PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Will R.A.F Navigators be needed in the future? (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/274718-will-r-f-navigators-needed-future.html)

Futurnav 5th May 2007 15:18

Will R.A.F Navigators be needed in the future?
 
hey all

i have just the one question, im hoping to join the R.A.F as a Navigator, but will they actually be around for much longer on the tornados, Nimrods or any other aircraft they are on.

many thanks

Futurnav

TorqueOfTheDevil 5th May 2007 15:29

If you want to join the RAF as a Navigator, I'm afraid you have already missed the boat (aeroplane?), as the Nav brevet (along with all the other non-pilot ones) has already vanished. The various aircrew specialisations have now all been grouped under the heading WSO/WSOp, depending on whether the individual is commissioned or not.

That said, the job which Navs/WSOs do will probably be around for a while. I'll leave it to a FJ mate to update you on the expected out-of-service date for the Tornado GR (but I believe it's still some way off), but in the ME world the Nav job - if not name - will certainly be around for some time to come, as the Nimrod MRA4 will still have a Nav (albeit only one as opposed to the two which the MR2 carries). There will still be a few other Nav jobs for a little while longer (C-130K, VC-10), but you are right that it is a dying breed, with the rotary world already having turned its back on Navs, and the AD world in the process of doing so.

Have you considered applying for other non-pilot aircrew specialisations?

daze_gone_buy 5th May 2007 15:29

The biggest question is, were they ever needed? :E

Time to hide and ignore incoming.

Only joking,.........................

PredatorB 5th May 2007 15:29

Have you heard of a UCAV?......Coming your way soon.

Futurnav 5th May 2007 15:40

Current Navigators
 
Hey all

as you can see im posting alot of stuff about naviagtors, i was just wondering if there are any current r.a.f nav's on this forum if so would love to hear from you

many thanks

Futurnav

Pontius Navigator 5th May 2007 16:10

I believe there will be two nav streams. One on the GR4 until 2025 and the other in staff jobs where the pilots have left for civil aviation.:}

DaveO'Leary 5th May 2007 16:32

I heard the MoD have just purchased 2,000 TomTom Go 300s:ok:

charliegolf 5th May 2007 16:40

Dave,

Why on earth would they need 2000?:)

CG

enicalyth 5th May 2007 17:07

One for each of the three services and 1997 for civil servants to find the weekend cottages?

DaveO'Leary 5th May 2007 17:08

A probability study (2000) of the units gave a 3-8% failure rate of a-b precision variations to target. Now, this might not mean much driving from Blackpool to Bury, but who wants a mushroom cloud over Iraq when we wanted Iran?

Not forgetting the confusion this would cause to the F-18s (US pilots) when they encounter a roundabout on the talking map???? They might just keep circling looking for the turn off.:)

Pontius Navigator 5th May 2007 17:22

"Attention - Danger Zone - Slow Down - you are exceeding the speed limit"

Seldomfitforpurpose 5th May 2007 17:24

"One on the GR4 until 2025 and the other in staff jobs where the pilots have left for civil aviation"

And that ladies and gentlemen is why we are f@cked :ugh:

Seldomfitforpurpose 5th May 2007 17:28

Bit early chap as McD's is open till quite late on a bank holiday weekend, try after 23:00.....................:p

Zoom 5th May 2007 23:38

Navs are OK, I suppose, but that extra fuel instead would be so much more useful.

:ok:

L J R 6th May 2007 02:09

And don't forget the Oxygen required to sustain them, that takes room too you know.

Pontius Navigator 6th May 2007 06:57

Zoom, of course, quite right and very useful too






for when you get lost :}

or as a POW :(

Wensleydale 6th May 2007 13:38

The transition of Navigator to WSO is quite a shrewd move for the Air Force. They havn't got a clue as to how many Navs they will need in the future because of the delays into service of future projects. They also could not persuade people to be AEOps - imagining hearing in the careers office "you have a 90% chance of going to the far north of Scotland with little chance of a commission". Therefore, the new clumping of rear crew trades will give a few more carrots to future NCA while ensuring that there will be a pool of qualified people to plunder for "Navs" should the need arise. (I'll still wear my "N" badge though).

As to whether Navs are a waste of time..... Mrs Wensleydale went to school with a lad who became a Jaguar pilot. Sadly he ran into Cumulo-Granitus while at the OCU at Lossie in the early 1980s. Mum in Law sent us a copy of his orbituary from the local paper which stated that he always wanted to be a single seat fighter pilot because he didn't want to rely upon anybody else. 'nuf said. Its a bit like the DC10 that was turned the wrong way by ATC in Teneriffe and flew into the mountain while 2 pilots and an eng were discussing a minor snag. Its amazing what an extra pair of eyes and ears in the cockpit can do for you.

Impiger 6th May 2007 15:43

Ah 'Navigation' the second oldest profession!

:) :)

skiesfull 6th May 2007 15:56

2nd oldest profession?
Is that because you need a Nav. to find the oldest profession?

daze_gone_buy 6th May 2007 16:49

Talking of the oldest profession, did they not suffer from a very famous anagram of 'navigator'?

:\


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:13.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.