PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Nimrod UAV? (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/259797-nimrod-uav.html)

Mr Point 14th January 2007 04:30

Nimrod UAV?
 
How can we expect the press to report accurately on RAF equipment and capability when the new air force website can't manage it:ugh: :

http://www.raf.mod.uk/equipment/nimrodmr2.cfm

According to the site the Nimrod MR2 has a crew of 0, a top speed of 360kts and a ceiling of 44,000'. Things have changed a bit since I left the fleet!:rolleyes:

harrogate 14th January 2007 05:01

It's correct, actually. They just released the revised stats a bit early by accident. Should've been released post-budget.

'Crew: 0' refers to available trained crew after cuts.

The speed is now capped at 360 to save fuel costs. They're gonna be fitted with those 'LIMITED TO 360 - HOW'S MY FLYING?' stickers in due course too.

The new altitude is 44,000ft - air's thinner up there. See fuel saving policy.

Stingray weaponry refers to the 1960s sci-fi sub. Ever see them fcuk up? No. A few close shaves, but 100% track record and consdierably cheaper than other armament options.

So get your facts straight before you post next time.

clicker 14th January 2007 06:41

Nice to see the link to PPrune and E-Goat on the sites front page though. :ok:

stillin1 14th January 2007 08:06

Kinda sums up the current situation -
"Now which foot shall I get myself accidentally shot in"?:mad:
I continue to dispare:{ You would have thought that someone in the £1000 chairs would have thought of proof reading and editorial for correct facts:ugh:
My head hurts

S:( ee spinstallaeropfl's threadc too = it gets worse.

Talking Radalt 14th January 2007 10:46


Originally Posted by harrogate (Post 3067231)
Stingray weaponry refers to the 1960s sci-fi sub. Ever see them fcuk up? No. A few close shaves, but 100% track record and consdierably cheaper than other armament options.

And fewer strings attached.

Corneleus 14th January 2007 21:20

Can't wait for those stats to be regurgitated at OASC...:}

Hoop Stress 15th January 2007 06:10

Take one aging maritime jet witha crew of 12 to 14, add one camera system and what do you get? A manned UAV platform.

Yashin 9th January 2008 08:34

"Take one aging maritime jet witha crew of 12 to 14, add one camera system and what do you get? A manned UAV platform"

Take one ageing jet with a crew of 25, add anything that your desperate mind can think of and you have an E3

airborne_artist 9th January 2008 08:48

And how about http://www.raf.mod.uk/equipment/jaguar.cfm - headline says:

"Jaguar GR3/GR3A (no longer is service May 2007)"

so why bother listing it?

Bob Viking 9th January 2008 08:50

Stillin1
 
I'm not normally one to get worked up about spelling, but DISPARE?!
Come on man, you can do better than that!
BV:ugh:

ZH875 9th January 2008 09:07

We also appear to have a full complement of C-130J.

The RAF has a total of 25 C-130J C4/C5 aircraft. The C4 is almost the same size as the current C3 aircraft, but with a slightly shorter fuselage, while the C5 is the same size as the C1.

http://www.raf.mod.uk/equipment/herculesc4c5.cfm

also from the K page: "The fleet totals 50 aircraft and is a mixture of C1/C3 aircraft and the new C-130J aircraft, designated C4/C5."

Nice to see current info.


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:50.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.