PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Canada To Buy Up To 16 x P-8A (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/652037-canada-buy-up-16-x-p-8a.html)

RAFEngO74to09 27th Mar 2023 23:05

Canada To Buy Up To 16 x P-8A
 
Boeing announcement

News Releases (mediaroom.com)


India Four Two 27th Mar 2023 23:47


... we are committed to delivering 100% Industrial and Technical Benefits that will significantly grow Canada’s aerospace and defense industry.”
What does that mean? Are they going to build them in Canada?

PS We have a "defence" industry in Canada, eh? ;)

melmothtw 28th Mar 2023 07:48


Originally Posted by India Four Two (Post 11410038)
What does that mean? Are they going to build them in Canada?

PS We have a "defence" industry in Canada, eh? ;)

No, they're not going to establish a new production line in Canada for 16 jets.

BBadanov 28th Mar 2023 08:30


Originally Posted by melmothtw (Post 11410167)
No, they're not going to establish a new production line in Canada for 16 jets.

Correct, of course they're not.
What the "Canada’s aerospace and defense industry” refers to is Boeing Canada doing deeper maintenance, perhaps even intermediate line servicing as probably the RCAF no longer have the capability.

BBadanov 28th Mar 2023 08:38

If Canada were to obtain "up to 16 P-8As" - which I doubt, as they skimp on Defence spending - they would join the other 5-eyes Commonwealth countries: Australia 14 x P-8As, UK 9 x P-8As, and NZ 4 x P-8As. So it does make sense - numbers would be in doubt, probably 10?

Davef68 28th Mar 2023 09:18

So Canada and Boeing are friends again? Or needs must, as there is no real alternative to P-8?

melmothtw 28th Mar 2023 13:55


Originally Posted by Davef68 (Post 11410209)
So Canada and Boeing are friends again? Or needs must, as there is no real alternative to P-8?

I'm surprised the Kawasaki P-1 isn't getting a look-in in any of these competitions, to be honest, but with every other 5-Eyes ally operating/ordering it, it was perhaps the only logical choice for Canada also.

sandiego89 28th Mar 2023 15:17

Sounds more like the usual Canadian dithering, putting their toes in the water, sorta-committing....not-committing, see what we can get out of it with big-numbers, then finally decide to get a few....all while their planes fall out of the air.....

henra 28th Mar 2023 21:30


Originally Posted by melmothtw (Post 11410320)
I'm surprised the Kawasaki P-1 isn't getting a look-in in any of these competitions, to be honest, but with every other 5-Eyes ally operating/ordering it, it was perhaps the only logical choice for Canada also.

In Germany the P-1 was briefly in discussion but it seems even the manuals weren't yet available in English and it was considered to high of a risk from an overall Program perspective (set up Maintenance/Training/Support/continued development and everthing around it) while being technically indeed quite interesting.

Asturias56 29th Mar 2023 08:13


Originally Posted by sandiego89 (Post 11410353)
Sounds more like the usual Canadian dithering, putting their toes in the water, sorta-committing....not-committing, see what we can get out of it with big-numbers, then finally decide to get a few....all while their planes fall out of the air.....


sounds liek the Brits - start with a need, move it to an "aspiration", buy a few, defer or cancel some of those......................

SLXOwft 30th Jun 2023 11:40

The US State Department has now notified Congress of the potential sale. If they buy the full 16 that would be one more that the current CP-140s


WASHINGTON, June 27, 2023 - The State Department has made a determination approving a possible Foreign Military Sale to the Government of Canada of P-8A Aircraft and related equipment for an estimated cost of $5.9 billion. The Defense Security Cooperation Agency delivered the required certification notifying Congress of this possible sale today.

The Government of Canada has requested to buy up to sixteen (16) P-8A Patrol Aircraft (...)
https://www.dsca.mil/press-media/maj...-p-8a-aircraft

rattman 30th Jun 2023 11:51


Originally Posted by henra (Post 11410513)
In Germany the P-1 was briefly in discussion but it seems even the manuals weren't yet available in English and it was considered to high of a risk from an overall Program perspective (set up Maintenance/Training/Support/continued development and everthing around it) while being technically indeed quite interesting.

I believe that Japanese defence contractors / government dont have any flexibility. It came up with the possible purchase of Soryu class subs by Australia. A few examples I have seen mentioned, Japan wouldn't give details of specification and capabilities until the contract was signed. Japan was unwilling / unable to do anything locally. It even talk a substantial amount of negoiation to get even basic maintainence done in aus. They would change or adapt the subs they were as designed, Australian subs are mixed sex crews, japanes aren't they were unwilling to do any mods to account for mixed sex crews.

That attitude is changing as Japanese defence contractors get more experience, but it seems to be a real thing

Lonewolf_50 30th Jun 2023 11:52

On the bright side, the NATO interoperability bit is helped by this choice.
Grats to the Canadian forces, let's hope they get the whole.

As to "will the whole lot get picked up?" ...
... I was hoping the USAF would get the whole lot of F-22's but that buy got cut substantially.
I was hoping the USAF would get the original 180 or so C-17's ... but that buy got cut.
The B-2 IIRC was originally going to be substantially more than the 20 ish that got purchased.
The F-15X numbers have shrunk at least once.
And so on ...

tdracer 30th Jun 2023 16:53


Originally Posted by Lonewolf_50 (Post 11459392)
On the bright side, the NATO interoperability bit is helped by this choice.
Grats to the Canadian forces, let's hope they get the whole.

As to "will the whole lot get picked up?" ...
I was hoping the USAF would get the original 180 or so C-17's ... but that buy got cut.

Not to nit-pick, but the USAF actually bought more than the original 180 C-17s - over 220 in fact (although IIRC the rate was somewhat slower than originally planned).

chevvron 30th Jun 2023 20:09

You forget there are dozens of '737s on the Boeing lot just waiting for a buyer.

Video Mixdown 30th Jun 2023 20:50


Originally Posted by chevvron (Post 11459631)
You forget there are dozens of '737s on the Boeing lot just waiting for a buyer.

A P-8 is built as a P-8. It is not a modified commercial 737.

tdracer 30th Jun 2023 22:24


Originally Posted by Video Mixdown (Post 11459637)
A P-8 is built as a P-8. It is not a modified commercial 737.

Exactly - the P-8s come off a dedicated (ITAR Controlled) final assembly line.
Plus, the P-8 is based on the 737NG, not the MAX.

rigpiggy 30th Jun 2023 23:56

I would have preferred that it went to an rfp tender. could not 24 global 6500 with the swordfish MPA mod not have been built in canada?

Big Pistons Forever 1st Jul 2023 00:32

There are many reasons that the Global MPA is unsuited for Canada starting with the requirement to carry external stores. Nevertheless I am sure that is what the RCAF will, eventually, after a painfully drawn out process get. This is going to be just like the Buffalo replacement. Late, dramatically over budget, and not fit for purpose....

Sadly Canada has learned nothing from the disastrous Cyclone helicopter procurement.

BBadanov 1st Jul 2023 06:31

The RCAF order for the P-8A is logical and sensible. Poseidon operators include USN, RAAF, RNZAF and RAF - and some NATO allies.
Really - like JSF - the only show in town. The P-1 may be capable, if anyone can decipher the Japanese specs, but how interoperable?


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:34.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.