PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   World's Most Secretive 737 (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/640941-worlds-most-secretive-737-a.html)

cavuman1 8th Jun 2021 13:09

World's Most Secretive 737
 
Rat 55, Radar Airborne Testbed, looks like a cross between the Super Guppy and Groucho Marx! When asked about the functions of the craft by a reporter, the chief pilot responded: "I will tell you. Then I will kill you!"

Make of this what you will. RAT 55

https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....6ec88eb603.jpg

- Ed

Less Hair 8th Jun 2021 13:38

At least it is wearing a mask.

Timelord 8th Jun 2021 13:54

Looks like leftover bits from AEW Nimrod!

ORAC 8th Jun 2021 14:15

Lots of strange aircraft around…. Catfish…


Krystal n chips 8th Jun 2021 14:21

I'm interested as to why its still got JT8 D's attached.

I'll get my engine course notes out and when I get the job, I'll let you know.

campbeex 8th Jun 2021 14:32

World's most secretive 737...

...that you know about.

ORAC 8th Jun 2021 14:42

KnC,

Because they don’t have to worry about fuel costs and, with plenty of spare parts and engines with 6 in storage at AMARC, what would be the point?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_T-43


DirtyProp 8th Jun 2021 16:17

Boeing disclosing the latest fix for the MCAS fiasco?

Krystal n chips 8th Jun 2021 16:19


Originally Posted by ORAC (Post 11058902)
KnC,

Because they don’t have to worry about fuel costs and, with plenty of spare parts and engines with 6 in storage at AMARC, what would be the point?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_T-43

Fair enough. I was just thinking as it's a -200 the airframe has been around for a few hours so why this combination, why not a -3 / 4 or 500. But it's a tried and tested combination as you say.

Piper_Driver 8th Jun 2021 16:45

Maybe they want old fashioned avionics that aren’t as susceptible to high levels of RF energy.

Almostfamous 8th Jun 2021 16:46

Area 51
 
I'd think the Janet 737s would be more secretive...

sandiego89 8th Jun 2021 16:54


Originally Posted by Krystal n chips (Post 11058933)
Fair enough. I was just thinking as it's a -200 the airframe has been around for a few hours so why this combination, why not a -3 / 4 or 500. But it's a tried and tested combination as you say.

Bet she has low total hours however, and not nearly the cycles and hard life of the clapped out 200's that I "enjoyed" as a passenger at Burbank on hot days.....brake check!!!!

Many of the military aircraft derived from passenger aircraft have surprisingly lower hours compared to their civil counterparts (by no means not all)

pamann 8th Jun 2021 17:04


Originally Posted by Almostfamous (Post 11058944)
I'd think the Janet 737s would be more secretive...

Thats exactly what I thought this thread was going to be about.

ShyTorque 8th Jun 2021 17:19

Maybe it's a secret plan to camouflage the "Max" and get it back into service.

FullWings 8th Jun 2021 20:17

If it’s got JT8s then they definitely didn’t tick the stealth option...

SASless 8th Jun 2021 23:37

Catfish.....looks more like an aircraft with an Irish Canard installed.

fitliker 9th Jun 2021 01:25

What about the Alien express ? the shuttle from Las Vegas to Groom lake .
Pretty sure a lot of the alien looking attendees at the Star Trek convention in Las Vegas flew in from Area 51 onboard the white 737 with the red stripe . Although one of my friends who used to commute on it just laughed when I asked if I could get a tour of the UFOs . He said even his accreditation and clearance did not let him tour the space ships .

tdracer 9th Jun 2021 03:32


Originally Posted by ORAC (Post 11058893)
Lots of strange aircraft around…. Catfish…

That's the very first 757 to fly (NA001) - it was modified for use as a flying testbed for F-22 flight software. Not sure where it is now, but for a long time it was parked down at the south end of Boeing Field (which is the airport it's landing at in the video) - I'd drive by it on a regular basis when I was working at Boeing Field.
Never heard it called the Catfish before though...


Maybe they want old fashioned avionics that aren’t as susceptible to high levels of RF energy.
That's a distinct possibility, given it's task. I know that was a big deal on the 747-200 based Air Force One aircraft - those old fashioned analog electronics made it a lot easier to get the EMI protection levels the USAF wanted.
Back maybe 15 years ago, Boeing had a contract to build a prototype E-10 aircraft based on a 767-400ER airframe. It was going to have a huge, powerful ground search radar hung under the forward fuselage (the longer 767-400 airframe being dictated by the size of the radar). That radar was direct line of sight with the engine FADECs, and interference with engine operation was a big concern. I got a call that went something like this:
"What level of HIRF can the CF6-80C2 FADEC handle?"
"We tested to 200 volts/meter, wide band, from x to y megahertz, it passed"
"Yea, but what can it handle?"
"Don't know, we didn't test to failure, we only tested to 200 volts/meter - that's what the FAA mandated - and it passed. What's the threat?"
"Can't tell you that - it's classified. How much can it handle?"
"Well, we'd have to test it again, but to be useful we'd need to know the threat so we know what to test for. The test isn't cheap, plus depending on the threat we may not be able to duplicate it in the lab."
"Oh, I'll get back to you."

About 3 months later that call would be repeated... Went on for over a year. Finally the program got cancelled.
That 767-400ER was the last one ever built - eventually it was equipped as a standard passenger 767 and delivered to a commercial customer...

dc9-32 9th Jun 2021 04:52

Area 51 does not exist.....

ORAC 9th Jun 2021 04:59

Tdracer,

Now operating out of Palmdale Plant 42.

Returning to the most secret 737 theme and RAT55

https://jalopnik.com/the-worlds-most...ost-1686479619

Then of course there’s…..


https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...y-modified-737

But we’ve been here before….

https://www.pprune.org/military-avia...00-n712jm.html




ORAC 9th Jun 2021 05:27

Tdracer,

Reference Catfish. there is also Catbird, CATB (Cooperative Avionics Test Bed). Catbird being Lockheed’s ICAO callsign. I presume Catfish was correspondingly used informally, as it’s the ICAO callsign of a UK company.

And of course because, because it’s the F-22 radar, ESM and other sensor testbed : “Scientists believe that catfish have whiskers, which are also called “barbels”, due to the fact that each one is loaded with tiny taste buds and special olfactory sensors to help them smell and feel the food around them when navigating in the dark.”……

https://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1267870/pg1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_CATBird



https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....87d7d7b4d.jpeg

Willard Whyte 9th Jun 2021 11:08

Hmm, CAT B...

"Body shell should be crushed. Signifies extensive damage, although some parts are salvageable.

Should never re-appear on road, although reclaimed parts can be used in other road-going vehicles."



ORAC 10th Jun 2021 05:27

Ipanema,

Wrong thread for that question - try the Tech Log forum.

antisthenes 10th Jun 2021 05:32

About 2500m

tartare 10th Jun 2021 07:59

Yes, I would have thought Janet would have been more secret.
Saw her take off from Vegas once - pretty sporty climb out and angle of bank too.

Less Hair 10th Jun 2021 08:00

The Janet aircraft are not secret. They are stock second hand 737-600.

Video Mixdown 10th Jun 2021 08:33


Originally Posted by Less Hair (Post 11059731)
The Janet aircraft are not secret. They are stock second hand 737-600.

That's what I was thinking. The work their passengers do is no doubt classified, but the aircraft are just transport.

chopper2004 10th Jun 2021 11:21

Heli Expo 2018 Vegas
 

Originally Posted by Video Mixdown (Post 11059750)
That's what I was thinking. The work their passengers do is no doubt classified, but the aircraft are just transport.

I was attending Heli Expo 2018 in Vegas and was on flightline at Convention center to see the departures. Come morning and afternoon, my attention was caught by pair of JANEt inbound to McCarran after their daily commute, so here are my photos below.


https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....592493344.jpeg
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....7f12ae62b.jpeg
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....5fcb51c96.jpeg
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....e5698e9fb.jpeg
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....3a4faefef.jpeg
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....135bbdd75.jpeg

switch_on_lofty 10th Jun 2021 14:28


Originally Posted by ipanema (Post 11059601)
I'm looking for someone with access to a 737MAX8 manual with the Performance graphs.- or Boeing's performance spec charts.

My specific interest is in the runway length required for takeoff at MTOW at sea level at ISA+15 with a 5-knot crosswind component (from the right, in case you needed that!).

Asking for a friend!

Thanks much in advance..

Ipanema.

Flap 25, 1013, other parameters as per above: TODR 2077m to 35' screen height.

Dunhovrin 10th Jun 2021 17:10


Originally Posted by tartare (Post 11059727)
Yes, I would have thought Janet would have been more secret.
Saw her take off from Vegas once - pretty sporty climb out and angle of bank too.

Yeah, this was only at A8, so I guess it wasn't very full.

https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....ac41309f5.jpeg

sandiego89 10th Jun 2021 17:19

Cant imagine the Janet transits are that long either, likely less than 20 minutes tarmac to tarmac, so they likely have a small fuel fraction as well.

My shortest jet leg was Kauai to Hono, with the MD-87 captain announcing a 16 minute travel time. First hostess came by literally tossing out small pull top POG juices, followed by second hostess about 90 seconds later with the trash bag.

Less Hair 10th Jun 2021 18:23

KLAS to KXTA is 76 NM.

tartare 11th Jun 2021 01:29


Originally Posted by Dunhovrin (Post 11059993)
Yeah, this was only at A8, so I guess it wasn't very full.

https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....ac41309f5.jpeg

Great shot.
Oh to know what those passengers do once they walk through the special turnstiles at the other end of the route!
Yes video mixdown - I get they're stock standard...

Cyberhacker 12th Jun 2021 07:04


Originally Posted by tdracer (Post 11059110)
That's a distinct possibility, given it's task. I know that was a big deal on the 747-200 based Air Force One aircraft - those old fashioned analog electronics made it a lot easier to get the EMI protection levels the USAF wanted.

A few years back, I was working on a bit of kits for JSF/F35 pilots...

The EMC spec was quite challenging... the levels at which it was required to survive were completely un-survivable by the human pilot it was supporting...

vegassun 13th Jun 2021 13:47

THE most secretive 737 is not mentioned on here.

chopper2004 13th Jun 2021 17:57


Originally Posted by vegassun (Post 11061381)
THE most secretive 737 is not mentioned on here.

???

Go on please share and is it operated by the Company or one of its modern day equivalent of Air America.

cheers

Spooky 2 13th Jun 2021 20:22


Originally Posted by chopper2004 (Post 11061469)
???

Go on please share and is it operated by the Company or one of its modern day equivalent of Air America.

cheers

This may be the 737 you are thinking about?
- No USAF Markings but apparently belongs to the USAF
- Flown by USAF crews in civilian attire
- N number is disguised and blocked
- Flown out of a civilian airport in California
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...y-modified-737

ORAC 13th Jun 2021 21:01

Spooky2,

You mean the one already talked about in post #20?

https://www.pprune.org/military-avia...l#post11059131

Spooky 2 13th Jun 2021 22:11

Sorry I missed that post. Same one.

chopper2004 22nd Nov 2023 21:51

Out to tender
 
JANET contract is up for grabs

https://aviationweek.com/defense-spa...janet-operator



cheers


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:43.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.