![]() |
Originally Posted by Biggus
(Post 12064956)
True, but is it a realistic proposition, or a fig leaf (like hiding behind a taken down door under your stairs during a nuclear war) to give the illusion that there is some provision, and we won't simply abandon our shot down aircrew.
A Puma/Merlin/Chinook with a couple of accompanying troops who practice CSAR once or twice a year as a tertiary role is not the same as a dedicated, practised and fully supported CSAR unit. |
Yep, you can land on sand. Takeoff is a different story. When it takes near full power to taxi, the initial acceleration (if any) will be slow. I was grateful for the gap in the short trees at the other end. That was 4-up in a 172.
It could have been a very different story if the backup 130s got stuck. Edit: Good thing they had the 295s |
Originally Posted by Ninthace
(Post 12065040)
My son-in-law was a SERE instructor two tours ago - he could give you an informed answer I am sure, if it were not very hush-hush. I think you are badly under selling it and there are more ways of killing a cat than drowning it in cream.
|
Originally Posted by Bell_ringer
(Post 12064789)
Are there any accurate numbers to what this little exercise is costing the taxpayer?
It must be quite impressive by now. |
Very brave rescue people. Respect to all.
|
Originally Posted by West Coast
(Post 12065051)
The successful result is all I care about
|
Originally Posted by grizzled
(Post 12065055)
In your opinion, what would a successful result look like?
|
So it looks like the additional aircraft flown in weren't more C-130s. Logical if both the previous C-130s got bogged down. C-295W not Dash-8 though.
Ties in with post 4847: https://www.pprune.org/military-avia...l#post12064825 Details about the rescue op for the U.S. Weapon Systems Officer, via a U.S. military official: "The mountain top area on the left is where the WSO was hiding (he ejected 5ish miles northwest of there). The right area is the makeshift landing strip where they landed 2 C-130s and had 4 MH-6 Little Birds. "One Little Bird flew to that mountain top area and rescued the WSO and brought him back to the landing strip. And of course the two C-130s' nose gears got stuck in the dirt. So after a few hours they had to bring in three AFSOC Dash-8s to fly out the rescued WSO and the 100 or so personnel involved in the op." "The op basically cost $300 million because they had to abandon the two AFSOC C-130s and the four MH-6 Little Birds. Then the U.S. Air Force had to use multiple bombs to blow up all the aircraft they abandoned at that airstrip. And the Iranians shot down 2 MQ-9s Reaper drones. "Luckily the U.S. suffered no casualties and we had to use multiple bombs and missiles to blow up IRGC vehicles that tried to drive up the mountain and also those that tried to drive to the airstrip." |
Originally Posted by grizzled
(Post 12065055)
In your opinion, what would a successful result look like?
|
In the 24 hrs to 5 April around 15 to 18 ships have passed through the SofH. This marks the highest traffic since early March.
Of note is that a number of these vessels have been carrying Iranian oil meaning that Iran is now exporting more oil in money terms than before the conflict began. |
Some of you must remember Desert One from 1980...:ugh:
|
Originally Posted by Canary Boy
(Post 12065063)
Gosh, I had no idea we had so many SAR/CSAR experts in our midst (no finger pointing).
|
I find Tousi TV is always on the money👍
|
Originally Posted by orionsbelt
(Post 12064909)
langleybaston
A bit late but I have just read the marvellous news of the successful rescue. This is an amazing feat of arms. Surely no other nation in the world could have achieved it? My congratulations USA. Well said Sandy Operations of old, good job they still have the A10 the modern verson of the A-1H Skyraider. If those boys had been RAF or other Nato crew, could they have been rescued???? *** The RAF, nor NATO would have the spare tin to throw at this activity:
to recover a single service member who would otherwise need to tolerate board and lodging provided by Iran. Iran is not the Taliban, each captured crew member adds to the bargaining power of Iran, but each one harmed while in captivity is adverse to the case Iran appears to be making. The case being made? Iran is not Israel. This case is being made by Israel, much to my frustration. ROM, about 80+ troops were put in harms way, and fortunately no further lives were lost. Congress could reduce the risk of losses from the "no man left behind" policy by doing their job on kerning the actions of the wrecking ball that is the driver of this glorious excursion. |
Originally Posted by Bonkey
(Post 12065083)
"Saving Airman Ryan".....in cinemas near you from 2031 :)
In all seriousness though, a lot was asked from these men and women and they delivered under difficult circumstances. It probably deserves a film and a few documentaries. I would love to be a fly on the wall for the debrief. From the number of aircraft lost, whether shot down or scuttled, clearly there were some unexpected challenges. We may never know how close this came to being a failure, and thank goodness it wasn't. |
Originally Posted by Bell_ringer
(Post 12065092)
No chance - Tomcat down. Like the predecessor it will get an academy award for best sound editing.
In all seriousness though, a lot was asked from these men and women and they delivered under difficult circumstances. It probably deserves a film and a few documentaries. I would love to be a fly on the wall for the debrief. From the number of aircraft lost, whether shot down or scuttled, clearly there were some unexpected challenges. We may never know how close this came to being a failure, and thank goodness it wasn't. This is part of what being in the military gang is about. Certainly an expensive rescue but this crew's families will be forever grateful. |
All that was lost was kit. The military is structured in such a way that every part can be destroyed and replaced. So all that happened was the rescue team collapsed back to the rally point blowing up anything damaged as they went.
Think of it as returning the kit back to the tax payer. Besides it's all small beer compared to the economic disaster that's about to befall us. |
Very well done
Seriously good job on the Rescue!
Doubt many other (if any) Military would have been able to pull this off on their own. I imagine the IRGC will have been all over the place-desperate to get their hands on any US Service personnel. And yeah-would probably make a good film too! |
Originally Posted by Bell_ringer
(Post 12065092)
No chance - Tomcat down. Like the predecessor it will get an academy award for best sound editing.
In all seriousness though, a lot was asked from these men and women and they delivered under difficult circumstances. It probably deserves a film and a few documentaries. I would love to be a fly on the wall for the debrief. From the number of aircraft lost, whether shot down or scuttled, clearly there were some unexpected challenges. We may never know how close this came to being a failure, and thank goodness it wasn't. |
Good perspectives. Thank you.
Ships have been scuttled since the dawn of time, and when you’re burning up to $2B per day, ageing aircraft are small change when faced with the consequences of losing an airman to the enemy. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 05:52. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.