World's Most Secretive 737
Rat 55, Radar Airborne Testbed, looks like a cross between the Super Guppy and Groucho Marx! When asked about the functions of the craft by a reporter, the chief pilot responded: "I will tell you. Then I will kill you!"
Make of this what you will. RAT 55 https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....6ec88eb603.jpg - Ed |
At least it is wearing a mask.
|
Looks like leftover bits from AEW Nimrod!
|
Lots of strange aircraft around…. Catfish…
|
I'm interested as to why its still got JT8 D's attached.
I'll get my engine course notes out and when I get the job, I'll let you know. |
World's most secretive 737...
...that you know about. |
KnC,
Because they don’t have to worry about fuel costs and, with plenty of spare parts and engines with 6 in storage at AMARC, what would be the point? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_T-43 |
Boeing disclosing the latest fix for the MCAS fiasco?
|
Originally Posted by ORAC
(Post 11058902)
KnC,
Because they don’t have to worry about fuel costs and, with plenty of spare parts and engines with 6 in storage at AMARC, what would be the point? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_T-43 |
Maybe they want old fashioned avionics that aren’t as susceptible to high levels of RF energy.
|
Area 51
I'd think the Janet 737s would be more secretive...
|
Originally Posted by Krystal n chips
(Post 11058933)
Fair enough. I was just thinking as it's a -200 the airframe has been around for a few hours so why this combination, why not a -3 / 4 or 500. But it's a tried and tested combination as you say.
Many of the military aircraft derived from passenger aircraft have surprisingly lower hours compared to their civil counterparts (by no means not all) |
Originally Posted by Almostfamous
(Post 11058944)
I'd think the Janet 737s would be more secretive...
|
Maybe it's a secret plan to camouflage the "Max" and get it back into service.
|
If it’s got JT8s then they definitely didn’t tick the stealth option...
|
Catfish.....looks more like an aircraft with an Irish Canard installed.
|
What about the Alien express ? the shuttle from Las Vegas to Groom lake .
Pretty sure a lot of the alien looking attendees at the Star Trek convention in Las Vegas flew in from Area 51 onboard the white 737 with the red stripe . Although one of my friends who used to commute on it just laughed when I asked if I could get a tour of the UFOs . He said even his accreditation and clearance did not let him tour the space ships . |
Originally Posted by ORAC
(Post 11058893)
Lots of strange aircraft around…. Catfish…
Never heard it called the Catfish before though... Maybe they want old fashioned avionics that aren’t as susceptible to high levels of RF energy. Back maybe 15 years ago, Boeing had a contract to build a prototype E-10 aircraft based on a 767-400ER airframe. It was going to have a huge, powerful ground search radar hung under the forward fuselage (the longer 767-400 airframe being dictated by the size of the radar). That radar was direct line of sight with the engine FADECs, and interference with engine operation was a big concern. I got a call that went something like this: "What level of HIRF can the CF6-80C2 FADEC handle?" "We tested to 200 volts/meter, wide band, from x to y megahertz, it passed" "Yea, but what can it handle?" "Don't know, we didn't test to failure, we only tested to 200 volts/meter - that's what the FAA mandated - and it passed. What's the threat?" "Can't tell you that - it's classified. How much can it handle?" "Well, we'd have to test it again, but to be useful we'd need to know the threat so we know what to test for. The test isn't cheap, plus depending on the threat we may not be able to duplicate it in the lab." "Oh, I'll get back to you." About 3 months later that call would be repeated... Went on for over a year. Finally the program got cancelled. That 767-400ER was the last one ever built - eventually it was equipped as a standard passenger 767 and delivered to a commercial customer... |
Area 51 does not exist.....
|
Tdracer,
Now operating out of Palmdale Plant 42. Returning to the most secret 737 theme and RAT55 https://jalopnik.com/the-worlds-most...ost-1686479619 Then of course there’s….. https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...y-modified-737 But we’ve been here before…. https://www.pprune.org/military-avia...00-n712jm.html |
Tdracer,
Reference Catfish. there is also Catbird, CATB (Cooperative Avionics Test Bed). Catbird being Lockheed’s ICAO callsign. I presume Catfish was correspondingly used informally, as it’s the ICAO callsign of a UK company. And of course because, because it’s the F-22 radar, ESM and other sensor testbed : “Scientists believe that catfish have whiskers, which are also called “barbels”, due to the fact that each one is loaded with tiny taste buds and special olfactory sensors to help them smell and feel the food around them when navigating in the dark.”…… https://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1267870/pg1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_CATBird https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....87d7d7b4d.jpeg |
Hmm, CAT B...
"Body shell should be crushed. Signifies extensive damage, although some parts are salvageable. Should never re-appear on road, although reclaimed parts can be used in other road-going vehicles." |
Ipanema,
Wrong thread for that question - try the Tech Log forum. |
About 2500m
|
Yes, I would have thought Janet would have been more secret.
Saw her take off from Vegas once - pretty sporty climb out and angle of bank too. |
The Janet aircraft are not secret. They are stock second hand 737-600.
|
Originally Posted by Less Hair
(Post 11059731)
The Janet aircraft are not secret. They are stock second hand 737-600.
|
Heli Expo 2018 Vegas
Originally Posted by Video Mixdown
(Post 11059750)
That's what I was thinking. The work their passengers do is no doubt classified, but the aircraft are just transport.
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....592493344.jpeg https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....7f12ae62b.jpeg https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....5fcb51c96.jpeg https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....e5698e9fb.jpeg https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....3a4faefef.jpeg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....135bbdd75.jpeg |
Originally Posted by ipanema
(Post 11059601)
I'm looking for someone with access to a 737MAX8 manual with the Performance graphs.- or Boeing's performance spec charts.
My specific interest is in the runway length required for takeoff at MTOW at sea level at ISA+15 with a 5-knot crosswind component (from the right, in case you needed that!). Asking for a friend! Thanks much in advance.. Ipanema. |
Originally Posted by tartare
(Post 11059727)
Yes, I would have thought Janet would have been more secret.
Saw her take off from Vegas once - pretty sporty climb out and angle of bank too. https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....ac41309f5.jpeg |
Cant imagine the Janet transits are that long either, likely less than 20 minutes tarmac to tarmac, so they likely have a small fuel fraction as well.
My shortest jet leg was Kauai to Hono, with the MD-87 captain announcing a 16 minute travel time. First hostess came by literally tossing out small pull top POG juices, followed by second hostess about 90 seconds later with the trash bag. |
KLAS to KXTA is 76 NM.
|
Originally Posted by Dunhovrin
(Post 11059993)
Yeah, this was only at A8, so I guess it wasn't very full.
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....ac41309f5.jpeg Oh to know what those passengers do once they walk through the special turnstiles at the other end of the route! Yes video mixdown - I get they're stock standard... |
Originally Posted by tdracer
(Post 11059110)
That's a distinct possibility, given it's task. I know that was a big deal on the 747-200 based Air Force One aircraft - those old fashioned analog electronics made it a lot easier to get the EMI protection levels the USAF wanted.
The EMC spec was quite challenging... the levels at which it was required to survive were completely un-survivable by the human pilot it was supporting... |
THE most secretive 737 is not mentioned on here.
|
Originally Posted by vegassun
(Post 11061381)
THE most secretive 737 is not mentioned on here.
Go on please share and is it operated by the Company or one of its modern day equivalent of Air America. cheers |
Originally Posted by chopper2004
(Post 11061469)
???
Go on please share and is it operated by the Company or one of its modern day equivalent of Air America. cheers - No USAF Markings but apparently belongs to the USAF - Flown by USAF crews in civilian attire - N number is disguised and blocked - Flown out of a civilian airport in California https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...y-modified-737 |
Spooky2,
You mean the one already talked about in post #20? https://www.pprune.org/military-avia...l#post11059131 |
Sorry I missed that post. Same one.
|
Out to tender
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:43. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.