Originally Posted by N707ZS
(Post 11201815)
Is anything known about the owners of AceHawk AerospaceLtd other than the details listed on company house.
https://acehawkaerospace.com/?page_id=47 and the menus ….as someone said here the website is basic so that a kindergarten pupil could do it themselves https://acehawkaerospace.com/?page_id=78 IT is not enticing |
To be honest, not sure why they need a website - not sure programs of this magnitude depend on how much money is spent on a website! Slightly troubling that some think it should.......but that's Pprune for you ;-) I see that they are attending Global Defence Helicopters in Warsaw so you can go and ask them for yourself. Maybe they've decided to spend website expenditure on meeting prospective clients?
|
Originally Posted by EESDL
(Post 11204241)
To be honest, not sure why they need a website - not sure programs of this magnitude depend on how much money is spent on a website! Slightly troubling that some think it should.......but that's Pprune for you ;-) I see that they are attending Global Defence Helicopters in Warsaw so you can go and ask them for yourself. Maybe they've decided to spend website expenditure on meeting prospective clients?
|
Originally Posted by trim it out
(Post 11204264)
Fair one. Perhaps Ascent should have spent their website budget on a proper MPS from the start too.
|
Originally Posted by pba_target
(Post 11204410)
Their website is very shiny, lots of glossy photos of succeeding students.... Are they at least providing a decent MPS now?
https://ascentflighttraining.com/new...em-for-ukmfts/ |
There has always been a Goldilocks and the Three bears feeling about the attempts to sell the UK the Blackhawk in the past - Wessex replacement - it's too small, so we bought the Merlin; Lynx replacement, too big, so we got the Lynx mk 10, sorry, Wildcat. Maybe the Puma/Griffon/212/Dauphin one will be the time it's just right?
|
Just a thought about Pumas filling the gap between Griffins and NMH. How suitable is the HC.2 for overwater SAR, inasmuch as they do not have winches or flotation gear and how current are the crews in that type of ops?
|
Originally Posted by Martin the Martian
(Post 11204593)
Just a thought about Pumas filling the gap between Griffins and NMH. How suitable is the HC.2 for overwater SAR, inasmuch as they do not have winches or flotation gear and how current are the crews in that type of ops?
|
Originally Posted by Davef68
(Post 11204540)
There has always been a Goldilocks and the Three bears feeling about the attempts to sell the UK the Blackhawk in the past - Wessex replacement - it's too small, so we bought the Merlin; Lynx replacement, too big, so we got the Lynx mk 10, sorry, Wildcat. Maybe the Puma/Griffon/212/Dauphin one will be the time it's just right?
|
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....45590ec00c.jpg
So they've finally admitted it ;-) "Chinese" whispers? |
Well, if anyone here is likely to know, it’s you chap!
|
Originally Posted by melmothtw
(Post 11204760)
Too big, or too big for the RAF to allow the Army to operate it?
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:35. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.