PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Target Designation In The Falklands (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/641969-target-designation-falklands.html)

downsizer 9th Aug 2021 07:32

Surely the real issue here is the guy at Cranwell must be walting right....? Designating targets in the FIs and now working as groundcrew...? C'mon, I don't buy it.

Video Mixdown 9th Aug 2021 07:57


Originally Posted by Bagheera S (Post 11092129)
I appreciate your reply, but the question was intended for a response from a person who was close to the actual operation in 82.

In the middle of a war you're going to hover at 5000' in clear view of the enemy? You don't need specialist knowledge to predict the likely consequences. If I were a member of your crew and you proposed such a plan I'd have clubbed you like a baby seal.

Bagheera S 9th Aug 2021 08:12


Originally Posted by Video Mixdown (Post 11092185)
In the middle of a war you're going to hover at 5000' in clear view of the enemy? You don't need specialist knowledge to predict the likely consequences. If I were a member of your crew and you proposed such a plan I'd have clubbed you like a baby seal.

Tis ashame you didn’t read the post, I said “outside the defended area” ie outside the Roland missile engagement zone…. They only go so far;- approx 5miles horizontally.

Looking the film and maps they were successfully designating targets (artillery)at 10 -12 miles from an elevation of about 1000ft.



ORAC 9th Aug 2021 09:13

You’d have to have supreme confidence in the intelligence on enemy ground weapon deployment in an era and area without satellite coverage or photo recce and analysis….

Davef68 9th Aug 2021 09:51


Originally Posted by Yellow Sun (Post 11091971)
A little known event occurred one weekend when a Nimrod was flown from Kinloss to Lossiemouth where an afternoon was spent trying LGBs for size in the bomb bay. There was no information forthcoming about how they might be used, in fact I somehow doubt that it had developed that far. However it was established that the stores could be carried so I suppose it could have become an “interesting’ option.

Presumably if they put a PaveSpike pod on the wing pylon it could self designate. From memory they also tried fittiing LGBs to the Vulcan, but were hampered by the fact that you could only fit three in the bomb bay

Yellow Sun 9th Aug 2021 12:22


Originally Posted by Davef68 (Post 11092249)
Presumably if they put a PaveSpike pod on the wing pylon it could self designate. From memory they also tried fittiing LGBs to the Vulcan, but were hampered by the fact that you could only fit three in the bomb bay

I would presume nothing. No information was made available at station level regarding how LGBs might be employed. Had I to guess, the aircraft role might have been similar to the part it usually played in a Vectac.

I don’t know what the outcome of the measuring up exercise was. We knew beforehand that they would fit, but how many and if a safe release was achievable was not a unit matter. In any event, there were many other things going on that fully occupied my time.

YS

itsnotthatbloodyhard 9th Aug 2021 22:50

The GBU-10s & 12s we used back in the day had a 4-digit code that was set on both the weapon and the designator. Did the kits used in the Falklands not have this, or if they did, how was it expected that the Harrier laser would work with them?


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:53.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.