![]() |
Don't forget double full-stops. An IPT "Management Board" (17 staff, only 2 of them my senior and most non-technical) delayed approval for a high priority job for AFG for 6 weeks because I'd put a double full-stop at the end of a sentence in my technical spec. :ugh: That's 17 staff, out of a 39-strong IPT, MoD could do without. (Must check this before I send it tho')! |
I'd go a bit deeper than that, Wensleydale...
How about too many people talking a good job, and not enough people getting things done? After my little incident, I became a desk jonny. I was resonably well motivated & competent, but the work was piling on to me, they were whipping the willing horse. Simple prioritisation degenerated into a system of work avoidance. What could I do to postpone one job so that I could concentrate on a more important one. Bung an e mail back asking for more info? Job done. The IPT, almost without fail, issued STI's, RTI's & UTI's on a Friday. I suspect that the reason for this was that they spent all week having meetings, and had to make it someone else's problem by the weekend. . |
Thanks for that Wensleydale. I do hope your tongue was firmly in cheek.
The real moral of the story is MoD is chock full of over-promoted plonkers who have nothing better to do than fart about looking for such major howlers. The guy who spotted it prefaced his comments with "As I don't understand the technical spec...I suppose I better comment on something". In which case, why is he employed to scrutinise a technical spec? And why did I need to write a spec in the first place? Because the system doesn't allow DEC to specify a requirement; URDs are so woolly that, if contracted, the deliverable could meet the endorsed requirement but be incapable of being put to its intended use. In the example I quoted, the main issue was military personnel were dying due to lack of a solution. It is simply not acceptable for MoD to employ anyone, at any grade, who adopts the stance taken. Something I hope everyone here would agree with. |
Tuc,
Not just the MOD :ok: |
Great Event!
Congratulations to the organisers and participants at the Dinner last night. Excellent speeches and a wide spread of guests (including crewmen and engineers!) made it a truly memorable event.
Chinook rules OK. |
Originally Posted by KG86
(Post 6691643)
Congratulations to the organisers and participants at the Dinner last night. Excellent speeches and a wide spread of guests (including crewmen and engineers!) made it a truly memorable event.
Chinook rules OK. |
Celebrating SFFP's departure?
|
that might have needed Shackleton fins to be resurrected.
Did the Shackleton die for our sins? |
I actually replied to the right thread but, like a number of posters have reported, the reply appeared in a totally different one.
|
I do like a bit of irony
Moral of the story - have your work proof read by some-one else before you send it - that extra couple of hours can save you weeks. (The double full stop should have been picked up by a green wavy line in word. If not using word, then it is good practice to write in word first then cut and paste into other formats). (Must check this before I send it tho')! |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 16:54. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.