So, the obvious solution to the problem is to use female fighter pilots?
|
Originally Posted by Ascend Charlie
(Post 11132770)
So, the obvious solution to the problem is to use female fighter pilots?
|
Unfortunately this result is no surprise if your sit next to some very strong microwave emitters for a living.
In Germany we had some similar debate with military ground radar observers that ended up with specific lower body cancers sitting next to radar displays with strong radiation. |
Originally Posted by meleagertoo
(Post 11132734)
I wonder...
Is the incidence of testicular cancer somehow related to the self-percieved size of the testicles? And prostrate troubles due perhaps (!) to the excess flatulence their career path seems to produce? just saying |
Given that well over 50% of all men will have some form of prostate cancer during their lifetimes, if this study is correct the odds for fighter pilots must be crazy high.
|
Salute!
Given that 99.9% of all males that have eaten brocolli have died, I would take my chances flying the Hun and avoid that green veggie. From personal experience, I can guarantee that the last thing I was worried about when gettin shot at on a regular basis was having prostsate cancer or lung cancer. I still managed to ruin my lungs from smoking, and likely inhaling toxic fumes on the flight line, but not cancer...just loss of function. As with the gorebull warming studies, last line is always we need $$ for another study. Hmmmmm.... Gums sends... |
Originally Posted by NutLoose
(Post 11132586)
You don't thing its anything to do with the amount of radium used on the dials of your big firke orf watches? |
Most have told me that they need both hands!
|
If I'd known about this beforehand, I certainly would have avoided flying fighters and gone into something safer like accounting or lapidary.
Having a number of hours in three of the machines in the study, I guess I'm as good as dead..... .....although at my age I'm not planning anything particularly long term anyway. You know, except for a very small range-only radar for gun lead computations, the F-100 didn't even have a real 'radar'. Unlike the F-105 or F-4 which did. The radar layout in the 727 had the real potential to 'fry' something fleshy. It had a radar dish right in front of the pilots that continuously rotated 360 degrees, with a cutout switch to terminate the radiation while pointed at the cockpit and another switch to restart it again when pointed down range..... There was no indication to the pilots that the cutout was operating properly. :eek: |
If I remember correctly didn’t Concorde carry some equipment to monitor radiation at altitude and when it was retired I seem to remember something about it going into JCB’s Gulfstream.
|
Originally Posted by Mk 1
(Post 11133772)
Given ShyTorque's earlier suggestion I guess that means Fighter jocks are left handed?
Off topic but watched the Red Bull through the tunnel film and he was wearing a Hamilton watch that detaches then clips to the panel, clever item. https://www.ablogtowatch.com/hamilto...edition-watch/ See 10 seconds in |
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:34. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.