PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   F35 pilots - (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/649646-f35-pilots.html)

CAEBr 2nd Nov 2022 12:10

F35 pilots -
 
- rarer than rocking horse ****

news.sky.com/story/uk-has-more-f-35-fast-jets-than-pilots-to-fly-them-ben-wallace-admits-12735825

23 jets in the UK, more than 1 per pilot. Interesting that "the defence secretary described the situation as "quite a challenge", claiming that the deficit in pilots was also because the F-35 Lightning aircraft is new" What is his definition of new ?

Have China got more aircrew than we have?

(Mods, feel free to move to one of the other threads on F35 or training if you feel its more relevant)

​​​

Bob Viking 2nd Nov 2022 12:55

If only there were a solution.
 
Can someone tell me what would happen in industry if there were a critical shortage of highly skilled people in a key role?

You can give any answer you like as long as it doesn’t involve money. Because it’s not about the money.

BV

Saintsman 2nd Nov 2022 13:49


Originally Posted by Bob Viking (Post 11324237)
Can someone tell me what would happen in industry if there were a critical shortage of highly skilled people in a key role?

BV

They bring them in from abroad?

Bob Viking 2nd Nov 2022 13:54

Saintsman
 
Excellent answer. Maybe that’s the solution.

Perhaps the second part of my question should be what would happen in industry to prevent those highly qualified individuals that you already have from leaving?

The answer must still not involve money. Because money is not the answer.

BV

Bengo 2nd Nov 2022 13:55


Originally Posted by Bob Viking (Post 11324237)
Can someone tell me what would happen in industry if there were a critical shortage of highly skilled people in a key role?

You can give any answer you like as long as it doesn’t involve money. Because it’s not about the money.

BV

Industry would first attempt to poach someone else's experts and if unsuccessful, then try with the inexpert. Finally they would make an attempt to find an alternative which did not need the experts.

N

Bob Viking 2nd Nov 2022 13:57

Bengo
 
Another excellent answer but poaching sounds awfully expensive. That sounds suspiciously like you are suggesting that money is the answer. But that can’t be right. Because we have been repeatedly told that money is not the answer.

I’m so confused.

BV

Herod 2nd Nov 2022 14:19

I flew the C-130 back in the early seventies. I volunteer. It can't be that hard....can it? :rolleyes:. That doesn't involve money, Bob; I'll do it for free.

roll_over 2nd Nov 2022 14:43

What is the salary of a fast jet pilot?

GeeRam 2nd Nov 2022 14:52


Originally Posted by Bengo (Post 11324270)
Industry would first attempt to poach someone else's experts and if unsuccessful, then try with the inexpert. Finally they would make an attempt to find an alternative which did not need the experts.

N

This is so true.


GeeRam 2nd Nov 2022 14:55


Originally Posted by Bengo (Post 11324270)
Industry would first attempt to poach someone else's experts and if unsuccessful, then try with the inexpert. Finally they would make an attempt to find an alternative which did not need the experts.

N


Originally Posted by Bob Viking (Post 11324273)
Another excellent answer but poaching sounds awfully expensive. That sounds suspiciously like you are suggesting that money is the answer. But that can’t be right. Because we have been repeatedly told that money is not the answer.

I’m so confused.

BV

Poaching is awfully expensive, which is why, although that's the first route, the bean counters demands on the purse strings usually means 9 times out of 10, that the poaching option falls at the first hurdle.....and thus the move to Option 2 begins.....

ACW599 2nd Nov 2022 15:09


Originally Posted by Bengo (Post 11324270)
Industry would first attempt to poach someone else's experts and if unsuccessful, then try with the inexpert. Finally they would make an attempt to find an alternative which did not need the experts

No, no. That's such a twentieth-century solution. You get the marketing department to produce a lavishly illustrated brochure showing how lean 'n' mean your organisation is and explaining why the number of pilots you have has been carefully optimised by world-class experts to be a perfect match to the number of airframes. In passing the brochure greenwashes the very low carbon footprint of the airframes, claims that they only use biomass-derived non-fossil fuel and can be fully recycled at the end of their lives. And so on and so forth ad nauseam.

Mogwi 2nd Nov 2022 15:13

I could get some hovering practice in with the Tiger Moth with today’s wind!

Mog

teeonefixer 2nd Nov 2022 15:38


Originally Posted by Bengo (Post 11324270)
Industry would first attempt to poach someone else's experts and if unsuccessful, then try with the inexpert. Finally they would make an attempt to find an alternative which did not need the experts.

N

In my experience, the number1 option is to subcontract out - the best results come from organisations which employ our former colleagues! Those that don't take a lot of additional recovery work.

Timelord 2nd Nov 2022 16:12

From what I hear, if it’s not about money, it’s about quality of life. Pilots (aircrew) have lost their status, their admin and support. Getting their leave allocation is rare as is time at home. They are submerged by trivia to such an extent that they have to regularly work 12 plus hour days despite only flying 6-10 hours a month. The pilots I know would forgo a pay rise if some of the QOL issues could be fixed.

RAFEngO74to09 2nd Nov 2022 16:32

UK Defence Secretary > HCDC just now - 33 F-35B pilots for 27 aircraft (including 3 x foreign - 1 x USAF / 1 x USMC / 1 x RAAF).

Only 13 of these are on the 12-aircraft front-line squadron (617 Sqn).

My comment: This of course is not only way below required NATO standards but insufficient for 24 hour ops + flying supervision.

On F-35B deliveries, it will take until 2025 to get 48 and "end of the decade" to get 74 [my comment: by comparison, RAAF will have all its 72 x F-35A by 2023].

On training pipeline:

Pilots holding for Valley AFT going backwards - now 51 vs 38 when CAS told 3 years ago to sort it - 9 holding post AFT for OCU - pilot entry hold down from 120 3 years ago > 25 now.

HCDC wants to see CAS ASAP.


Parliamentlive.tv - Defence Committee

Bing 2nd Nov 2022 16:47


Originally Posted by Timelord (Post 11324353)
From what I hear, if it’s not about money, it’s about quality of life. Pilots (aircrew) have lost their status, their admin and support. Getting their leave allocation is rare as is time at home. They are submerged by trivia to such an extent that they have to regularly work 12 plus hour days despite only flying 6-10 hours a month. The pilots I know would forgo a pay rise if some of the QOL issues could be fixed.

But how do you fix the QOL issues without money? Which isn't the answer.

Timelord 2nd Nov 2022 17:04


Originally Posted by Bing (Post 11324367)
But how do you fix the QOL issues without money? Which isn't the answer.

Ban anyone in the admin branch from e mailing squadron aircrew?

charliegolf 2nd Nov 2022 17:09


Originally Posted by Bob Viking (Post 11324237)
Can someone tell me what would happen in industry if there were a critical shortage of highly skilled people in a key role?

You can give any answer you like as long as it doesn’t involve money. Because it’s not about the money.

BV

It is partly about money, because in the scenario you describe, industry would 'beat the problem to death with dollars'!

CG

Asturias56 2nd Nov 2022 17:15

careful folks - anyone from the Treasury reading this thread will think the obvious answer is to scrap the excess airframes....................

alfred_the_great 2nd Nov 2022 17:18

Of course an interesting question might be the relative ratio of pilots:aircraft between different fleets.

are, for example, young pilots being allocated on an equitable basis between F35 and Typhoon?


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:57.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.