It's official - Germany buys F-35 for Nuclear Role
Hi,
Haven't seen it mentioned yet. Today it was offically confirmed by the Defense Secretary as well as the Chief of the German Air Force that for the Nuclear Role 35 F-35A will be purchased as successor to the ageing Tornado Aircraft https://www.reuters.com/world/europe...ce-2022-03-14/ Ahh, btw. honourable mention goes to Vladimir Putin. Probably wouldn't have happened without his tremendous support... regards Henra |
This would have happened without Putin as well, talks were underway well before Putin's invasion of the Ukraine. https://www.aerotime.aero/articles/3...-united-states
The F-35 was ruled out from the beginning by the previous coalition (Merkel's party being the stronger coalition partner, Scholz's party the weaker) in order not to jeopardize the FCAS program by upsetting France, with the new coalition the focus shifted to a "European solution", i.e. not only buying from the US. Instead of 15 EA-18G and 30 F/A-18F (obviously all American) the new order will be for 35 F-35A (maybe to be built in Italy?) and 15 Typhoon ECR, the latter to be developed and built in Germany. |
I wonder how well understood among the British public, media and political parties, this is? That Germany has a nuclear strike role. Albeit through the shared nuclear defence programme alongside Belgium and the Netherlands. And maintained by the USAF of course.
FB |
I presume these 15 x EW versions of the Typhoon they will be developing will be new build two-seater's....?
|
They call it Eurofighter not Typhoon and the F-35 special weapons are US owned under permanent US guard and only released by order of the US President. Exact the same procedures like in other NATO countries.
|
Originally Posted by GeeRam
(Post 11200098)
I presume these 15 x EW versions of the Typhoon they will be developing will be new build two-seater's....?
|
Originally Posted by Less Hair
(Post 11200100)
They call it Eurofighter not Typhoon and the F-35 special weapons are US owned under permanent US guard and only released by order of the US President. Exact the same procedures like in other NATO countries.
I remember american cockpit colleagues not believing that - for them it was unthinkable. But they were airline pilots, like me in a Gulf company. |
Originally Posted by GeeRam
(Post 11200098)
I presume these 15 x EW versions of the Typhoon they will be developing will be new build two-seater's....?
|
Originally Posted by Finningley Boy
(Post 11199966)
I wonder how well understood among the British public, media and political parties, this is? That Germany has a nuclear strike role. Albeit through the shared nuclear defence programme alongside Belgium and the Netherlands. And maintained by the USAF of course.
FB |
Originally Posted by golder
(Post 11200577)
Germany with a nuke bomb. What could go wrong?
Nuclear sharing in Germany exists since 1960. It requires two- factor authorisation: By the US having the code for the Bombs + the GAF by transporting the bombs to the target. |
What is still unclear is if there will be another 40 EF/Typhoon to replace the remaining Tornados. At the moment there are still ~90 Tornados in service and yesterday's announcement only included 50 Aircraft. The Luftwaffe has its Tornado replacement requirement for 85 aircraft to replace the current 90 Tornados, but also has an electronic attack requirement for NATO named Luftgestützte Wirkung im Elektromagnetischen Spektrum (luWES). It is not clear if the 35 F-35As and 15 Eurofighter ECRs announced on Monday are all for the Tornado replacement, in which case we can expect an announcement for another 35 Eurofighter Tranche 5s, or if the 15 ECRs are for luWES, in which case we can expect an announcement for another 50 Eurofighter Tranche 5s. The previous German government said it was to get 55 Eurofighter Tranche 5s and 30 Super Hornets for the Tornado replacement, along with 15 Growlers for luWES, which suggests we can expect 50 more Eurofighter Tranche 5s. |
ILA Berlin 2018
Glad I kept my swag from the show as you got a free cap for sitting in the F-35A mock up.
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....80b396955.jpeg it was kind of a given (in spite of Berlin dismissing it a year later) the 35A would be picked re NATO nuclear shared commitment plus N SA removes the Super Hornet as a Bucket of Sunshine carrier. https://fas.org/blogs/security/2021/...om-fact-sheet/ German neighbors do or will have the 35 Belgian Air Component RNethAF RDAF Polish Air Force Swiss Armee cheers |
Sale of F-35A + associated weapons to Germany approved by DSCA.
Germany – F-35 Aircraft and Munitions | Defense Security Cooperation Agency (dsca.mil) |
Originally Posted by JeanKhul
(Post 11200248)
Except France of course, contrary to common belief.
I remember american cockpit colleagues not believing that - for them it was unthinkable. But they were airline pilots, like me in a Gulf company. |
Originally Posted by RAFEngO74to09
(Post 11269526)
Sale of F-35A + associated weapons to Germany approved by DSCA.
Germany – F-35 Aircraft and Munitions | Defense Security Cooperation Agency (dsca.mil) |
Of all the F-35 customers it annoys me that we continue with the Jump Jet obsession and to our detriment. I can see the B only show in town for our particular design of aircraft carriers, but for the RAF, jeeze.
FB |
Originally Posted by sandiego89
(Post 11271239)
Quite a mix of air-to-air, precision air to ground, dumb bombs and training rounds in that list- seems they will use the F-35 for a whole host of mission profiles. Imagine they will have a training unit in the USA.
|
Originally Posted by etudiant
(Post 11271464)
Given how unsafe the air space is above Ukraine, is the idea of such close air support still viable?
|
Originally Posted by etudiant
(Post 11271464)
Given how unsafe the air space is above Ukraine, is the idea of such close air support still viable?
The Close does not mean "close to the ground" as much as it means "close to own troops" (where the things that go boom arrive). Being a good FAC remains as much art as it does science. While I am at it, let's give a big round of applause for all of those FACs. (I'll admit a bias to this next bit, given my rotary wing instincts) If you want CAS to show up in a 'close to the ground' mode, there are attack helicopters who can fulfill that role. It doesn't have to be an A-10. (Although they are great at what they do). In a word, the answer to your exam question Q: Is close air support still viable? A: Yes. (But it's not easy) |
Originally Posted by Lonewolf_50
(Post 11271998)
I've seen close air support missions flow from altitudes that require 02 masks. PGM's allow that. You may want to re-evaluate what you think Close Air Support is.
The Close does not mean "close to the ground" as much as it means "close to own troops" (where the things that go boom arrive). Being a good FAC remains as much art as it does science. While I am at it, let's give a big round of applause for all of those FACs. (I'll admit a bias to this next bit, given my rotary wing instincts) If you want CAS to show up in a 'close to the ground' mode, there are attack helicopters who can fulfill that role. It doesn't have to be an A-10. (Although they are great at what they do). In a word, the answer to you exam question Q: Is close air support still viable? A: Yes. (But it's not easy) |
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:42. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.