PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Russian fighter crash at takeoff (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/648878-russian-fighter-crash-takeoff.html)

A0283 14th Sep 2022 06:35

Russian fighter crash at takeoff
 
https://www.nu.nl/295300/video/russi...p-de-krim.html

fdr 14th Sep 2022 08:15

Link doesn't seem to work, if this is the SU-24 SU-25 pairs takeoff and #2 has a bad day on the left turn out... originally I thought it may be a wake encounter, another look at the video suggests that he has had an engine failure on the LHS and done an impromptu VMCair demonstration. Some days need a reset button.

DaveReidUK 14th Sep 2022 10:56


Originally Posted by fdr (Post 11296575)
if this is the SU-24 pairs takeoff and #2 has a bad day on the left turn out

No, definitely a pair of Frogfeet.

NickB 14th Sep 2022 11:31

Video works for me.

I've read elsewhere their wing tips collide, causing the crash, but having watched the video over and over they seem a fair distance apart, certainly far apart enough not to have collided.

Not sure why the pilot didn't bang out, unless he tried but the seat malfunctioned?


treadigraph 14th Sep 2022 11:48

No2 well behind the lead aircraft. Sorry about the inane commentary...


Recc 14th Sep 2022 11:50


Originally Posted by NickB (Post 11296664)
Video works for me.

I've read elsewhere their wing tips collide, causing the crash, but having watched the video over and over they seem a fair distance apart, certainly far apart enough not to have collided.

Not sure why the pilot didn't bang out, unless he tried but the seat malfunctioned?

If you look closely you can (I think) see an ejection at around 20s in the above video [EDIT: the original, not the slightly lower quality youtube link]. Obviously far too late at that point....

Beamr 14th Sep 2022 11:51


Originally Posted by fdr (Post 11296575)
Link doesn't seem to work, if this is the SU-24 pairs takeoff and #2 has a bad day on the left turn out... originally I thought it may be a wake encounter, another look at the video suggests that he has had an engine failure on the LHS and done an impromptu VMCair demonstration. Some days need a reset button.

I believe I know the video you refer to and this is the same video, posted earlier in the Ukraine thread. And it is a SU25.

Less Hair 14th Sep 2022 12:16

Do they need a prior permit to eject?
I know for a fact that during the Cold War some eastern air force pilots did need one. Some commanding officers were western COMINT monitored, preferring to let some of their men crash. Not individual cases.

uxb99 14th Sep 2022 12:28


Originally Posted by Less Hair (Post 11296690)
Do they need a prior permit to eject?
I know for a fact that during the Cold War some eastern air force pilots did need one. Some commanding officers were western COMINT monitored, preferring to let some of their men crash. Not individual cases.

Surely that's a joke? Given the choice of dead or no permit I'll take the rap for no permit.

As to why the pilot didn't eject sooner. By the time the pilot realises it's probably too late. Do these aircraft have zero zero ejection seats?

Is this accident the fault of the leader? Shouldn't he be grabbing some speed, altitude just in case?

Less Hair 14th Sep 2022 12:29

Not a joke. I cannot share more details.

NickB 14th Sep 2022 12:47


Originally Posted by Recc (Post 11296674)
If you look closely you can (I think) see an ejection at around 20s in the above video [EDIT: the original, not the slightly lower quality youtube link]. Obviously far too late at that point....

I've looked again, but cannot see any signs of ejection? He rolls to port and turns completely inverted before going in.
Perhaps he realised it was too late to attempt getting out?
I've never heard about permission to eject before - sounds completely insane! A rule made by General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay Melchett perchance?!! Bahhhhh!!

Recc 14th Sep 2022 13:08


Originally Posted by NickB (Post 11296708)
I've looked again, but cannot see any signs of ejection?

You can see a white flash around the cockpit area briefly at the 20s mark. Very similar (though less obvious) to the video of the Ukrainian SU-25 shootdown/ crash earlier in the war. It could have been a reflection, but seems unlikely given the cloud cover.
Earlier incident: https://theaviationist.com/2022/03/1...shing-ukraine/

NickB 14th Sep 2022 13:22


Originally Posted by Recc (Post 11296713)
You can see a white flash around the cockpit area briefly at the 20s mark. Very similar (though less obvious) to the video of the Ukrainian SU-25 shootdown/ crash earlier in the war. It could have been a reflection, but seems unlikely given the cloud cover.
Earlier incident: https://theaviationist.com/2022/03/1...shing-ukraine/

I've looked again and there might be something, but indistinct.

One wonders if the Ruskies are low on experienced aircrew, hence the lack of ejection - all conjecture, I know.

fdr 14th Sep 2022 14:39


Originally Posted by DaveReidUK (Post 11296652)
No, definitely a pair of Frogfeet.

D'oh, gotta put on my glasses or get a braille key board. 25... not 24. There was one for sale in the USA some time back, pre moratorium.

Less Hair 14th Sep 2022 14:44

A poor man's A-10.

Martin the Martian 14th Sep 2022 15:13


Originally Posted by Less Hair (Post 11296754)
A poor man's A-10.

Actually, a very good ground attack aircraft capable of carrying a large amount of ordnance and able to soak up a lot of punishment, as some images posted online in recent months will testify.

It's not a poor man's anything.

luckyrat 14th Sep 2022 19:42

Speaking of chits to leave or not leave an aircraft you have just signed for!
Those in charge in the UK at the start of WW1, forbid RFC pilots from wearing parachutes in case they decided to leave a perfectly serviceable aeroplane during combat!
So maybe things don’t change?

Anyroder, a fellow aviator just died. He probably didn’t know why someone had just sanctioned his mission?

common toad 14th Sep 2022 19:54


Those in charge in the UK at the start of WW1, forbid RFC pilots from wearing parachutes in case they decided to leave a perfectly serviceable aeroplane during combat!
Don’t let the facts get in the way of a bar story. There were no suitable parachutes availed at the start of WW 1.

luckyrat 14th Sep 2022 20:18


Originally Posted by common toad (Post 11296868)
Don’t let the facts get in the way of a bar story. There were no suitable parachutes availed at the start of WW 1.

After over 18,000 flight hours, some times arriving home with less aircraft than I took off with, I assure you if all I had was a knotted handkerchief, and my arse was on fire 🔥 I would have jumped…….🙀

pr00ne 14th Sep 2022 21:31


Originally Posted by common toad (Post 11296868)
Don’t let the facts get in the way of a bar story. There were no suitable parachutes availed at the start of WW 1.

What about the hundreds of observation balloon observers who escaped from burning or deflating balloons BY PARACHUTE.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:51.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.