to some extent.
...and, unless making a biased and uneducated assumption, we still don't know if age was a factor in this accident. Assumptions abound, but that doesn't make fact. If so, we would have to readily attribute youth and inexperience to accidents involving the younger and less experienced demographic group within our profession.
Desert185 is offline  
Old 8th May 2014, 22:20
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Desert185 I am not making a statement of fact regarding this persons age having been the factor in his death, I am merely saying that surface level inverted ribbon pick ups leave little room for error and from what I have read on this accident there was a wind factor during that performance and it was his second attempt at the pick up.

Therefore had there been the same height restriction at that air show as we had in Europe the accident would not have happened.

Another interesting issue regarding the 200 foot limit for low level demonstrations was the crowd could actually see the demonstration, conversely when the airplane is only a few feet above the runway a lot of the people cant even see it.

My personal opinion is really not all that radical, I believe that flying demonstrations can be performed with accuracy and skill at a level that gives some room for error.

Surface demonstrations leave little room for error.
Chuck Ellsworth is offline  
Old 9th May 2014, 17:36
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
200 feet. Did this apply to Ramstein 1988?
barit1 is offline  
Old 9th May 2014, 18:05
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
200 feet. Did this apply to Ramstein 1988?
I don't know.

I did not start flying in the airshow circuit in Europe until 1997 and the 200 foot floor rule was in force then.

I flew for the French Flying Legends and flew in the first airshow in Munich in 1998 that was held after that crash closed air shows in Germany.

https://www.google.ca/search?q=frenc...w=1366&bih=587

Last edited by Chuck Ellsworth; 9th May 2014 at 18:27.
Chuck Ellsworth is offline  
Old 24th May 2014, 19:45
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very cool Chuck. What kind of aircraft did you fly for the Legends and what sort of maneuvers did you do with the type you flew?

Must have been fun.

What type?
JammedStab is offline  
Old 26th May 2014, 12:47
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know that you flew the Canso in Europe, was that your airshow machine?
JammedStab is offline  
Old 26th May 2014, 17:40
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know that you flew the Canso in Europe, was that your airshow machine?
You must be a Canadian? because only a Canadian would call a PBY a Canso.

If you are asking what aerobatic airplanes I flew the answer is the Pitts S2B and the Super Decathlon.
Chuck Ellsworth is offline  
Old 26th May 2014, 20:13
  #34 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
200 feet. Did this apply to Ramstein 1988?
Although the trigger event for the accident was inadequate and constrained vertical separation between 2 formation elements, the key factor in the high death toll was the energy vector being towards the crowd line. A correctly enforced deck might have avoided the mid-air, but air shows now (mostly!) prohibit energy vectors that will take the aircraft towards the crowd following a mishap.
Two's in is offline  
Old 27th May 2014, 07:09
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Scotland
Age: 80
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The older I get the better I used to be.
bcgallacher is offline  
Old 30th May 2014, 11:36
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ormond Beach
Age: 49
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ain't THAT the truth!
flyboyike is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2014, 21:35
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sometimes I wonder about the questions asked here, reading Jammed Stab's questions I am curious as to what he / she gathered from my answering the questions.

Apparently he / she knew I flew the PBY in European airshows and wanted to know what else I flew.

So now that I have answered the question Jammed Stab, which do you think is the most difficult to fly in a airshow, the PBY, the Pitts Special or the Super Decathlon?
Chuck Ellsworth is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2014, 23:06
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,165
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
This accident has really got me to thinking about why these accidents keep happening over and over and to some of the best pilots in aviation.
So after much soul searching I am going to try and explain what I think is the core reason they happen.
.......
There is no real clear answer, however with regard to air show accidents there are several factors which do definitely add to the risk that can be changed.
........
Being the best in the world is not everything because once gone the crowd soon forgets who you were.
Chuck, perhaps a subject for another, general thread?
djpil is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2014, 23:37
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chuck, perhaps a subject for another, general thread?
You mean a new thread to discuss how airshow safety can be improved?
Chuck Ellsworth is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2014, 02:40
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,165
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Yes, just a suggestion as I would expect a thread on that topic to attract more contributions and your post seems to be ideal to kick it off.
djpil is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.