F35 pilots -
- rarer than rocking horse ****
news.sky.com/story/uk-has-more-f-35-fast-jets-than-pilots-to-fly-them-ben-wallace-admits-12735825 23 jets in the UK, more than 1 per pilot. Interesting that "the defence secretary described the situation as "quite a challenge", claiming that the deficit in pilots was also because the F-35 Lightning aircraft is new" What is his definition of new ? Have China got more aircrew than we have? (Mods, feel free to move to one of the other threads on F35 or training if you feel its more relevant) |
If only there were a solution.
Can someone tell me what would happen in industry if there were a critical shortage of highly skilled people in a key role?
You can give any answer you like as long as it doesn’t involve money. Because it’s not about the money. BV |
Originally Posted by Bob Viking
(Post 11324237)
Can someone tell me what would happen in industry if there were a critical shortage of highly skilled people in a key role?
BV |
Saintsman
Excellent answer. Maybe that’s the solution.
Perhaps the second part of my question should be what would happen in industry to prevent those highly qualified individuals that you already have from leaving? The answer must still not involve money. Because money is not the answer. BV |
Originally Posted by Bob Viking
(Post 11324237)
Can someone tell me what would happen in industry if there were a critical shortage of highly skilled people in a key role?
You can give any answer you like as long as it doesn’t involve money. Because it’s not about the money. BV N |
Bengo
Another excellent answer but poaching sounds awfully expensive. That sounds suspiciously like you are suggesting that money is the answer. But that can’t be right. Because we have been repeatedly told that money is not the answer.
I’m so confused. BV |
I flew the C-130 back in the early seventies. I volunteer. It can't be that hard....can it? :rolleyes:. That doesn't involve money, Bob; I'll do it for free.
|
What is the salary of a fast jet pilot?
|
Originally Posted by Bengo
(Post 11324270)
Industry would first attempt to poach someone else's experts and if unsuccessful, then try with the inexpert. Finally they would make an attempt to find an alternative which did not need the experts.
N |
Originally Posted by Bengo
(Post 11324270)
Industry would first attempt to poach someone else's experts and if unsuccessful, then try with the inexpert. Finally they would make an attempt to find an alternative which did not need the experts.
N
Originally Posted by Bob Viking
(Post 11324273)
Another excellent answer but poaching sounds awfully expensive. That sounds suspiciously like you are suggesting that money is the answer. But that can’t be right. Because we have been repeatedly told that money is not the answer.
I’m so confused. BV |
Originally Posted by Bengo
(Post 11324270)
Industry would first attempt to poach someone else's experts and if unsuccessful, then try with the inexpert. Finally they would make an attempt to find an alternative which did not need the experts
|
I could get some hovering practice in with the Tiger Moth with today’s wind!
Mog |
Originally Posted by Bengo
(Post 11324270)
Industry would first attempt to poach someone else's experts and if unsuccessful, then try with the inexpert. Finally they would make an attempt to find an alternative which did not need the experts.
N |
From what I hear, if it’s not about money, it’s about quality of life. Pilots (aircrew) have lost their status, their admin and support. Getting their leave allocation is rare as is time at home. They are submerged by trivia to such an extent that they have to regularly work 12 plus hour days despite only flying 6-10 hours a month. The pilots I know would forgo a pay rise if some of the QOL issues could be fixed.
|
UK Defence Secretary > HCDC just now - 33 F-35B pilots for 27 aircraft (including 3 x foreign - 1 x USAF / 1 x USMC / 1 x RAAF).
Only 13 of these are on the 12-aircraft front-line squadron (617 Sqn). My comment: This of course is not only way below required NATO standards but insufficient for 24 hour ops + flying supervision. On F-35B deliveries, it will take until 2025 to get 48 and "end of the decade" to get 74 [my comment: by comparison, RAAF will have all its 72 x F-35A by 2023]. On training pipeline: Pilots holding for Valley AFT going backwards - now 51 vs 38 when CAS told 3 years ago to sort it - 9 holding post AFT for OCU - pilot entry hold down from 120 3 years ago > 25 now. HCDC wants to see CAS ASAP. Parliamentlive.tv - Defence Committee |
Originally Posted by Timelord
(Post 11324353)
From what I hear, if it’s not about money, it’s about quality of life. Pilots (aircrew) have lost their status, their admin and support. Getting their leave allocation is rare as is time at home. They are submerged by trivia to such an extent that they have to regularly work 12 plus hour days despite only flying 6-10 hours a month. The pilots I know would forgo a pay rise if some of the QOL issues could be fixed.
|
Originally Posted by Bing
(Post 11324367)
But how do you fix the QOL issues without money? Which isn't the answer.
|
Originally Posted by Bob Viking
(Post 11324237)
Can someone tell me what would happen in industry if there were a critical shortage of highly skilled people in a key role?
You can give any answer you like as long as it doesn’t involve money. Because it’s not about the money. BV CG |
careful folks - anyone from the Treasury reading this thread will think the obvious answer is to scrap the excess airframes....................
|
Of course an interesting question might be the relative ratio of pilots:aircraft between different fleets.
are, for example, young pilots being allocated on an equitable basis between F35 and Typhoon? |
All times are GMT. The time now is 21:57. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.